Advertisement

Human Development, Capabilities and Graduate Employability

  • Melanie Walker
  • Samuel Fongwa
Chapter

Abstract

Our research drew on documentary, quantitative and qualitative data and uniquely considered the multiple perspectives of students – black and white, male and female, middle and working class, urban and rural and studying different programmes – as well as university staff and employers across four different kinds of South African universities. We situated these voices in the history, policy and context of South Africa so that graduate employability as we understand it is a function of complex intersecting and co-determining factors. For the most part where real efforts were being made to provide a quality education in the case study universities, these efforts were closer to Fraser’s (2009) affirmative strategy than to transformation.

Keywords

Social Capital Social Entrepreneurship Capability Approach High Education Policy British Council 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Boni, A., & Walker, M. (2016). Universities and global human development: Theoretical and empirical insights for social change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. British Council. (2014). Mobilising the humanities. http://bit.ly/1ibL1ND/. Accessed 1 August 2016.
  3. British Council. (2016). Universities, employability and inclusive development: Repositioning higher education in Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa. http://wwww.britishcouncil.org/education/ihe/. Accessed 1 July 2016.
  4. De Swaan, A., Manor, J., Oyen, E., & Reis, E. P. (2000). Elite perceptions of the poor; reflections for a comparative research project. Current Sociology, 48(91), 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fraser, N. (2009). Scales of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Guzman-Valenzuela, C. (2016). Unfolding the meaning of public(s) in universities: Towards the transformative university. Higher Education, 71, 667–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kupfer, A. (2011). Towards a theoretical framework for the comparative understanding of globalisation, higher education, the labour market and inequality. Journal of Social Work Education, 24(1), 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nussbaum, M. (2010). Not for profit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. O’Neill, O. (1996). Towards justice and virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Panyane, M. (2016, June 3). Young, black, educated, jobless. City Press.Google Scholar
  12. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  14. Therborn, G. (2013). The killing fields of inequality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Walker, M., & McLean, M. (2013). Professional education. Routledge, London and New York: Capabilities and the Public Good.Google Scholar
  16. Wisor, S., Bessell, S., Castillo, F., Crawford, J., Donaghue, K., Hunt, J., Alison Jaggar, A., Liu, A., & Pogge, T. (2016). The individual deprivation measure. Melbourne: International Women’s Development Agency.Google Scholar
  17. Wolff, J., & De-Shalit, A. (2007). Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melanie Walker
    • 1
  • Samuel Fongwa
    • 2
  1. 1.University of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa
  2. 2.University of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations