Advertisement

Who Cares? The Unintended Consequences of Policy for Migrant Families

Chapter
  • 507 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter focuses on care and caregiving to examine the unintended consequences of policy for both settlement and transnational family relations. Migration—and even refugee policy—is rarely designed around care practices and needs. Yet, care and caregiving are often key drivers of mobility—increasingly visible in the ‘care-chains’ of the ‘global south’, but largely invisible in the temporary forms of mobility characteristic of the ‘global north’. When care is a central motivation for mobility women are the major actors involved, and hence the dramatic feminisation of migration, including domestic workers, middling migrants and flying grandmothers. A focus on the portability of care offers a fresh perspective on the more prominent political, economic and legal migration agendas, extending our assessment of migrant precarity.

Keywords

Care-chains Portability of care Policy Transnational family Mobility 

References

  1. Ariza, M. (2014). Care circulation, absence and affect in transnational families. In L. Baldassar & L. Merla (Eds.), Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: Understanding mobility and absence in family life (pp. 94–114). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2009). Future population and aging. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features10March%202009
  3. Australian Government. (2015). Intergenerational report: Australia in 2055. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.gov.au/PublicationsAndMedia/Publications/2015/2015-Intergenerational-Report/HTML
  4. Baldassar, L. (2011). Italian migrants in Australia and their relationship to Italy: Return visits, transnational caregiving and the second generation. Journal of Mediterranean Studies, 20(2), 1–28.Google Scholar
  5. Baldassar, L. (2016a). De-demonizing distance in mobile family lives: Co-presence, care circulation and polymedia as vibrant matter. Global Networks, 16(2), 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldassar, L. (2016b). Mobilities and communication technologies: Transforming care in family life. In M. Kilkey & E. Palenga-Moolenbeck (Eds.), Family life in an age of migration and mobility: Global perspectives through the life course. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  7. Baldassar, L. (2017). Transformations in transnational aged care: The case of Italians in Australia. In P. Dossa & C. Coe (Eds.), Transnational aging and kin-work. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Baldassar, L., Baldock, C. V., & Wilding, R. (2007). Families caring across borders: Migration, ageing, and transnational caregiving. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baldassar, L., & Merla, L. (2014). Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: Understanding mobility and absence in family life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Basch, L. G., Schiller, N. G., & Szanton Blanc, C. (1994). Nations unbound: Transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states. St. Louis: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
  11. Bauman, Z. (1998). Globalization: The human consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. BBC News. (2014). Romania and Bulgaria EU migration restrictions lifted. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-25565302
  13. Boehm, D. A. (2012). Intimate migrations: Gender, family, and illegality among transnational Mexicans. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brijnath, B. (2009). Familial bonds and boarding passes: Understanding caregiving in a transnational context. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 16(1), 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Callister, P., Didham, R., & Badkar, J. (2014). Ageing New Zealand: The growing reliance on migrant caregivers, a 2014 update. Working paper. Retrieved from http://callister.co.nz/aged-care-workers-nz-2014.pdf
  16. Callister, P., Tortell, L., & Williams, J. (2009). Paid domestic work: A private matter or a public policy issue? Insitute of Policy Studies working paper 09/02. Retrieved from http://ips.ac.nz/publications/files/ad978dc03e0.pdf
  17. Caspersz, D. (2014). Conceptualising work and belonging of temporary labour migrants in Australia. Mobilities & belonging across the lifecourse. Paper presented at the mobilities and belonging symposium, 3–4 November, UWA, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
  18. Castles, S. (2002). Migration and community formation under conditions of globalization. International Migration Review, 36(4), 1143–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chomik, R., & MacLennan, M. (2014). Aged care in Australia: Part I – Policy, demand and funding. CEPAR research brief 2014/01. Retrieved from http://www.cepar.edu.au/media/133377/aged_care_in_australia_-_part_i_-_resupply__v3_proof.pdf
  20. Clifford, S. A. (2009). The effects of fly-in/fly-out commute arrangements and extended working hours on the stress, lifestyle, relationships and health characteristics of Western Australian mining employees and their partners. (Ph.D.), University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Department of Immigration and Border Protection. (2013). Asylum trends Australia; 2012–13 (Annual publication). Retrieved from https://www.border.gov.au/ReportsandPublications/Documents/statistics/asylum-trends-aus-2012-13.pdf
  22. DW. (2014). EU opens doors to Romanian and Bulgarian workers. Retrieved from http://www.dw.com/en/eu-opens-doors-to-romanian-and-bulgarian-workers/a-17335948
  23. Ehrenreich, B., & Hochschild, A. R. (2003). Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy (1st ed.). New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  24. Elliott, A., & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Faist, T. (2000). The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Favell, A., Feldblum, M., & Smith, M. P. (2007). The human face of global mobility: A research agenda. Society, 44(2), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Finch, J., & Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. London/New York: Tavistock/Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fine, M. D., & Mitchell, A. (2007). Immigration and the aged care workforce in Australia: Meeting the deficit. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 26(4), 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fisher, B., & Tronto, J. (1990). Towards a feminist theory of caring. In E. K. Abel & M. K. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives (pp. 35–62). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hawthorne, L. (2005). Picking winners: The recent transformation of Australia’s skilled migration policy. International Migration Review, 39(3), 663–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hochschild, A. (2003). Love and gold. In B. Ehrenreich & A. R. Hochschild (Eds.), Global woman: Nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy (1st ed., pp. 15–30). New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  32. Hochschild, A. (2005). Love and gold. In L. Ricciutelli, A. R. Miles, & M. McFadden (Eds.), Feminist politics, activism and vision: Local and global challenges (pp. 34–46). Toronto, Canada/London/New York: Inanna Publications and Education; Zed.Google Scholar
  33. Holmes, M. (2006). Love lives at a distance: Distance relationships over the lifecourse. Sociological Research Online, 11(3). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/11/3/holmes.html
  34. Howe, A. L. (2009). Migrant care workers or migrants working in long-term care? A review of Australian experience. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 21(4), 374–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Howell, S. (2003). Kinning: The creation of life trajectories in transnational adoptive families. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(3), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huang, S., Thang, L. L., & Toyota, M. (2012). Transnational mobilities for care: Rethinking the dynamics of care in Asia. Global Networks, 12(2), 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hugo, G. (2003). Circular migration: Keeping development rolling? Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/circular-migration-keeping-development-rolling/
  38. Hugo, G. (2007). Contextualising the ‘crisis in aged care’ in Australia: A demographic perspective. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42(2), 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hugo, G. (2009a). Best practice in temporary labour migration for development: A perspective from Asia and the Pacific. International Migration, 47(5), 23–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hugo, G. (2009b). Care worker migration, Australia and development. Population, Space and Place, 15(2), 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Isaksen, L. W., Devi, S. U., & Hochschild, A. R. (2008). Global care crisis: A problem of capital, care chain, or commons? American Behavioral Scientist, 52(3), 405–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Khoo, S.-E. (2012). Ethnic disparities in social and economic well-being of the immigrant aged in Australia. Journal of Population Research, 29(2), 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kneebone, S., Stevens, D., & Baldassar, L. (2014). Refugee protection and the role of law: Conflicting identities. Abingdon, UK/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Kofman, E., & Raghuram, P. (2009). Skilled female labour migration. Focus migration policy brief no.13. Retrieved from http://focus-migration.hwwi.de/typo3_upload/groups/3/focus_Migration_Publikationen/Kurzdossiers/PB_13_skilled_fem_l_m.pdf
  45. Lutz, H., & Palenga-Möllenbeck, E. (2012). Care workers, care drain, and care chains: Reflections on care, migration, and citizenship. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 19(1), 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Pe-Pua, R., Mitchell, C., Castles, S., & Iredale, R. (1998). Astronaut families and parachute children: Hong Kong immigrants in Australia. In E. Sinn (Ed.), The last half century of Chinese overseas (pp. 279–298). Aberdeen, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, HKU.Google Scholar
  49. Razavi, S. (2011). Rethinking care in a development context: An introduction. Development and Change, 42(4), 873–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sahlins, M. D. (2013). What kinship is – And is not. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salami, B., Nelson, S., Hall, L. M., Muntaner, C., & Hawthorne, L. (2014). Workforce integration of Philippine-educated nurses who migrate to Canada through the Live-in Caregiver Program. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 46(4), 65–82.Google Scholar
  52. Saxenian, A. (2005). From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schier, M. (2015). Post-separation families: Spatial mobilities and the need to manage multi-local everyday life. In Spatial mobility, migration, and living arrangements (pp. 205–224). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Sevenhuijsen, S. (2003). The place of care the relevance of the feminist ethic of care for social policy. Feminist Theory, 4(2), 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Souralová, A. (2015). New perspectives on mutual dependency in care-giving. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd..Google Scholar
  56. Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  57. Syed, J. (2008). Employment prospects for skilled migrants: A relational perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 18(1), 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Tronto, J. (2005). Care as the work of citizens: A modest proposal. In M. Friedman (Ed.), Women and citizenship (pp. 130–145). Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tronto, J. (2011). A feminist democratic ethics of care and global care workers. Citizenship and responsibility. In R. Mahon & F. Robinson (Eds.), Feminist ethics and social policy: Towards a new global political economy of care (pp. 162–177). Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  61. World Summit of Information Society (WSIS). (2003). Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/net/wsis/index.html
  62. Yeates, N. (2012). Global care chains: A-state-of-the-art review and future directions in care transnationalization research. Global Networks, 12(2), 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Sciences, Faculty of ArtsUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations