Abstract
Ebru Soytemel’s chapter focuses on the Fikirtepe Urban Transformation Project (FUTP) in Istanbul—the so-called Manhattan-Istanbul Project—as a case study of how different policies and strategies of public/private institutions/companies create uncertainties in housing markets, of how they manage projects and succeed in speculative gains through the social construction of ignorance and exclusion of uncomfortable knowledge. She explores how local dwellers develop counteractions to resist or to adapt to the consequences of these neoliberal place-making processes. The chapter discusses the role and function of ‘mobilising unknowns’ and ‘strategic ignorance’ for different groups, and scrutinises how different tactics and strategies are developed by different actors during the neoliberalisation of the city space.
The fieldwork for this project was funded by the Oxford Programme for the Future of Cities at the University of Oxford, UK. I would also like to say thanks to Leyla Şimsek for her support for this project, and Metin Ofluoğlu and Murat Şensu for allowing me to use their photographs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Kadıköy is one of the oldest, largest and most populous districts of Istanbul. According to the 2011 census, the population of Kadıköy was 531,997 persons living in 19 neighbourhoods. According to the results of a census in 2008, it is the wealthiest district among the 39 districts in Istanbul. At the time of writing, the mayor was Selami Öztürk, from CHP (Republican People’s Party), the main opposition party, who held the post since the mid-1990s.
- 2.
The project covers 150 hectares and 4500 parcels where 95 per cent of the land is privately owned and the remaining 5 per cent belongs to IMM and other public institutions.
- 3.
Until 2013, the key state actors such as the Mass Housing Administration of Turkey (TOKI), Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning did not have any role in the FUTP. In 2013, in order to solve the ongoing problems and slow progress of the project, the Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning decided to include Fikirtepe as one of the disaster risk areas within the scope of the Law on Disaster Prevention and Transformation of High Risk Areas (no. 6306). With this decision the Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning became an important actor for the following years of the project, thus taking over the role of Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality.
- 4.
Bourdieu defines fields as ‘structured spaces of positions’ (1990, 72) and ‘the network of objective relations between positions’ (1993, 30). Different positions (social actors’ strategies or position takings) in each field encompass each actor’s struggles ‘to defend or improve their positions’. Each actor’s position is linked to the power relations in that field and every position taking is defined ‘in relation to space of possibles’ (ibid.).
- 5.
- 6.
Fake building contractors who are referred to as ‘Bagmen’.
- 7.
Fikirtepe used to be one of the squatter housing areas in Istanbul until 1970s. Following the master plan of Kadikoy in 1972, the construction of the first Bosphorus Bridge and the construction of the Trans European Motorway and also amnesty laws within the following years which included amnesty clauses for gecekondus and/or unauthorised buildings, contributed to changing demographic composition and the ownership structure of the neighbourhood. During the fieldwork , almost all of the homeowners I talked to had legal titles for their properties; however, these titles were land titles (toprak tapusu), which secured a joint-ownership of the land instead of a freehold of a flat. Compared to the freehold of a flat, in joint-ownership properties, co-owners have shares and the price of these flats is much cheaper.
- 8.
Ataşehir is a suburban district on the Anatolian side of Istanbul. The district is well known for its luxurious skyscraper condominiums and hosting offices and headquarters of big companies.
- 9.
The research network ‘Networks of Dispossession’ in Turkey provides evidence and data about the networks between the construction companies and the politicians. Different research findings provided by this network show that in Turkey big construction projects involve companies who have connections with the current government or connections with politicians from the ruling party. For further information, see http://mulksuzlestirme.org.
- 10.
During my fieldwork , Fikirtepe dwellers, especially homeowners were expressing their discontent with the district municipality—Kadıköy Municipality. They were blaming the poor physical conditions of the neighbourhood on the inadequate services of the district municipality. However, this narrative needs to be assessed with considerations of the political power dynamics between Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (IMM) and Kadıköy Municipality. Since the 1990s, the mayor of Kadıköy had been from the main opposition party. Kadıköy Municipality was considered by the homeowners as a weak or an ineffective actor in shaping or governing urban policies. Compared to the district municipality, IMM, whose major was from the ruling party and clearly had connections with the central government, and was acclaimed by the homeowners for the future of FUTP as a powerful actor who could deal with the obstacles the project might face.
References
Best, Jacqueline. 2012. Bureaucratic Ambiguity. Economy and Society 41 (1): 84–106.
Biehl, Kristen. 2015. Governing Through Uncertainty: Experiences of Being a Refugee in Turkey as a Country for Temporary Asylum. Social Analysis 59 (1): 57–75.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.
———. 1990 [1980]. Sociology in Question. Cambridge: Polity.
———. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 2005. The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge: Polity.
Brenner, Neil, and Nik Theodore. 2002. Cities and the Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism”. Antipode 34 (3): 349–379.
Derickson, Kate Driscoll. 2016. Resilience Is Not Enough. City 20 (1): 161–166.
Erdi-Lelandais, Gülçin. 2014. Space and Identity in Resistance Against Neoliberal Urban Planning in Turkey. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (5): 1785–1806.
Galison, Peter. 2004. Removing Knowledge. Critical Inquiry 31 (1): 229–243.
Harvey, David. 2007. The Neoliberal State. In A Brief History of Neoliberalism, 64–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Karaman, Ozan. 2010. Remaking Space for Globalization: Dispossession Through Urban Renewal in Istanbul, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Minnesota.
———. 2013. Urban Renewal in Istanbul: Reconfigured Spaces, Robotic Lives. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (2): 715–733.
———. 2014. Resisting Urban Renewal in Istanbul. Urban Geography 35 (2): 290–310.
MacKinnon, Danny, and Kate Driscoll Derickson. 2013. From Resilience to Resourcefulness: A Critique of Resilience Policy and Activism. Progress in Human Geography 37 (2): 253–270.
McGoey, Linsey. 2012a. Strategic Unknowns: Towards a Sociology of Ignorance. Economy and Society 41 (1): 1–16.
———. 2012b. The Logic of Strategic Ignorance. The British Journal of Sociology 63 (3): 553–576.
Rayner, Steve. 2012. Uncomfortable Knowledge: The Social Construction of Ignorance in Science and Environmental Policy Discourses. Economy and Society 41 (1): 107–125.
Ren, Xuefei, and Liza Weinstein. 2013. Urban Governance, Mega-Projects, and Scalar Transformations in China and India. In Locating Right to the City in the Global South, ed. T.R. Samara, T.R. He, and G. Chen, 107–126. London: Routledge.
Sakızlıoğlu, Bahar. 2014. Inserting Temporality into the Analysis of Displacement: Living Under the Threat of Displacement. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 105 (2): 206–220.
Şen, Besime. 2009. Kentsel Dönüşüm: Kavramsal Karmaşa ve Neoliberalizm. İktisat Dergisi 499: 37–48.
———. 2010. Kaybetmeden Mücadele Etme Arayışı: Gülsuyu-Gülensu ve Başıbüyük Deneyimleri. In Tarih, Sınıflar ve Kent, 309–354. Ankara: Dipnot Yayınları.
Smithson, Michael. 1989. Ignorance and Uncertainty, Emerging Paradigms. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Swyngedouw, Erik. 2009. The Antinomies of the Post-Political City: In Search of a Democratic Politics of Environmental Production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33 (3): 601–620.
Swyngedouw, Erik, Frank Moulaert, and Arantxa Rodriguez. 2002. Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large-Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy. Antipode 34 (3): 542–577.
Vakfı, Tarih. 1994. Dünden Bugüne İstanbul Ansiklopedisi. İstanbul: Türkiye ve Ekonomik Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı, Cilt 4: 329.
Walker, Jeremy, and Melinda Cooper. 2011. Genealogies of Resilience: From Systems Ecology to the Political Economy of Crisis Adaptation. Security Dialogue 42 (2): 143–160.
Newspapers
HaberTurk. 2016. Fikirtepe 15 gune zor baslar. http://www.haberturk.com/gundem/haber/916046-fikirtepe-15-gune-zor-baslar. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
IBB. 2011. Fikirtepe Donusumden Cok Memnun. http://www.ibb.gov.tr/tr-TR/Pages/Haber.aspx?NewsID=19102#.VvFIvMfPyCQ. Accessed 5 Dec 2015.
Milliyet. 2014. Fikirtepe’de Imar Hareketliligi. http://www.milliyet.com.tr/fikirtepe-de-imar-hareketliligi-konut-1845385/. Accessed 14 Jan 2016.
Posta. 2011. Fikirtepeli’ye Piyango Vurdu [Online], 22 October 2011. http://www.posta.com.tr/ekonomi/HaberDetay/Fikirtepeli_ye_piyango_vurdu.htm?ArticleID=97230. Accessed 15 Apr 2012.
Star. 2010. Fikirtepe’ye piyangi vurdu, 20 October 2010. http://www.stargazete.com/ekonomi/fikirtepe-ye-piyango-vurdu-haber-3. Accessed 5 Apr 2013.
Vatan. 2010. Piyango Onlara Vurdu, 20 October 2010. http://www.gazetevatan.com/piyango-onlara-vurdu--335582-gundem/. Accessed July 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soytemel, E. (2017). Urban Rent Speculation, Uncertainty and Unknowns as Strategy and Resistance in Istanbul’s Housing Market . In: Erdi, G., Şentürk, Y. (eds) Identity, Justice and Resistance in the Neoliberal City. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58632-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58632-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-58631-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-58632-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)