Advertisement

Contested Extractivism, Society and the State: An Introduction

  • Kristina DietzEmail author
  • Bettina Engels
Chapter
Part of the Development, Justice and Citizenship book series (SIID)

Abstract

The recent global 'resource boom' manifests in a rise of national budgets as well as GDPs of many states. However, the trend towards extractivism as a development strategy across the global South has also social and political effects. When state revenues, growth and national well-being depend on resource extraction, societal and institutional norms and state–society relations are shaped in specific and contested ways. Struggles over land and mining have thus increased around the world, with a rising number of non-state and state actors being involved. This introduction outlines a framework of analysing struggles over land and mining in the context of global transformation processes as well as the relevance of these processes for state–society relations.

Keywords

Gold Mining Political Ecology Industrial Mining Society Relation Social Movement Organisation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akram-Lodhi, A. H., & Kay, C. (Eds.) (2009). Peasants and globalization: Political economy, rural transformation and the agrarian question. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Ballard, C., & Banks, G. (2003). Resource wars: The anthropology of mining. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 287–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bebbington, A. (Ed.) (2012). Social conflict, economic development and extractive industry. Evidence from South America. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bebbington, A., & Bury, J. (2013a). Political ecology of the subsoil. In A. Bebbington & J. Bury (Eds.), Subterranean struggles. New dynamics of mining, oil, and gas in Latin America (pp. 1–25). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bebbington, A., & Bury, J. (Eds.) (2013b). Subterranean struggles. New dynamics of mining, oil, and gas in Latin America. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bebbington, A., Hinojosa, L., Bebbington Humphreys, D., Burneo, M. L., & Warnaars, X. (2008). Contention and ambiguity: Mining and the possibilities of development. Development and Change, 39(6), 887–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernstein, H. (2010). Class dynamics of agrarian change. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Bierschenk, T. (2010). States at work in West Africa: Sedimentation, fragmentation and normative double-binds, Mainz: Arbeitspapier 113, Institut für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien der Johann Gutenberg Universität.Google Scholar
  10. Borras, S. M. (2009). Agrarian change and peasant studies: Changes, continuities and challenges – An introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borras, S. M., & Franco, J. C. (2013). Global land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. Third World Quarterly, 34(9), 1723–1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brand, U., & Dietz, K. (2014). (Neo-)Extraktivismus als Entwicklungsoption? Zu den aktuellen Dynamiken und Widersprüchen rohstoffbasierter Entwicklung in Lateinamerika. In F. Müller et al. (Eds.), Entwicklungstheorien: Weltgesellschaftliche Transformationen, entwicklungspolitische Herausforderungen, theoretische Innovationen. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Sonderheft 48 (pp. 128–165). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  13. Brenner, N., Jessop, B., Jones, M., & McLeod, G. (Eds.) (2003). State/space. A reader. Malden/Oxford/Victoria/Berlin: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Bridge, G. (2004). Mapping the bonanza: Geographies of mining investment in an era of neoliberal reform. The Professional Geographer, 56(3), 406–421.Google Scholar
  15. Burchardt, H.-J., Dietz, K., & Öhlschläger, R. (Eds.) (2013). Umwelt und Entwicklung im 21. Jahrhundert. Impulse und Analysen aus Lateinamerika. Baden Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  16. Bush, R. (2009). ‘Soon there will be no-one left to take the corpses to the morgue’: Accumulation and abjection in Ghana’s mining communities. Resources Policy, 34(1–2), 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clapp, J. (2014). Financialization, distance and global food politics. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(5), 797–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cotula, L. (2013). The great African land grab? Agricultural investments and the global food system. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  19. Deere, C. D., & Royce, F. S. (Eds.) (2009). Rural social movements in Latin America: Organizing for sustainable livelihoods. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  20. Dietz, K., Engels, B., & Pye, O. (2015a). Territoriality, scale and networks: The spatial dynamics of agrofuels. In K. Dietz et al. (Eds.), The political ecology of agrofuels (pp. 34–52). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Dietz, K., Engels, B., Pye, O., & Brunnengräber, A. (Eds.) (2015b). The political ecology of agrofuels. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Dueholm Rasch, E. (2012). Transformations in citizenship: Local resistance against mining projects in Huehuetenango (Guatemala). Journal of Developing Societies, 28(2), 159–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Engels, B. (2015). Contentious politics of scale: The global food price crisis and local protest in Burkina Faso. Social Movement Studies, 14(2), 180–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferry, E. (2016). Gold prices as material-social actors: The case of the London Gold Fix. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(1), 82–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gudynas, E. (2009). Diez tesis urgentes sobre el nuevo extractivismo. Contextos y demandas bajo el progresismo sudamericano actual. In J. Schuldt et al. (Eds.), Extractivismo, política y sociedad (pp. 187–225). Quito: CAAP, CLAES.Google Scholar
  26. Haarstad, H. (Ed) (2012). New political spaces in Latin American natural resource governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Haarstad, H., & Fløysand, A. (2007). Globalization and the power of rescaled narratives: A case of opposition to mining in Tambogrande, Peru. Political Geography, 26, 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hansen, T. B., & Stepputat, F. (2001). States of imagination. Durham/London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of capital. Towards a critical geography. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Hilson, G. (Ed.) (2006). Small-scale mining, rural subsistence and poverty in West Africa. Rugby: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  31. HWWI. (2015). HWWI-Index der Weltmarktpreise für Rohstoffe (US-$-Basis). http://hwwi-rohindex.de/typo3_upload/groups/32/hwwa_downloads/Rohstoffindex-dia.xls.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2015.
  32. ICMM (2014). The role of mining in national economies (2nd edition). Mining’s contribution to sustainable development. London: International Council on Mining & Metals.Google Scholar
  33. Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kitschelt, H. P. (1986). Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lang, M., & Mokrani, D. (Eds.) (2011). Más Allá del Desarrollo. Quito: Fundación Rosa Luxemburg, Abya Yala.Google Scholar
  36. Lange, S. (2008). Land tenure and mining in Tanzania. Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute (CMI).Google Scholar
  37. Larsson, V. (2014). E&MJ’s annual survey of global metal-mining investment. E&MJ Engineering and Mining Journal. http://www.e-mj.com/features/3674-e-mj-s-annual-survey-of-global-metal-mining-investment.html#.VlV427_1LCt. Accessed 25 Nov 2015.
  38. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford UK/Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Lund, C. (2011). Land rights and citizenship in Africa. In Discussion Paper 65. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.Google Scholar
  40. Luning, S. (2014). The future of artisanal miners from a large-scale perspective: From valued pathfinders to disposable illegals? Futures, 62, 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martín, F. (2013). Latin American political ecology and the world ecological crisis. Recent developments, contributions and dialogues with the global field, Paper presented at the 8th Pan-European conference on international relations, September 18–21 2013, Warsaw.Google Scholar
  42. Matondi, P. B., Havnevik, K., & Beyene, A. (Eds.) (2011). Biofuels, land grabbing and food security in Africa. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  43. Mayer, M. (2008). To what end do we theorize sociospatial relations? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 414–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meyer, D. S. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Migdal, J. S. (2003). State in society: Studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Migdal, J. S., & Schlichte, K. (2005). Rethinking the state. In K. Schlichte (Ed.), The dynamics of states. The formation and crises of state domination (pp. 1–40). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  47. Moyo, S. (2009). African land questions, agrarian transitions and the state: The contradictions of neo-liberal land reforms. Dakar: CODESRIA.Google Scholar
  48. Moyo, S., & Yeros, P. (Eds.) (2005). Reclaiming the land. The Resurgence of rural movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  49. Peluso, N. L., & Watts, M. (2001). Violent environments. In N. L. Peluso & M. Watts (Eds.), Violent environments (pp. 3–38). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Pye, O. (2010). The biofuel connection – Transnational activism and the palm oil boom. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(4), 851–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schlichte, K. (2006). Staatsbildung und Staatszerfall. Zur politischen Soziologie der Weltgesellschaft. In T. Bonacker & C. Weller (Eds.), Konflikte der Weltgesellschaft. Akteure – Strukturen – Dynamiken (pp. 197–220). Frankfurt a. M/New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  52. Svampa, M. (2012). Resource extractivism and alternatives: Latin American perspectives on development. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik (JEP), 28(3), 43–73.Google Scholar
  53. Svampa, M. (2015). Commodities consensus: Neoextractivism and enclosure of the commons in Latin America. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(1), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Svampa, M., & Antonelli, M. A. (Eds.) (2009). Minería transnacional, narrativas del desarrollo y resistencias sociales. Buenos Aires: Biblos.Google Scholar
  55. Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local. “Glocalization” and the politics of scale. In K. Cox (Ed.), Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 137–166). New York/London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  56. Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2009). Contentious politics and social movements. Series: Oxford Handbooks of Political Science.Google Scholar
  57. Tilly, C. (2006). Regimes and repertoires. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. G. (2007). Contentious politics. Boulder/London: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  59. Trouillot, M.-R. (2001). The anthropology of the state in the age of globalization: Close encounters of the deceptive kind. Current Anthropology, 42(1), 125–138.Google Scholar
  60. Urkidi, L. (2011). The defence of community in the anti-mining movement of Guatemala. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(4), 556–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vélez-Torres, I. (2014). Governmental extractivism in Colombia: Legislation, securitization and the local settings of mining control. Political Geography, 38, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Veltmeyer, H., & Petras, J. (Eds.) (2014). The new extractivism. A post-neoliberal development model or imperialism of the twenty-first century? London/New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  63. Walter, M. & Urkidi, L. (2015). Community mining consultations in Latin America (2002–2012): The contested emergence of a hybrid institution for participation. Geoforum, online, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.09.007.
  64. Wiener, A. (2014). A theory of contestation. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wissen, M. (2015). The political ecology of agrofuels: Conceptual remarks. In K. Dietz et al. (Eds.), The political ecology of agrofuels (pp. 16–33). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Latin American StudiesFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Otto Suhr Institute for Political ScienceFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations