Advertisement

The Cyborg Subject: An Introduction

  • Garfield Benjamin
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter sets forward the context, conceptual framework and cultural application of a new mode of viewing the contemporary subject as a cyborg. Emphasising the engaged role of consciousness, the cyborg is defined as the expansion of the human mind by digital technology. The split between physical and digital worlds that constitutes the hybrid nature of the cyborg is outlined as a parallax shift between two modes of thought and two realities. The nature of this shift is constructed by the relative alignments of four functions of consciousness: Existence, Meaning, Real and Virtual. This functional framework is applied to cultural depictions of the parallax split between physical and digital worlds as modes of thought, as a means of expressing the technologically mediated experience of the contemporary subject.

Keywords

Virtual Reality Physical World Digital Technology Human Consciousness Digital World 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ascott, R. 2005. Syncretic Reality: Art, Process, and Potentiality. DRAINMAG 2(2).Google Scholar
  2. Ashby, W. 1957. An Introduction to Cybernetics. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Banks, I. M. 2008. Excession. London: Kindle editionHachette.Google Scholar
  4. Bard, A., and J. Söderqvist. 2012. The Futurica Trilogy: The Netocrats; The Global Empire; The Body Machines. Stockholm: Kindle editionStockholm Text.Google Scholar
  5. Baudrillard, J. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  6. ——— 2005. The Intelligence of Evil or the Lucidity Pact. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  7. Bohm, D. 1994. Thought as a System. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. ——— 2002. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Bostrom, N. 2002. Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. ——— 2003. Are You Living in a Computer Simulation? Philosophical Quarterly 53(211): 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, J.R., and P.C.W. Davies, eds. 1986. The Ghost in the Atom: A Discussion of the Mysteries of Quantum Physics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Card, O.S. 1985. Ender’s Game. New York: Tor.Google Scholar
  13. Cline, E. 2015. Armada. London: Kindle editionCornerstone Digital.Google Scholar
  14. Creeber, G., and R. Martin. 2009. Digital Cultures: Understanding New Media. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  15. DeLanda, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  16. Deleuze, G. 2004b. The Logic of Sense. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 2004a. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  18. D’Ignazio, F. 1986. What is COMPUTE! Doing Here? Compute! Magazine, 079 December, 90.Google Scholar
  19. Engelbart, D. 1962. Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework. Summary Report AFOSR-3233.Google Scholar
  20. Everett, H. 1973. The Theory of the Universal Wave Function. In The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Physics, eds. B.S. DeWitt, and N. Graham. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gane, N., and D. Beer. 2008. New Media: The Key Concepts. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  22. Gibson, W. 1995a. Neuromancer. London: Voyager.Google Scholar
  23. Gunkel, D.J. 2010. The Real Problem: Avatars, Metaphysics and Online Social Interaction. New Media & Society 12: 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansen, M. 2004. New Philosophy for New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. ——— 2006. Bodies in Code: Interfaces with Digital Media. New York; Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Haraway, D. 1985. Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review 80: 65–108.Google Scholar
  27. ——— 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Hayles, N.K. 1999. How We Became Posthuman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ——— 2005. My Mother was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. ——— 2010. How We Became Posthuman: Ten Years on an Interview with N. Katherine Hayles. Paragraph 33(3): 318–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ——— 2012. How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heim, M. 1993. The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Heisenberg, W. 1949. The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  34. Ihde, D. 2012. Can Continental Philosophy Deal with the New Technologies? Journal of Speculative Philosophy 26(2): 321–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jameson, F. 2007. Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  36. Kozel, S. 2007. Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lacan, J. 1977. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis. London: The Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  38. ——— 1988. The Seminars of Jacques Lacan Book II: The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Techniques of Psychoanalysis 1954–1955. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Licklider, J. 1960. Man-Computer Symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics HFE-1: 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lister, M., J. Dovey, S. Giddings, I. Grant, and K. Kelly. 2003. New Media: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Manovich, L. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. McLuhan, M. 2001. Understanding Media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Moser, M. A. (ed.) with D. Macleod. 1996. Immersed in Technology: Art and Virtual Environments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Munster, A. 2006. Materializing New Media: Embodiment in Information Aesthetics. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  45. Murphie, A. 2002. Putting the Virtual Back into VR. In A Shock to Thought: Expression After Deleuze and Guattari, ed. B. Massumi. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Negroponte, N. 1996. Being Digital. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  47. Nusselder, A. 2012. Interface Fantasy: A Lacanian Cyborg Ontology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. Oxford English Dictionary—oed.com. 2015a. “Cyberspace.” Oxford University Press. Accessed 15 September 2015. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/240849. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/253795
  49. Oxford English Dictionary—oed.com. 2015b. “Cyborg.” Oxford University Press.Accessed 15 September 2015. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/46487. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/253795
  50. Sartre, J.P. 2004. The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Sholette, G. 2011. Dark Matter: Art and Politics in the Age of Enterprise Culture. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  52. Siapera, E. 2012. Understanding New Media. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Sutton, D., S. Brind, and R. McKenzie, eds. 2007. The State of the Real: Aesthetics in the Digital Age. London: I.B.Tauris.Google Scholar
  54. Tegmark, M. 2014. Our Mathematical Universe. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  55. Thurlow, C., and K. Mroczek. 2011. Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Turkle, S. 1997. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
  57. Wheeler, J.A. 1990. Information, Physics, Quantum: The Search for Links. In Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information, ed. W. Zurek. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  58. Žižek, S. 1991. Looking Awry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. ——— 1999. Is it Possible to Traverse the Fantasy in Cyberspace? In The Žižek Reader, eds. E. Wright, and E. Wright. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  60. ——— 2006. Interrogating the Real. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  61. ——— 2007. The Indivisible Remainder: On Schelling and Related Matters. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  62. ——— 2008a. The Plague of Fantasies. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  63. ——— 2008b. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  64. ——— 2009a. The Parallax View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  65. ——— 2009b. The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  66. ——— 2011. Living in the End Times. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  67. ——— 2012. Organs Without Bodies: On Deleuze and Consequences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. ——— 2013. Less than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  69. ——— 2014. Keynote: What does it Mean to be a Materialist Today? In International Žižek Studies Conference, University of Cincinnati, 4–6 June 2014.Google Scholar

Cultural Artefacts

  1. Ender’s Game. 2013. G. Hood (dir.).Google Scholar
  2. Second Life. 2003. Online, Linden Labs.Google Scholar
  3. The Matrix. 1999. The Wachowski Brothers (dirs.).Google Scholar
  4. The Thirteenth Floor. 1999. J. Rusnak (dir.).Google Scholar
  5. Tron. 1982. S. Lisberger (dir.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Garfield Benjamin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK

Personalised recommendations