Advertisement

Participation and Democracy in Theory and Practice

  • Rod Dacombe
Chapter
Part of the The Theories, Concepts and Practices of Democracy book series (PSTCD)

Abstract

This chapter outlines the main claims of participatory democracy in a way that makes sense in the context of the book. It distils some of the core elements of democratic thought in this area to focus on those aspects which are most problematic when faced with evidence over inequalities in participation. The chapter deals with three issues; (1) a brief outline of some of the core claims of participatory democracy, related to this, (2) an account of the significance of associational life for participatory democracy, and (3) a brief introduction to the complications brought about by the results of empirical work on participation and deprivation, which are dealt with in more detail in Chap.  3.

References

  1. Almond, G., & Verba, A. (1963). The civic culture: Civic attitudes and engagement in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baiocchi, G. (2005). Militants and citizens: The politics of participatory democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, S., et al. (2000). Political talk over here, over there, over time. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. (2013). Social networks and political participation. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J., & Rogers, J. (1995). Associations and democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  9. Davis Smith, J. (1998). The 1997 national survey of volunteering. London: National centre for Volunteering.Google Scholar
  10. Dean, R. (2016). Beyond radicalism and resignation: The competing logics for public participation in policy decisions policy and politics. Available PrePrint 18 January 2016, doi: 10.1332/030557316X14531466517034.
  11. Dearlove, J. (1973). The politics of policy in local government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Elster, J. (1986). The market and the forum: Three varieties of political theory. In J. Elster & A. Hylland (Eds.), Foundations of social choice theory (pp. 103–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Follett, M. P. (2013 [1924]). Creative experience. Eastford, CT: Martino Fine Books.Google Scholar
  15. Frederickson, H. G. (1982). The Recovery of Civicism in Public Administration Public Administration Review , 42(6), 501–508.Google Scholar
  16. Frederickson, H. G. (1991). Toward a theory of the public for public administration Administration & Society, 22(4), 395–417.Google Scholar
  17. Fung, A. (2003, December). Associations and democracy: Between theories, hopes and realities. Annual Review of Democracy, 29(1): 515–539.Google Scholar
  18. Fung, A. (2004). Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fung, A., & Wright, E. (Eds.). (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. Gastil, J. (1993). Democracy in small groups: Participation, decision making, and communication. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Gosnell, H. (1927). Getting out the vote. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hagen, I. (1992). Democratic communication: Media and social participation democratic communications in the information age, 16–27.Google Scholar
  24. Hayden, T. (1962). The Port Huron statement, The New Radicals: A report with documents. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  25. Hayden T. (2010). Movements Against Machiavellians: The Theory and Practice of Social Change New Political Science, 32(1): 123–134.Google Scholar
  26. Heller, P. (2001). Moving the state: The politics of democratic decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre. Politics & Society, 29(1), 131–163.Google Scholar
  27. Home Office (2004). 2003 Home Office Citizenship Survey: People, Families and Communities. London: Home Office research, Development and Statistic Directorate.Google Scholar
  28. Hirst, P. (1996). Associative democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kathlene, L. & Martin, J. (1991). Enhancing Citizen Participation: Panel Designs, Perspectives and Policy Formation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 10(1), 46–63.Google Scholar
  30. Key, V. (1949). Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  31. King, C. Feltey, K. & Susel, B. (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review, 58(4): 317–326.Google Scholar
  32. Lipset, S. (1960). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  33. Lippmann, W. (1997). Public opinion. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  35. Mansbridge, J. (1983). Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Mansbridge, J. (1999). Expanding the limits of deliberative democracy. In S. Macedo (Ed.), Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Mill, J. S. (2014 [1861]). Considerations on representative government. London: Creative Space Independent Publishing Platform. Google Scholar
  38. Moynihan, D. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington, D.C. American Review of Public Administration, 33(2), 164–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the citizenship and democratic deficits: Exploring the potential of deliberative democracy for public administration. American Review of Public Administration, 40(4), 376–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Neshkova, M., & Guo, H. (2012). Public participation and organizational performance: Evidence from state agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Newton, K. (1976). Second city politics: Democratic processes and decision-making in Birmingham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 7–19.Google Scholar
  44. Pattie, C., et al. (2003). Civic attitudes and engagement in modern Britain. Parliamentary Affairs, 56(4), 616–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Phillips, A. (1995). The politics of presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  46. Pierson, P., & Skocpol, T. (2007). The transformation of American politics: Activist government and the rise of conservatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Pitkin, H., & Shumer, S. M. (1982). On participation. Democracy, 2: 43–54.Google Scholar
  48. Piven, F., & Cloward, R. (1988). Why Americans don’t vote. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  49. Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. London: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rousseau, J. J. (1998 [1762]). The social contract. London: Wordsworth Editions. Google Scholar
  52. Sanders, L. (1997). Against Deliberation Political Theory, 25(3): 347–376.Google Scholar
  53. Schmitter, P., & Karl, T. (1991). What democracy is… and is not. Journal of Democracy, 2(3), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  55. Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, G., & Wales, C. (2000). Citizens’ juries and deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 48(1), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stivers, C. (1990). The public agency as Polls: Active citizenship in the administrative state. Administration & Society, 22(1), 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tingsten, H. (1937). Political Behavior: Studies in Election Statistics. London: P. S. King & Son.Google Scholar
  59. Verba, S., Schlozman, K., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Vieira, M., & Runciman, D. (2008). Representation. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  61. Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wampler, B. (2012). Entering the state: Civil society activism and participatory governance in Brazil. Political Studies, 60(2), 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Warren, M. E. (2001a). Democracy and association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Warren, M. R. (2001b). Dry bones rattling: Community building to revitalise American democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wilson, D. (1999). Exploring the limits of public participation in local government. Parliamentary Affairs, 52(2), 246–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson, D. & Game, C. (2011). Local government in the United Kingdom. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  67. Wolfe, J. (1985). A defense of participatory democracy. The Review of Politics, 47(3): 370–389.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rod Dacombe
    • 1
  1. 1.King’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations