Advertisement

Bailout Countries and Others in 2014: Austerity and Government Defection

  • Pedro C. Magalhães
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

The notion that domestic responses to financial crises are constrained in a way that limits the options available to national governments is not new. However, the European Parliamentary (EP) term that ended in 2014 was a period when this reality was brought home to European electorates with previously unseen potency. This study explores the implications of this for the logic of voting in the 2014 EP elections. Defection from government parties in EP elections is known to result from a combination of sincere/ideological and performance/protest voting logics. However, this study argues that fiscal tightening policies functioned, in the most affected countries, as a signal leading voters to discount the ideological positions of parties and to behave mostly under a purely protest logic.

Keywords

economic crisis • bailout • protest voting • sincere voting 

References

  1. Alesina, A., Carloni, D., & Lecce, G. (2013). The electoral consequences of large fiscal adjustments. In A. Alesina & F. Giavazzi (Eds.), Fiscal policy after the financial crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Armingeon, K., & Baccaro, L. (2012). Political economy of the sovereign debt crisis: The limits of internal devaluation. Industrial Law Journal, 41(3), 254–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armingeon, K., & Giger, N. (2008). Conditional punishment: A comparative analysis of the electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment in OECD nations, 1980–2003. West European Politics, 31(3), 558–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker, R., De Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., & Vachudova, M. A. (2015). Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics, 21(1), 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ban, C. (2013). From cocktail to dependence: The great recession and the transformation of Romanian capitalism. Europe–Asia Studies. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2215124 (webpage consulted May 2016).
  6. Barbieri, G. (2015). Eurosceptic party performances in the 2014 European elections. The European Parties Elections and Referendums Network (EPERN). Available at: https://epern.wordpress.com/2015/06/22/eurosceptic-party-performances-in-the-2014-european-elections.
  7. Brug, W. v. d., Franklin, M. N., & Tóka, G. (2008). One electorate or many? Differences in party preference formation between new and established European democracies. Electoral Studies, 27(4), 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carnot, N., & de Castro, F. (2015). The discretionary fiscal effort: An assessment of fiscal policy and its output effect. European Commission, Economic Papers, 543.Google Scholar
  9. Eijk, C. v. d., Franklin, M. N., Ackaert, J., et al. (1996). Choosing Europe? The European electorate and national politics in the face of the union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  10. Emanuele, V., Maggini, N., & Marino, B.. (2014). Gaining votes in Europe against Europe? The electoral performance of anti-EU parties in the 2014 European elections. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference in Glasgow, 3–6 September 2014. Google Scholar
  11. Giger, N., & Nelson, M. (2011). The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity? European Journal of Political Research, 50(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall, P. A. (2012). The economics and politics of the Euro crisis. German Politics, 21(4), 355–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hellwig, T. (2008). Globalization, policy constraints, and vote choice. Journal of Politics, 70(4), 1128–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hibbs, D. A. (1994). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. The American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1467–1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobolt, S. B., & Spoon, J. J. (2012). Motivating the European voter: Parties, issues and campaigns in European parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research, 51(6), 701–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hobolt, S. B., Spoon, J. J., & Tilley, J. (2009). A vote against Europe? Explaining defection at the 1999 and 2004 European parliament elections. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Indridason, I. H. (2014). The collapse: Economic considerations in vote choice in Iceland. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24(2), 134–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kedar, O. (2005). When moderate voters prefer extreme parties: Policy balancing in parliamentary elections. American Political Science Review, 99(2), 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kiewiet, D. R. (1981). Policy-oriented voting in response to economic issues. American Political Science Review, 75(02), 448–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Magalhães, P. C. (2014). The elections of the great recession in Portugal: Performance voting under a blurred responsibility for the economy. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24(2), 180–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mair, P., & Thomassen, J. (2010). Political representation and government in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(1), 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marsh, M. (1998). Testing the second order election model after four European elections. British Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 591–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marsh, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2014). A conservative revolution: The electoral response to economic crisis in Ireland. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 24(2), 160–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moravcsik, A. (2012). Europe after the crisis. Foreign Affairs, 91(3).Google Scholar
  25. Oppenhuis, E. (1995). Voting behavior in Europe: A comparative analysis of electoral participation and party choice. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar
  26. Pepinsky, T. B. (2014). Financial crises and the politics of adjustment and reform. In T. Oatlley & W. K. Winecoff (Eds.), Handbook of the international political economy of monetary relations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  27. Rae, G. (2012). Austerity policies in Europe: The case of Poland. Berlin: FES International. International Policy Analysis. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  28. Reif, K. (1985). Ten second order national elections. In K. Reif (Ed.), Ten European elections. Campaigns and results of the 1979/81 first direct elections to the European parliament. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  29. Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rohrschneider, R., & Whitefield, S. (2016). Responding to growing European Union-skepticism? The stances of political parties toward European integration in Western and Eastern Europe following the financial crisis. European Union Politics, 17(1), 138–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rose, R., & McAllister, I. (1992). Expressive versus instrumental voting. In D. Kavanagh (Ed.), Electoral politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sánchez-Cuenca, I. (2008). How can governments be accountable if voters vote ideologically. In J. M. Maravall & I. Sánchez-Cuenca (Eds.), Controlling goverments: Voters, institutions and accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Schmitt, H., & Thomassen, A. (1999). Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Schulten, T., & Müller, T. (2012). A new European interventionism? The impact of the new European economic governance on wages and collective bargaining. In S. Natali & D. Vanhercke (Eds.), Social developments in the EU 2012. Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.Google Scholar
  35. Stoiciu, V. (2012). Austerity and structural reforms in Romania. Berlin: FES International. International Policy Analysis. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  36. Tufte, E. R. (1975). Determinants of the outcomes of midterm congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 69(3), 812–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Voeten, E. (2009). Enlargement and the ‘normal’ European parliament. In J. J. A. Thomassen (Ed.), The legitimacy of the European Union after enlargement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wright, J. R. (2012). Unemployment and the democratic electoral advantage. American Political Science Review, 106(04), 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro C. Magalhães
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LisbonLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations