Advertisement

Doing the Managerial Flexibility Maths

  • Ricardo G. Barcelona
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter maps the linkages between NPVs and binomial tree calculations, where volatilities are explicitly evaluated. A step-by-step illustration is presented, showing how binomial tree analysis is performed using economic costs of supplies. This involves estimating the node values for fuel and the associated transport and conversion costs to estimate fuel costs. The capital recovery factor and variable costs, which are fairly stable, are added to fuel costs to derive power prices. The cash margins are simply the difference between the power prices and the economic cash costs of supplies, which is equivalent to the fuel and variable costs. The risked payoffs are derived from the binomial tree, referred to as the strategic economic payoffs, weighted by their risk-adjusted probabilities for up or down moves. When the commitment costs are deducted from this sum, we now have the strategic option value (or expanded NPV). The value of managerial flexibility is simply the difference between a rigid and a flexible supply in terms of pricing or volume.

References

  1. Black, F. S., & Scholes, M. S. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Botterud, A., & Korpås, M. (2007). A stochastic dynamic model for optimal timing of investments in new generation capacity in restructured power systems. Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 29, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chevalier-Roignant, B., & Trigeorgis, L. (2011). Competitive strategy: Options and games. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Creti, A., & Villeneuve, B. (2004). Long term contracts and take-or-pay clauses in natural gas markets. Energy Studies Review, 13(1), 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. De Reyck, B., Degraeve, Z., & Vanderborre, R. (2008). Project options valuation with NPV and decision tree analysis. European Journal of Operations Research, 184, 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eppen, G. D., Martin, R. K., & Schrage, L. E. (1989). A scenario approach to capacity planning. Operations Research, 37(4), 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2004). The capital asset pricing model: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernandez, P. (2008). 201 errores en la valoracion de empresas (201 errors in company valuation). Barcelona: Deusto.Google Scholar
  10. Frommer, D. (2014, October 14). Sorry, Mr Prime Minister, Apple didn’t kill Nokia—Nokia did, Quartz.com. Retrieved July 14, 2016 from http://qz.com/280987/sorry-mr-prime-minister-apple-didnt-kill-nokia-nokia-did/.
  11. Klein, B., Crawford, R. G., & Alchian, A. A. (1978). Vertical integration, appropriable rents and the competitive contracting process. Journal of Law and Economics, 74, 87–98.Google Scholar
  12. Luehrman, T. A. (1998, September–October). Strategy as a portfolio of real options. Harvard Business Review, 89–99.Google Scholar
  13. Masten, S. E., & Crocker, K. J. (1985). Efficient adaptation in long-term contracts: Take-or-pay provisions for natural gas. The American Economic Review, 75(5), 1083–1093.Google Scholar
  14. Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(1), 141–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mintz, S.L. (1999). CFO Magazine, November 1999.Google Scholar
  16. Trigeorgis, L. (1997). Real options. London: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, second printing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IESE Business SchoolUniversity of NavarraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations