Mauritius: Still a Long Journey Ahead

Part of the Gender and Politics book series (GAP)


This chapter examines women’s participation and presence in politics in Mauritius. While Mauritius has excelled in most democratic indicators in terms of maintaining stable governance, rule of law and successful holding of democratic elections at regular intervals, yet it has been slow in improving gender equality in politics. Women have slowly integrated into the political system, but their presence in parliament and in executive positions of political parties remains low. Drawing from data gathered from semi-structured interviews conducted with women politicians and independent women activists, this chapter examines why women’s representation in Mauritian politics has been minimal since independence. Ramtohul attributes the systematic marginalization of women in politics to the focus on ethnic and religious political representation as well as the entrenched patriarchal and conservative culture.


Mauritian Politics Mauritian Women Electoral Ticket Smear Campaign Mauritian Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Breytenbach, W. 2002. Democracy in the SADC region: A Comparative Overview. African Security Review 11 (4): 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bunwaree, S., and Kasenally, R. 2005. Political Parties and Democracy in Mauritius. EISA Research Report No. 19. Johannesburg: EISA.Google Scholar
  3. Bunwaree, S. 2010. Governance, Gender and Politics in Mauritius. Mauritius: Editions Le Printemps.Google Scholar
  4. Chiroro, B. 2005. The Forthcoming Election in Mauritius, 2005. Election Talk. No. 23, 24 June 2005 EISA Monthly Newsletter. Accessed 31 Aug 2005.
  5. Dukhira, C. 2002. History of Mauritius: Experiments in Democracy. Quatre-Bornes, Mauritius: Chit Dukhira.Google Scholar
  6. Eriksen, T.H. 1998. Common Denominators: Ethnicity, Nation-Building and Compromise in Mauritius. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  7. Gunganah, B., S. Ragobur, and O.N. Varma. 1997. Beyond Inequalities: Women in Mauritius. Mauritius & Harare: MAW, SARDC.Google Scholar
  8. Karam, A. (ed.). 1998. Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers. Stockholm: IDEA.Google Scholar
  9. Lowe Morna, C., and S. Tolmay (eds.). 2007. At the Coalface: Gender and Local Government in Southern Africa. South Africa: Gender Links.Google Scholar
  10. Ly Tio Fane-Pineo, H., and Lim Fat, E. 2008. From Alien to Citizen: The Integration of the Chinese in Mauritius. Mauritius: Editions de L’Océan Indien.Google Scholar
  11. Patten, P. 2001. Task Force Report. Port Louis: Ministry of Women’s Rights, Child Development and Family Welfare.Google Scholar
  12. Phillips, A. 1991. Engendering Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ramtohul, R. 2009. Women and Politics in a Plural Society: The Case of Mauritius. PhD thesis, University of Cape Town (Unpublished).Google Scholar
  14. Ramtohul, R. 2015. Intersectionality and Women’s Political Citizenship: The Case of Mauritius. Journal of Contemporary African Studies 33 (1): 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ramtohul, R. 2016. Contested Terrain: Identity and Women’s Suffrage in Mauritius. Journal of Southern African Studies 42 (6): 1225–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sachs, A., B.B. Tandon, and R. Ahnee. 2002. Report on the Commission on Constitutional and Electoral Reform. Port Louis: Prime Minister’s Office.Google Scholar
  17. Squires, J., and M. Wickham-Jones. 2001. Women in Parliament: A Comparative Analysis. Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission.Google Scholar
  18. Uteem, C. 2008. Electoral Reform in Mauritius. Available on Accessed 23 Apr 2008.
  19. Virahsawmy, L. 2004. Mauritius: Women Demand an Equal Say. Amalungelo 5: 86. Accessed 29 Aug 2005.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MauritiusMokaMauritius

Personalised recommendations