Advertisement

Hans Morgenthau’s Pilgrimage Among the Engineers

  • Patrick Thaddeus Jackson
Chapter
Part of the The Palgrave Macmillan History of International Thought book series (PMHIT)

Abstract

Most accounts of Hans Morgenthau’s relationship to his adopted country operate under the sign of exile rather than that of pilgrimage. What such accounts often do not capture, however, is the substantive vision of international affairs that scholars like Morgenthau brought to their transactions with interlocutors in the United States, and how radically that vision differed from the one on offer in the bulk of US political science. Morgenthau was not simply trying to make space for himself in his adopted country; he was instead hoping to make a contribution to political thought generally, by articulating a way of worlding that differed significantly from the twin “progressive” pillars of a faith in the perfectability of human society through reason and a brash optimism that all problems were susceptible to technical solution that he found all too common in the United States. Morgenthau’s pilgrimage was thus not to a happy place of perfect contentment but to a place which had as its chief virtue the preservation of politics as an autonomous aspect of human social life.

References

  1. Frei, Christoph. 2001. Hans J. Morgenthau: An Intellectual Biography. Baton Rouge: LSU Press.Google Scholar
  2. Friedman, Michael. 2000. A Parting of the Ways: Carnap, Cassirer, and Heidegger. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  3. Guilhot, Nicolas. 2008. The Realist Gambit: Postwar American Political Science and the Birth of IR Theory. International Political Sociology 2 (4): 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———, ed. 2011. The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gunnell, John G. 1993. The Descent of Political Theory: The Genealogy of an American Vocation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus. 2014. Rationalizing Realpolitik: U.S. International Relations as a Liberal Field. In Professors and Their Politics, ed. Neil Gross and Solon Simmons, 267–290. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kirshner, Jonathan. 2015. Keynes’s Early Beliefs and Why They Still Matter. Challenge 58 (5): 398–412. doi: 10.1080/05775132.2015.1087243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lebow, R.N. 2003. The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levine, Daniel J. 2013. Why Hans Morgenthau Was Not a Critical Theorist (and Why Contemporary IR Realists Should Care). International Relations 27 (1): 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Long, David, and Brian C. Schmidt, eds. 2006. Imperialism and Internationalism in the Discipline of International Relations. Annotated edition. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  11. Luckhurst, Roger. 2005. Science Fiction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Macy, Jesse. 1917. The Scientific Spirit in Politics. The American Political Science Review 11 (1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Molloy, Sean. 2004. Truth, Power, Theory: Hans Morgenthau’s Formulation of Realism. Diplomacy & Statecraft 15 (1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moon, J. Donald. 1975. The Logic of Political Inquiry: A Synthesis of Opposed Perspectives. In Handbook of Political Science: Political Science, Scope and Theory, 131–228. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  15. Morgenthau, Hans J. 1946. Scientific Man vs Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2012. The Concept of the Political, ed. Hartmut Behr and Felix Rösch. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Paulson, Stanley L. 1992. The Neo-Kantian Dimension of Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 12 (3): 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Porter, Theodore M. 1994. The Death of the Object: Fin de Siecle Philosophy of Physics. In Modernist Impulses in the Human Sciences, 1870–1930, ed. Dorothy Ross, 128–151. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ross, Dorothy, ed. 1994. Modernist Social Science in the Land of the New/Old. In Modernist Impulses in the Human Sciences, 1870–1930, 171–89. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Scheuerman, William E. 2009. Morgenthau. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2012. Realism and the Kantian Tradition: A Revisionist Account. International Relations 26 (4): 453–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schmidt, Brian C. 1998. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  23. Schmitt, Carl. 2007. The Concept of the Political. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shaw, Albert. 1907. Presidential Address: Third Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. The American Political Science Review 1 (2): 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Turner, Stephen, and George Mazur. 2009. Morgenthau as a Weberian Methodologist. European Journal of International Relations 15 (3): 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vitalis, Robert. 2015. White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Weber, Max. 1999. Die ‘Objektivität’ Sozialwissenschaftlicher Und Sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. In Gesammelte Aufsätze Zur Wissenschaftslehre, ed. Elizabeth Flitner, 146–214. Potsdam: Internet-Ausgabe, http://www.uni-potsdam.de/u/paed/Flitner/Flitner/Weber/
  28. ———. 2004. The Vocation Lectures. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Press.Google Scholar
  29. Wilson, Woodrow. 1911. The Law and the Facts: Presidential Address, Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. The American Political Science Review 5 (1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Thaddeus Jackson
    • 1
  1. 1.School of International ServiceAmerican UniversityWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations