Bailout Countries and Others in 2014: Austerity and Government Defection
- 467 Downloads
The notion that domestic responses to financial crises are constrained in a way that limits the options available to national governments is not new. However, the European Parliamentary (EP) term that ended in 2014 was a period when this reality was brought home to European electorates with previously unseen potency. This study explores the implications of this for the logic of voting in the 2014 EP elections. Defection from government parties in EP elections is known to result from a combination of sincere/ideological and performance/protest voting logics. However, this study argues that fiscal tightening policies functioned, in the most affected countries, as a signal leading voters to discount the ideological positions of parties and to behave mostly under a purely protest logic.
Keywordseconomic crisis • bailout • protest voting • sincere voting
- Alesina, A., Carloni, D., & Lecce, G. (2013). The electoral consequences of large fiscal adjustments. In A. Alesina & F. Giavazzi (Eds.), Fiscal policy after the financial crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Ban, C. (2013). From cocktail to dependence: The great recession and the transformation of Romanian capitalism. Europe–Asia Studies. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2215124 (webpage consulted May 2016).
- Barbieri, G. (2015). Eurosceptic party performances in the 2014 European elections. The European Parties Elections and Referendums Network (EPERN). Available at: https://epern.wordpress.com/2015/06/22/eurosceptic-party-performances-in-the-2014-european-elections.
- Carnot, N., & de Castro, F. (2015). The discretionary fiscal effort: An assessment of fiscal policy and its output effect. European Commission, Economic Papers, 543.Google Scholar
- Eijk, C. v. d., Franklin, M. N., Ackaert, J., et al. (1996). Choosing Europe? The European electorate and national politics in the face of the union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
- Emanuele, V., Maggini, N., & Marino, B.. (2014). Gaining votes in Europe against Europe? The electoral performance of anti-EU parties in the 2014 European elections. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference in Glasgow, 3–6 September 2014. Google Scholar
- Moravcsik, A. (2012). Europe after the crisis. Foreign Affairs, 91(3).Google Scholar
- Oppenhuis, E. (1995). Voting behavior in Europe: A comparative analysis of electoral participation and party choice. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar
- Pepinsky, T. B. (2014). Financial crises and the politics of adjustment and reform. In T. Oatlley & W. K. Winecoff (Eds.), Handbook of the international political economy of monetary relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Rae, G. (2012). Austerity policies in Europe: The case of Poland. Berlin: FES International. International Policy Analysis. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
- Reif, K. (1985). Ten second order national elections. In K. Reif (Ed.), Ten European elections. Campaigns and results of the 1979/81 first direct elections to the European parliament. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
- Rose, R., & McAllister, I. (1992). Expressive versus instrumental voting. In D. Kavanagh (Ed.), Electoral politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Sánchez-Cuenca, I. (2008). How can governments be accountable if voters vote ideologically. In J. M. Maravall & I. Sánchez-Cuenca (Eds.), Controlling goverments: Voters, institutions and accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Schmitt, H., & Thomassen, A. (1999). Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Schulten, T., & Müller, T. (2012). A new European interventionism? The impact of the new European economic governance on wages and collective bargaining. In S. Natali & D. Vanhercke (Eds.), Social developments in the EU 2012. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.Google Scholar
- Stoiciu, V. (2012). Austerity and structural reforms in Romania. Berlin: FES International. International Policy Analysis. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
- Voeten, E. (2009). Enlargement and the ‘normal’ European parliament. In J. J. A. Thomassen (Ed.), The legitimacy of the European Union after enlargement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar