Skip to main content

Tending the Gate: Admitting Students

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Neuroethics in Higher Education Policy

Abstract

This chapter explores how the admission process serves as a biased competence test of higher education. When designed around incomplete or inaccurate understandings of the human brain, it serves as a barrier to access to higher education either accidentally or purposefully discriminatory. A review of the implications of standard application and admissions processes highlights how admission processes shape not only an individual campus’s environment but access to higher education nationally.

Isabel has been sifting through a stack of papers, forms, and tri-fold pamphlets trying to sort out where to begin. She knows some of her grades were mediocre, but she knows she is smart enough, and college is the only way to change her future. The community college is close to her foster family’s home, it has no dorms, and she can’t stay with them past her 19th birthday unless she has been admitted to the college. Her 19th birthday falls before the date when acceptance letters are issued. Because of policies and bureaucratic red tape within the dependency system, she has few options and there is a high likelihood that she will become homeless.

Another issue plaguing Isabel with the admissions process is that she had a problem with financial aid documents. She had to provide proof that she was a ward of the court and in foster care during the last year. The school’s financial aid administrator was not sure which box to check on Isabel’s form. It has been almost two weeks and she still has not heard back from financial aid. So, even if she can be granted a waiver before her birthday, she doesn’t know how she will pay for college. Isabel sits among the scattered, colorful brochures in her shared room at her foster home and cries.—Jubilee Belle Lawhead

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Adams, Caralee J. 2015. 2015 SAT, ACT scores suggest many students aren’t college-ready. Education Week 35(3): 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adelman, Clifford. 1984. The standardized test scores of college graduates 1964-1982. Washington, District of Columbia: National Institution of Education. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED248827.pdf.

  • Armstrong, Thomas. 2010. Neurodiversity: Discovering the Extraordinary Gifts of Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia, and Other Brain Differences. Cambridge, MA: Accessible.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J. 2014. ‘Sagacious’ no more: SAT undergoes major rewrite. The Globe and Mail, A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin, A. 2000. Use of standardized tests in admissions in postsecondary institutions of higher education. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6(1): 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carl Campbell Brigham: The man who devised the SAT. 1997. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education 17:72–73. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2963234, published by: The JBHE Foundation, Inc.

  • Chade, Hector, Gregory Lewis, and Lones Smith. 2014. Student portfolios and the college admissions problem. The Review of Economic Studies 81(3): 971–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinedinst, Melissa E., and David A. Hawkins. 2011. State of College Admission. Washington, DC: National Association for College Admission Counseling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Dwight, J. Kevin Dorsey, Ronald D. Franks, Paul R. Sackett, Cynthia A. Searcy, and Xiaohui Zhao. 2013. Do racial and ethnic group differences in performance on the MCAT exam reflect test bias? Academic Medicine 88(5): 593–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diepenbrock, Amy, and Wanda Gibson. 2014. Cutting-Edge Technologies and Social Media Use in Higher Education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digest of Education Statistics. Average scores on Graduate Record Examination (GRE) general and subject tests: 1965 through 2009. Table 344, National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed March 14, 2016. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d10/tables/dt10_344.asp.

  • Duncan, Arne, and Russlynn Ali. 2011. Students with disabilities preparing for postsecondary education: know your rights and responsibilities. http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/transition.html.

  • Educational Testing Services. GRE general test volumes by country 2005-2014. ETS.org. Accessed March 14, 2016. https://www.ets.org/s/gre/pdf/gre_volumes_by_country.pdf.

  • Evans, J. LSAT exams proctored e-mail to S. Wright, February 02, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiffrida, Douglas A., Martin F. Lynch, Andrew F. Wall, and Darlene S. Abel. 2013. Do reasons for attending college affect academic outcomes?: A test of a motivational model from a self-determination theory perspective. Journal of College Student Development 54(2): 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickx, S. 2010. The Adolescent and Adult Neuro-diversity Handbook: Asperger’s Syndrome, ADHD, Dyslexia, Dyspraxia, and Related Conditions. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laura, Stephanie Nevill, and James Griffith. 2006. Profile of undergraduates in US postsecondary education institutions, 2003-04: with a special analysis of community college students. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2006-184. National Center for Education Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hout, Michael. 2012. Social and economic returns to college education in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology 38: 379–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoxby, Caroline, and Sarah Turner. 2013. Expanding college opportunities for high achieving, low income students. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper, 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, Paul, and Dorothea Hudley. 1994. AAMC Data Book. Statistical Information Related to Medical Education (Rep. No. 370489). Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julian, E.R., D.J. Ingersoll, P.M. Etienne, and A.E. Hilger. 2004. The impact of testing accommodations on MCAT scores: descriptive results. Academic Medicine 79(4): 360–364. Accessed March 14, 2016, from https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8rtDWs83hnCUktlZjFKY25TcVE.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junor, S., and A. Usher. 2008. Student Mobility and Credit Transfer: A National and Global Survey. Virginia Beach, VA: Educational Policy Institute (NJI).

    Google Scholar 

  • LSAC. Total LSATs administered—counts and percent increases by year and administration. Accessed March 14, 2016. http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/lsats-administered.

  • Marks, P., S. Clark, Jr., M. Begun, P. R. Elliot, R. Jarecky, M. Rosenberg, and H. Simon. 1972. Joint Meeting of Council of Deans: Council of Academic Societies (Rep.). Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, Lyle, and Heather Novak. 2013. The relationship between FAFSA filing and persistence among first-year community college students. Community College Review 41(1): 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier, Kenneth J., and Laurence J. O’Toole. 2013. Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23(2): 429–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellow, G.O., and C.M. Heelan. 2014. Minding the Dream: The Process and Practice of the American Community College. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, F.A. 1940. Report of the Committee on Aptitude Tests for Medical School. Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 15: 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, Christopher M. 2012. Transfer: an indispensable part of the community college mission. Policy Brief.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallais, Amanda. 2013. Small differences that matter: mistakes in applying to college. NBER Working Paper Series No. 19480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postrel, V. 2011. Harvard pledge values ‘kindness’ over learning. Bloomberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radunzel, Justine, and Julie Noble. 2012. Predicting Long-Term College Success Through Degree Completion Using ACT Composite Score, ACT Benchmarks, and High School Grade Point Average. Iowa City, IA: ACT Research Report Series 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, C.A., and R.J. Goscha. 2011. The Strengths Model: A Recovery-Oriented Approach to Mental Health Services. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Todd. 2013. The myth of average. TEDxSonomaCounty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, Richard. 2013. Beyond correlation: usefulness of high school GPA and test scores in making college admission decisions. Applied Measurement in Education 26(2): 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schur, L., D. Kruse, and P. Blanck. 2013. People with Disabilities: Sidelined or Mainstreamed? New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, H. 2013. From where i sit—Aptitude adjustment. The Times Higher Education Supplement 2123: 19–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Johnathan, Matea Pender, and Jessica Howell. 2013. The full extent of student-college undermatch. Economics of Education Review 32(2013): 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. 1983. Information Concerning Mean Test Scores for the Graduate Admission Test (GMAT), Graduate Record Examinations (GRE), Law School Admission Test (LSAT), Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT), and Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) for the National Commission on Excellence in Education. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Students Applicants and Residents. Percentages and scaled score tables. The Association of American Medical Colleges. Accessed March 14, 2016. https://students-residents.aamc.org/advisors/article/percentages-and-scaled-score-tables/.

  • Sumner, K.E., and T.J. Brown. 2015. Neurodiversity and human resource management: employer challenges for applicants and employees with learning disabilities. The Psychologist-Manager Journal 18(2): 77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurston, Allen. 2014. Disability, power and equality in school. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Higher Education 61(2): 105–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wazed, Shahid, and Eddy S.W. Ng. 2015. College recruiting using social media: how to increase applicant reach and reduce recruiting costs. Strategic HR Review 14(4): 135–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwick, R. 2004. Rethinking the SAT: The Future of Standardized Testing in University Admissions. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baker, D.L., Leonard, B. (2017). Tending the Gate: Admitting Students. In: Neuroethics in Higher Education Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59020-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics