Respect and Inclusion

  • Alexandra L. Adame
  • Matthew Morsey
  • Ronald Bassman
  • Kristina Yates
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the interrelated themes of respect and inclusion, and the authors discuss them in light of past research, their involvement with the psychiatric survivor movement, and in their clinical practice as well. Throughout the chapter, respect for the diversity of the human condition is expressed in various ways, including contextual understanding of experience rather than singular modes of knowing, tolerance for ambiguity, and valuing of lived experience as an important aspect of being a healer. Finally, we explore how societal intolerance for ambiguity and behaviors that deviate from the norm have made genuine inclusion difficult for people labeled with mental illness.

References

  1. Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (2004). Service users and practitioners reunited: The key component for social work reform. British Journal of Social Work, 34, 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beresford, P., & Menzies, R. (2014). Developing partnerships in resist psychiatry within academia. In B. Burstow, B. A. LeFrancois, & S. Diamond (Eds.), Psychiatry disrupted: Theorizing resistance and crafting the (R)evolution (pp. 77–95). Montreal, Québec: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bielas, H., Barra, S., Skrivanek, C., Aebi, M., Steinhausen, H. C., Bessler, C., & Plattner, B. (2016). The associations of cumulative adverse childhood experience and irritability with mental disorders in detained male adolescent offenders. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 10, 34–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd, J. E., Katz, E. P., Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. (2010). The relationship of multiple aspects of stigma and personal contact with someone hospitalized for mental illness, in a nationally representative sample. Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buber, M. (1958). I and thou. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  6. Buber, M. (1965). Between man and man. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  7. Cooper, D. (1967/2013). Psychiatry and anti-psychiatry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Crossley, N. (2002). Repertoires of contention and tactical diversity in the UK psychiatric survivors movement: The question of appropriation. Social Movement Studies, 1(1), 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doestoevsky, F. (1862/1985). The house of the dead. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Everett, B. (1994). Something is happening: The contemporary consumer and psychiatric survivor movement in historical context. The Journal of Mind and Behaviour, 15, 55–70.Google Scholar
  11. Everett, B. (1998). Participation or exploitation? Consumers and psychiatric survivors as partners in planning mental health services. International Journal of Mental Health, 27, 80–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Everett, B. (2000). A fragile revolution: Consumers and psychiatric survivors confront the power of the mental health system. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Forchuck, C., Ward-Griffin, C., Csiernik, R., & Turner, K. (2006). Surviving the tornado of mental illness: Psychiatric survivors’ experiences of getting, losing, and keeping housing. Psychiatric Services, 57, 558–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuller-Thomson, E., Baird, S. L., Dhrodia, R., & Brennenstuhl, S. (2016). The association between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and suicide attempts in a population-based study. Child: Care, Health and Development, 42(5), 725–734.Google Scholar
  15. Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (2014). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Laing, R. D. (1960). The divided self: An existential study of sanity and madness. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. Lawn, S. (2015). Integrating service user participation into mental health care: What will it take? International Journal of Integrated Care, 15, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. May, R. (1967). Psychology and the human dilemma. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. McAllister, M., & Walsh, K. (2004). Different voices: Reviewing and revising the politics of working with consumers in mental health. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 13, 22–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Morrison, L. J. (2005). Talking back to psychiatry: The psychiatric consumer/survivor/ex-patient movement. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Neil, S. T., Price, J., Pitt, L., Welford, M., Nothard, S., Sellwood, W., et al. (2015). Working together: Service users and researchers in psychosis research. Psychosis: Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches, 5(3), 306–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nelson, G., Lord, J., & Ochocka, J. (2001). Empowerment and mental health in the community: Narratives of psychiatric consumer/survivors. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pournaghash-Tehrani, S., & Feizabadi, Z. (2009). Predictability of physical and psychological violence by early adverse childhood experiences. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  25. Russo, J., & Rose, D. (2013). But what if nobody’s going to sit down and have a real conversation with you? Journal of Public Mental Health, 12(4), 184–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sartre, J. P. (1956). Being and nothingness: A phenomenological essay on ontology. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  27. Telford, R., & Faulkner, A. (2004). Learning about service user involvement in mental health research. Journal of Mental Health, 13(6), 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra L. Adame
    • 1
  • Matthew Morsey
    • 2
  • Ronald Bassman
    • 3
  • Kristina Yates
    • 4
  1. 1.Seattle UniversitySeattleUSA
  2. 2.Private PracticeSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Private PracticeBoulderUSA
  4. 4.RetiredOaklandUSA

Personalised recommendations