Advertisement

Future Research in Humanitarian Operations: A Behavioral Operations Perspective

  • Karthik Sankaranarayanan
  • Jaime Andrés Castañeda
  • Sebastián Villa
Chapter

Abstract

Behavioral operations have established itself as a mature field of research in operations and supply chain management. Since almost all operational contexts contain people (e.g., managers, employees and customers) who are prone to decision-making errors that can negatively impact performance, behavioral operations can inform models and frameworks in operations management to account for such shortcomings. In this chapter, we explore the application of different methodological tools used in behavioral operations to study behavior in humanitarian logistics and supply chain management (HLSCM). Specifically, the chapter will explore the use of behavioral experiments, system dynamics and agent-based modeling as methodologies to understand decision making in humanitarian operations.

References

  1. Abosuliman, Shougi Suliman Hassn. 2014. “A System Dynamics & Emergency Logistics Model for Post-Disaster Relief Operations.” Melbourne, Victoria: RMIT University.Google Scholar
  2. Albino, Vito, Nunzia Carbonara, and Ilaria Giannoccaro. 2006. “Innovation in industrial districts: An agent-based simulation model.” International Journal of Production Economics 104 (1): 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albino, Vito, Nunzia Carbonara, and Ilaria Giannoccaro. 2007. “Supply Chain Cooperation in Industrial Districts: A Simulation Analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research 177 (1): 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altay, N., and R. Pal. 2014. “Information Diffusion Among Agents: Implications for Humanitarian Operations.” Production and Operations Management 23 (6): 1015–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amini, Mehdi, Tina Wakolbinger, Michael Racer, and Mohammad G. Nejad. 2012. “Alternative Supply Chain Production–Sales Policies for New Product Diffusion: An Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation Approach.” European Journal of Operational Research 216 (2): 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arango, S., J. A. Castañeda, and Y. Olaya. 2012. “Laboratory Experiments in the System Dynamics Field.” System Dynamics Review 28 (1): 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arango, S., J. A. Castañeda, and E. R. Larsen. 2013. “Mothballing in Power Markets: An Experimental Study.” Energy Economics 36 (Elsevier B.V.): 125–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Argyris, C. 1985. Strategy, Change and Defensive Routines. New York, NY: Harper Business.Google Scholar
  9. Arkes, H. 1991. “Cost and Benefits of Judgment Errors: Implications for Debiasing.” Psychological Bulletin 110 (3): 486–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Axelrod, Robert M. 1997. The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Balcik, B., and B. M. Beamon. 2008. “Facility Location in Humanitarian Relief.” International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 11 (2): 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Balcik, Burcu, Benita M. Beamon., Caroline C. Krejci., Kyle M. Muramatsu., and Magaly Ramirez. 2010. “Coordination in Humanitarian Relief Chains: Practices, Challenges and Opportunities.” International Journal of Production Economics 126 (1): 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Banerjee, A. V., and E. Duflo. 2011. Poor Economics: Barefoot Hedge-Fund Managers, DIY Doctors and the Surprising Truth About Life on Less than $1 a Day. New York, NY: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  14. Banks, J., J. S. Carson, B. L. Nelson, and D. M. Nicol. 2004. Discrete-Event System Simulation. 4 ed. Upper Saddle: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Barbati, M., G. Bruno, and A. Genovese. 2012. “Applications of Agent-Based Models for Optimization Problems: A Literature Review.” Expert Systems with Applications 39 (5): 6020–6028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Barlas, Yaman. 1996. “Formal Aspects of Model Validity and Validation in System Dynamics.” System Dynamics Review 12 (3): 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Barlas, Yaman. 2007. “Leverage Points to March ‘upward from the Aimless Plateau.’” System Dynamics Review 23 (4): 469–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Beamon, Benita. M., and Burcu Balcik. 2008. “Performance Measurement in Humanitarian Relief Chains.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 21 (1): 4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Becker-Peth, M., E. Katok, and U. W. Thonemann. 2013. “Designing Buyback Contracts for Irrational But Predictable Newsvendors.” Management Science 59 (8): 1800–1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bendoly, E., R. Croson, P. Gonçalves, and K. Schultz. 2010. “Bodies of Knowledge for Research in Behavioral Operations.” Production and Operations Management 19 (4): 434–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bendoly, Elliot, Wout van Wezel, and Daniel G. Bachrach. 2015. The Handbook of Behavioral Operations Management: Social and Psychological Dynamics in Production and Service Settings. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  22. Besiou, M., and L. N. Van Wassenhove. 2015. “Addressing the Challenge of Modeling for Decision-Making in Socially Responsible Operations.” Production and Operations Management 24 (9): 1390–1401.Google Scholar
  23. Besiou, M., O. Stapleton, and L. N. van Wassenhove. 2010. “Exploring the Known and the Unknown: Future Possibilities of System Dynamics for Humanitarian Operations.” INSEAD Working Paper 2010/74/TOM/ISIC.Google Scholar
  24. Besiou, M., A. Pedraza-Martinez, and L. N. van Wassenhove. 2014. “Vehicle Supply Chains in Humanitarian Operations: Decentralization, Operational Mix, and Earmarked Funding.” Production and Operations Management 23 (11): 1950–1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bilbao-Osorio, Beñat, Soumitra Dutta, and Bruno Lanvin. 2013. The global information technology report 2013.Google Scholar
  26. Bolton, G. E., A. Ockenfels, and U. W. Thonemann. 2012. “Managers and Students as Newsvendors.” Management Science 58(12): 2225–2233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bonabeau, E. 2002. “Agent-Based Modeling: Methods and Techniques for Simulating Human Systems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99: 7280–7287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Brase, G. L. 2009. “How Different Types of Participant Payments Alter Task Performance.” Judgment and Decision Making 4(5): 419–428.Google Scholar
  29. Bruzzone, A. G. 2005. “Agent Directed HLA Simulation for Complex Supply Chain Modeling.” Simulation 81 (9): 647–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Bui, Tung, Sungwon Cho, Siva Sankaran, and Michael Sovereign. 2000. “A Framework for Designing a Global Information Network for Multinational Humanitarian Assistance/Disaster Relief.” Information Systems Frontiers 1 (4): 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Camerer, C. F., and R. M. Hogarth. 1999. “The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor Production Framework.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19(1–3): 7–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Campbell, A. M., and P. C. Jones. 2011. “Prepositioning Supplies in Preparation for Disasters.” European Journal of Operational Research 209(2): 156–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Castañeda, J. A., M. E. Brennan, and J. Goentzel. 2016. Supply Chain Contract Design for a Newsvendor Problem in a Developing Economy. Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  34. Casti, John L. 1997. Would-Be Worlds: How Simulation Is Changing the Frontiers of Science. New York; Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Chaturvedi, Alok, Brian Armstrong, and Rashmi Chaturvedi. 2014. “Securing the Food Supply Chain: Understanding Complex Interdependence Through Agent-Based Simulation.” Health and Technology 4 (2): 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Choi, T. Y., K. J. Dooley, and M. Rungtusanatham. 2001. “Supply Networks and Complex Adaptive Systems: Control Versus Emergence.” Journal of Operations Management 19 (3): 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Chomilier, Bernard, Ramina Samii, and L. N. van Wassenhove. 2000. “The Central Role of Supply Chain Management at IFRC.” Forced Mitigation Review 18 (1): 15–16.Google Scholar
  38. Croson, R., and K. L. Donohue. 2006. “Behavioral Causes of the Bullwhip Effect and the Observed Value of Inventory Information.” Management Science 52(3): 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Croson, R. T. A., F. Handy, and J. Shang. 2010. “Gendered Giving: The Influence of Social Norms on the Donation Behavior of Men and Women.” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 15(2): 199–213.Google Scholar
  40. Cruz-Cantillo, Yesenia. 2014. “A System Dynamics Approach to Humanitarian Logistics and the Transportation of Relief Supplies.” International Journal of System Dynamics Applications 3 (3): 96–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Day, J. M., S. A. Melnyk, P. D. Larson, E. W. Davis, and D. C. Whybark. 2012. “Humanitarian and Disaster Relief Supply Chains: A Matter of Life and Death.” Journal of Supply Chain Management 48(2): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Diehl, E., and J. D. Sterman. 1995. “Effects of Feedback Complexity on Dynamic Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 62 (2): 198–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dispartite, D. 2007. “The Postmans Parallel.” Car Nation 1: 22–27.Google Scholar
  44. Dolinskaya, Irina S., Zhenyu Edwin Shi, Karen R. Smilowitz, and Michael Ross. 2011. “Decentralized Approaches to Logistics Coordination in Humanitarian Relief.” In The 2011 Industrial Engineering Research Conference. Reno, Nev.Google Scholar
  45. Donohue, K. L., and R. Croson. 2002. “Experimental Economics and Supply-Chain Management.” Interfaces 32 (5): 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Einhorn, H. J., and R. M. Hogarth. 1981. “Behavioral Decision Theory: Processes of Judgement and Choice.” Annual Review of Psychology 32 (1): 53–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Elsbach, K. D. 2003. “Organizational Perception Management.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by R. M. Kramer, B. M. Staw, 297–332. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  48. Epstein, Joshua M., Robert L. Axtell, and Brookings Institution. 1996. Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up; A Product of the 2050 Project, a Collaborative Effort of the Brookings Institution, the Santa Fe Institute, and the World Resources Institute. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute PressGoogle Scholar
  49. Evangelidis, I., and B. Van den Bergh. 2013. “The Number of Fatalities Drives Disaster Aid: Increasing Sensitivity to People in Need.” Psychological Science 24(11): 2226–2234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Fiedrich, Frank, and Paul Burghardt. 2007. “Agent-Based Systems for Disaster Management.” Communications of the ACM 50 (3): 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ford, J. K., and A. M. Schmidt. 2000. “Emergency Response Training: Strategies for Enhancing Real-World Performance.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 75(2–3): 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Forget, Pascal, Sophie D’Amours, Jean-Marc Frayret, and Jonathan Gaudreault. 2009. “Study of the Performance of Multi-behaviour Agents for Supply Chain Planning.” Computers in Industry 60 (9): 698–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Forrester, J. W. 1958. “Industrial Dynamics – A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers.” Harvard Business Review 36 (4): 37–66.Google Scholar
  54. Forrester, J. W. 1961. Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Forrester, J. W. 2007. “System Dynamics – The Next Fifty Years.” System Dynamics Review 23 (2/3): 359–370. doi: 10.1002/sdr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Forrester, J. W., and Peter Senge. 1980. “Test for Building Confidence in System Dynamic Models.” TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences 14 (1): 209–228.Google Scholar
  57. García-Flores, Rodolfo, and Xue Zhong Wang. 2002. “A Multi-agent System for Chemical Supply Chain Simulation and Management Support.” OR Spectrum 24 (3): 343–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gardner, Martin. 1970. “Mathematical Games: The Fantastic Combinations of John Conway’s New Solitaire Game ‘Life’.” Scientific American 223 (4): 120–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. George, A. 2003. “Using Accountability to Improve Reproductive Health Care.” Reproductive Health Matters 11 (21): 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Gilbert, G. Nigel, and Klaus G. Troitzsch. 2005. Simulation for the Social Scientist. Vol. 2nd. New York; Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Gonçalves, P. 2008. “System Dynamics Modeling of Humanitarian Relief Operations.” MIT Sloan School Working Paper 4704-08.Google Scholar
  62. Gonçalves, P. 2011. “Balancing Provision of Relief and Recovery with Capacity Building in Humanitarian Operations.” Operations Management Research 4 (1–2): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Gonçalves, P., and J. A. Castañeda. 2016. Stockpiling Supplies for Disaster Response: An Experimental Analysis of Prepositioning Biases. Working paper, Università della Svizzera italiana (USI, Lugano), Lugano, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  64. Gonçalves, P., and S. Villa. 2016. “Implications of Misperception of Feedback on Behavior in Operations.” In Behavioural Operational Research: Theory, Methodology and Practice, edited by M. Kunc, J. Malpass, and L. White. London, UK: Palgrave Publishers.Google Scholar
  65. Gralla, E. L., J. Goentzel, and B. Chomilier. 2015. “Case Study of a Humanitarian Logistics Simulation Exercise and Insights for Training Design.” Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 5(1): 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Gralla, E. L., J. Goentzel, and C. Fine 2016. “Problem Formulation and Solution Mechanisms: A Behavioral Study of Humanitarian Transportation Planning.” Production and Operations Management 25(1): 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Guala, F. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Gutowitz, Howard. 1991. Cellular Automata: Theory and Experiment. 1. MIT Press ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  69. Heims, Steve, John von Neumann, and Norbert Wiener. 1984. John von Neumann and Norbert Wiener: From Mathematics to the Technologies of Life and Death. 2. printing. ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  70. Hertwig, R., and A. Ortmann. 2001. “Experimental Practices in Economics: A Methodological Challenge for Psychologists?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(3): 383–403.Google Scholar
  71. Hey, J. D. 1996. Experimentos en Economía. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  72. Heyman, J., and D. Ariely. 2004. “Effort for Payment: A Tale of Two Markets.” Psychological Science, 15(11): 787–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Holguín-Veras, J., M. Jaller, L. N. van Wassenhove, N. Pérez, and T. Wachtendorf. 2012. “On the Unique Features of Post-Disaster Humanitarian Logistics.” Journal of Operations Management 30(7–8): 494–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Holguín-Veras, J., M. Jaller, L. Van Wassenhove, N. Pérez, and T. Wachtendorf. 2014. “Material Convergence: Important and Understudied Disaster Phenomenon.” Natural Hazards Review 15(1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Holland, J. H. 1992. “Genetic Algorithms.” Scientific American 267 (1): 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Holland, J. H., and J. H. Miller. 1991. “Artificial Adaptive Agents in Economic-Theory.” American Economic Review 81 (2): 365–370.Google Scholar
  77. Holland, John H. 2001. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. 6. printing. ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  78. Huber, M., L. Van Boven, A. P. McGraw, and L. Johnson-Graham. 2011. “Whom to Help? Immediacy Bias in Judgments and Decisions About Humanitarian Aid.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 115(2): 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Julka, Nirupam, Rajagopalan Srinivasan, and I. Karimi. 2002a. “Agent-Based Supply Chain Management—1: Framework.” Computers & Chemical Engineering 26 (12): 1755–1769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Julka, Nirupam, I. Karimi, and Rajagopalan Srinivasan. 2002b. “Agent-Based Supply Chain Management—2: A Refinery Application.” Computers & Chemical Engineering 26 (12): 1771–1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Kaatrud, David B., Ramina Samii, and L. N. van Wassenhove. 2003. “UN Joint Logistics Centre: A Coordinated Response to Common Humanitarian Logistics Concerns.” Forced Migration Review 18 (1): 11–18.Google Scholar
  82. Katok, E. 2010. “Using Laboratory Experiments to Build Better Operations Management Models.” Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management 5(1): 1–84.Google Scholar
  83. Katok, E., and D. Y. Wu. 2009. “Contracting in Supply Chains: A Laboratory Investigation.” Management Science 55(12): 1953–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Kent, R. C. 1987. Anatomy of disaster relief: The international network in action. London, UK: Pinter.Google Scholar
  85. Kleinmuntz, D., and J. Thomas. 1987. “The value of action and inference in dynamic decision making”. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39 (3): 341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Kogut, T., and I. Ritov. 2005. “The ‘Identified Victim’ Effect: An Identified Group, or Just a Single Individual?” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 18(3): 157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Kogut, T., and I. Ritov. 2007. “‘One of Us’: Outstanding Willingness to Help Save a Single Identified Compatriot.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 104(2): 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Kremer, M., S. Minner, and L. N. van Wassenhove. 2010. “Do Random Errors Explain Newsvendor Behavior?” Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 12(4): 673–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Laite, Ralph, Nataliya Portman, and Karthik Sankaranarayanan. 2016. “Behavioral Analysis of Agent Based Service Channel Design Using Neural Networks.” Forthcoming in the Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference.Google Scholar
  90. Lane, David C., Eileen Munro, and Elke Husemann. 2016. “Blending Systems Thinking Approaches for Organisational Analysis: Reviewing Child Protection in England.” European Journal of Operational Research 251 (2): 613–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Leiras, A., I. de Brito Jr., E. Queiroz, T. Rejane, and H. T. Yoshida. 2014. “Literature Review of Humanitarian Logistics Research: Trends and Challenges.” Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 4 (1): 95–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Macal, C. M., and M. J. North. 2006. “Tutorial on Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation Part 2: How to Model with Agents.” Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, Vols 1–5: 73–83.Google Scholar
  93. Macal, C. M., and M. J. North. 2007. “Agent-Based Modeling and Simulation: Desktop ABMS.” Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, Vols 1–5: 83–94.Google Scholar
  94. Mellouli, S., B. Moulin, and G. Mineau. 2003. “Laying Down the Foundations of an Agent Modelling Methodology for Fault-Tolerant Multi-agent Systems.” Engineering Societies in the Agents World Iv 3071: 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Menth, Megan, and Jessica L. Heier Stamm. 2015. “An Agent-Based Modeling Approach to Improve Coordination Between Humanitarian Relief Providers.” 2015 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).Google Scholar
  96. Mete, H. O., and Z. B. Zabinsky. 2010. “Stochastic Optimization of Medical Supply Location and Distribution in Disaster Management.” International Journal of Production Economics 126 (1): 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Miller, John H., and Scott E. Page. 2007. Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Moritz, B. B. 2010. Cognition and Heterogeneity in Supply Chain Planning: A Study of Inventory Decision Making. Ph.D. Dissertation, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  99. Moritz, B. B., A. V. Hill, and K. L. Donohue 2013. “Individual Differences in the Newsvendor Problem: Behavior and Cognitive Reflection.” Journal of Operations Management 31(1–2): 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Morton, R. B., and K. C. Williams 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Muggy, Luke, L. Heier Stamm, Jessica. 2014. “Game theory applications in humanitarian operations: a review.” Journal of Humanitarian Logistics and Supply Chain Management 4 (1): 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Muhren, W. J., and B. A. Van de Walle 2009. Sensemaking and Information Management in Humanitarian Disaster Response: Observations from the TRIPLEX Exercise. Paper presented at 6th International ISCRAM Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
  103. Ni, C., R. De Souza, Q. Lu, and M. Goh. 2015. “Emergency Preparedness of Humanitarian Organizations: A System Dynamics Approach.” In Humanitarian Logistics and Sustainability, edited by M. Klumpp, S. de Leeuw, A. Regattieri, and R. De Souza, First.Google Scholar
  104. Oliveira, J. B., R. S. Lima, and J. A. B. Montevechi. 2016. “Perspectives and Relationships in Supply Chain Simulation: A Systematic Literature Review.” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 62: 166–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Ortuño, M. T., P. Cristóbal, J. M. Ferrer, F. J. Martín-Campo, S. Muñoz, G. Tirado, and B. Vitoriano. 2013. “Decision Aid Models and Systems for Humanitarian Logistics.” A Survey 7: 17–44.Google Scholar
  106. Osterloh, M., and B. S. Frey. 2002. “Does Pay for Performance Really Motivate Employees?” In Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice, edited by A. Neely, 107–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Pedraza-Martinez, A., S. Hasija, and L. N. van Wassenhove. 2010. “An Operational Mechanism Design for Fleet Management Coordination in Humanitarian Operations.” INSEAD Working Paper 2010/87/TOM/ISIC.Google Scholar
  108. Pedraza-Martinez, A., O. Stapleton, and L. N. van Wassenhove. 2011. “Field Vehicle Fleet Management in Humanitarian Operations: A Case-Based Approach.” Journal of Operations Management 29 (1): 401–421.Google Scholar
  109. Peng, Min, Yi Peng, and Hong Chen. 2014. “Post-Seismic Supply Chain Risk Management: A System Dynamics Disruption Analysis Approach for Inventory and Logistics Planning.” Computers and Operations Research 42 (Elsevier): 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Perry, J. L., D. Mesch, and L. Paalberg. 2006. “Motivating Employees in a New Governance Era: The Performance Paradigm Revisited.” Public Administration Review 66(4): 505–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Porter, Michael E. 1998. “Cluster and the New Economics of Competition.”​Harvard Business Review 76 (6): 77–90.Google Scholar
  112. Rawls, C. G., and M. A. Turnquist. 2010. “Pre-Positioning of Emergency Supplies for Disaster Response.” Transportation Research Part B 44(4): 521–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Rawls, C. G., and M. A. Turnquist. 2012. “Pre-Positioning and Dynamic Delivery Planning for Short-Term Response Following a Natural Disaster.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 46(1): 46–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Richardson, G. P., and A. Pugh. 1983. Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling with DYNAMO. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  115. Rubel, Das. 2014. “Advancement on Uncertainty Modeling in Humanitarian Logistics for Earthquake Response.” Doctoral Dissertation of Transport Studies Unit, Tokyo Institute of Technology, TSU-DC2014-007. Google Scholar
  116. Samii, Ramina. 2008. “Leveraging Logistics Partnerships: Lessons from Humanitarian Organizations.” Erasmus University of Rotterdam. http://repub.eur.nl/pub/14519/.
  117. Samuelson, D. A., and C. M. Macal. 2006. “Agent-Based Simulation Comes of Age.” ORMS Today 33 (4): 34–38.Google Scholar
  118. Sankaranarayanan, Karthik. 2011. “Study on Behavioral Patterns in Queuing.” Università della Svizzera italiana.Google Scholar
  119. Sankaranarayanan, K., Delgado, C., van Ackere, A. et al. 2014. “The micro-dynamics of queuing: understanding the formation of queues.” Journal of Simulation 8 (4): 304–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Schelling, Thomas C. 1971. “Dynamic Models of Segregation.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1 (2): 143–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Shang, J., A. Reed II, R. T. A. Croson. 2008. “Identity Congruency Effects on Donations.” Journal of Marketing Research 45(3): 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Siebers, Peer-Olaf, Charles M. Macal, Jeremy Garnett, D. Buxton, and Michael Pidd. 2010. “Discrete-Event Simulation Is Dead, Long Live Agent-Based Simulation!” Journal of Simulation 4 (3): 204–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Siemsen, E. 2011. “The Usefulness of Behavioral Laboratory Experiments in Supply Chain Management Research.” Journal of Supply Chain Management 47(3): 17–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Simon, Herbert Alexander. 1955. “A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 (1): 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G. 2003. “Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 26(1): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Small, D. A., G. Loewenstein, and P. Slovic. 2007. “Sympathy and Callousness: The Impact of Deliberative Thought on Donations to Identifiable and Statistical Victims.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102(2): 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Smith, V. L. 1976. “Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory.” American Economic Review 66(2): 274–279.Google Scholar
  128. Smith, V. L. 1982. “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science.” American Economic Review 72(5): 923–955.Google Scholar
  129. Smith, V. L. 1994. “Economics in the Laboratory.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1): 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Smith, V. L., and J. M. Walker. 1993. “Monetary Rewards and Decision Cost in Experimental Economics.” Economic Inquiry 31 (2): 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Smith, P. K., and A. D. Galinsky. 2010. “The Nonconscious Nature of Power: Cues and Consequences.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4 (10): 918–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Stephenson, M. 2005. “Making humanitarian relief networks more effective: operational coordination, trust and sensemaking.” Disasters 29 (4): 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Sterman, J. D. 1989a. “Misperceptions of Feedback in Dynamic Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43 (3): 301–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Sterman, J. D. 1989b. “Modeling Managerial Behavior: Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment.” Management Science 35 (3): 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Sterman, J. D. 2000. Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Chicago, Illinois: Irwin-McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  136. Sterman, J. D. 2001. “System Dynamics Modeling: Tools for Learning in a Complex World.” California Management Review 43 (4): 8–25.Google Scholar
  137. Sterman, John. 2015. “Booms, Busts, and Beer: Understanding the Dynamics of Supply Chains.” In The Handbook of Behavioral Operations Management: Social and Psychological Dynamics in Production and Service Settings, edited by Elliot Bendoly, Wout van Wezel and Daniel G. Bachrach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  138. Tierney, K., C. Bevc, and E. Kuligowski. 2006. “Metaphors Matter: Disaster Myths, Media Frames, and Their Consequences in Hurricane Katrina.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604(1): 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Tomasini, R. 2012. “Humanitarian Partnerships ‒ Drivers, Facilitators, and Components: The Case of Non-food Item Distribution in Sudan.” In Relief Supply Chain Management for Disasters: Humanitarian Aid and Emergency Logistics, edited by G. Kovács and K. Spens, 1st ed., 16–30. Hershey PA 17033, USA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Tversky, A., and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 185 (4157): 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Urrea, G., S. Villa, and P. Gonçalves. 2016. “Exploratory Analyses of Relief and Development Ops Using Social Networks.” Socio-Economic Planning Science 56 (1): 27–39.Google Scholar
  142. van den Belt, M. 2004. Mediated Modeling: A System Dynamics Approach to Environmental Consensus Building. Washington DC: Island Pre.Google Scholar
  143. van Wassenhove, L. N. 2006. “Humanitarian Aid Logistics: Supply Chain Management in High Gear.” Journal of the Operational Research Society 57 (1): 475–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. van Wassenhove, L. N., and M. Besiou. 2013. “Complex Problems with Multiple Stakeholders: How to Bridge the Gap Between Reality and OR/MS?” Business Economics 83 (1): 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Vennix, J. A. 1996. Group Model-Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  146. Villa, S., P. Gonçalves, and S. Arango. 2015. “Exploring Retailers’ Ordering Decisions Under Delays.” System Dynamics Review 31 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Voyer, J., M. Dean, and C. Pickles. 2015. “Understanding Humanitarian Supply Chain Logistics with System Dynamics Modeling.” Portland, ME.Google Scholar
  148. Wakolbinger, T., and F. Toyasaki. 2011. “Impacts of Funding Systems on Humanitarian Operations.” In Humanitarian Logistics. Meeting the Challenge of Preparing For and Responding to Disasters, edited by M. G. Christopher and P. H. Tatham, 41–56. London: Kogan Page Limited.Google Scholar
  149. Wang, Xuping, Qi Wang, and Mingtian Chen. 2012. “System Dynamics Model of Unconventional Emergency Resource Coordination System.” In Proceedings of the 2012 5th International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization, CSO 2012, 271–275.Google Scholar
  150. Wolfram, Stephen. 2002. Cellular Automata and Complexity: Collected Papers. [Nachdr.] ed. Boulder, Co: Westview-Press.Google Scholar
  151. Wu, D. Y., and K.-Y. Chen. 2014. “Supply Chain Contract Design: Impact of Bounded Rationality and Individual Heterogeneity.” Production and Operations Management 23(2): 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Zheng, Hong, Young-Jun Son, Yi-Chang Chiu, Larry Head, Yiheng Feng, Hui Xi, Sojung Kim, and Mark Hickman. 2013. “A Primer for Agent-Based Simulation and Modeling in Transportation Applications.” Technical Report of the U.S. Department of Transportation, (No. FHWA-HRT-13-054).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karthik Sankaranarayanan
    • 1
  • Jaime Andrés Castañeda
    • 2
  • Sebastián Villa
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Ontario Institute of TechnologyOshawaCanada
  2. 2.Universidad del RosarioBogotáColombia
  3. 3.University of Los AndesBogotáColombia

Personalised recommendations