Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Governing China in the 21st Century ((GC21))

  • 216 Accesses

Abstract

The introductory chapter first defines the major question to be addressed by the book, that is, the so-called fundamental state-market dilemma, and then briefly describes existing solutions and their merits and weaknesses in overcoming the state-market dilemma. After that, the chapter presents the book’s major argument: dual intergovernmental transformation for market development (DITMD). Finally, the chapter discusses the comparability of the two cases of China and United States and describes the organization of the book as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    About this subject, see a recent comprehensive review by Pranab Bardhan (2016).

  2. 2.

    Most studies of decentralization do not express explicitly whether the state as a whole shall be strong or weak. But, the literature of decentralization implies implicitly that the state shall have strong authority over markets.

  3. 3.

    But, of course, the helping-hand state is different from socialism. One profound distinction between these two is that while the proponent of the helping hand of the state holds a philosophy of “the state plus markets,” socialism in principle does not acknowledge the fundamental virtue of markets.

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron, & James A. Robinson, Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty, New York: Crown Business, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, Philippe, & Alexandra Roulet, “Growth and the Smart State,” Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 6, 2014, pp. 913–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, Armen A., “Property Rights,” in David R. Henderson ed., The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, Liberty Fund, 2008, online available at http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/PropertyRights.html

  • Bardhan, Pranab, “The Nature of Institutional Impediments to Economic Development,” Center for International and Development Economics Research Working Paper No. C96-066, “Decentralization of Governance and Development,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2002, pp. 185–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, Pranab, “State and Development: The Need for a Reappraisal of the Current Literature,” Journal of Economic Literature, 2016, No. 54, Vol. 3, pp. 862–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Yoram, A Theory of the State: Economic Rights, Legal Rights, and the Scope of the State, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Yuanzheng, Yingyi Qian, & Barry R. Weingast, “From Federalism, Chinese Style, to Privatization, Chinese Style,” Economics of Transition, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1999, pp. 103–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheema, G. Shabbir, & Dennis A. Rondinelli eds., Decentralizing Governance: Emerging Concepts and Practices, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Minglu, & David S. G. Goodman, “The China Model: One Country, Six Authors,” Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 21, Issue 73, 2012, pp. 169–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Donald C., “Economic Development and the Rights Hypothesis: The China Problem,” American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2003, pp. 89–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H., “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, Vol. 4, No. 16, 1937, pp. 386–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H., “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 3, 1960, pp. 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H., & Ning Wang, How China Became Capitalist, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Howard, Thomas K. P. Leung, Sherriff T. K. Luk, & Yiu-Hing Wong, “The Benefits of ‘Guanxi’: The Value of Relationships in Developing the Chinese Market,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 24, Issue 3, 1995, pp. 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, E. Lance, & Douglass C. North, Institutional Change and American Economic Growth, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1971.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, Harold, “Toward a Theory of Property Rights,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, “Property Rights,” in Peter Newman ed., The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, Vol. 3, Hants: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002, pp. 144–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erk, Jan, “Comparative Federalism as a Growth Industry,” Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 37, Issue 2, 2007, pp. 262–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faguet, Jean-Paul, “Decentralization and Governance,” World Development, Vol. 53, 2014, pp. 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis, State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st century, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis, The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution, FSG, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis, Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy, FSG, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, Anver, Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, Alexander, John Jay, & James Madison, The Federalist: A Commentary on the Constitution of the United States, edited and with an introduction by Robert Scigliano, New York: Modern Library, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Hehui, Yingyi Qian, & Barry R. Weingast, “Regional Decentralization and Fiscal Incentives: Federalism, Chinese Style,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 89, 2005, pp. 1719–1742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, David, & Joseph E. Stiglitz eds., Law and Economics with Chinese Characteristics: Institutions for Promoting Development in the Twenty-First Century, University of Oxford Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Margaret, “The Predatory Theory of Rule,” Politics and Society, Vol. 10, 1981, pp. 431–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Justin Yifu, “New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development,” The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2011, pp. 193–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, Zedong, “On the Ten Major Relationships,” in Mao Zedong, Selected Works of Mao Zedong, 1999, Beijing: People’s Publishing House, pp. 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menard, Claude, & Mary M. Shirley eds., Handbook of New Institutional Economics, Boston, MA: Springer, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montinola, Gabriella, Yingyi Qian, & Barry R. Weingast, “Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China,” World Politics, Vol. 48, No. 1, 1995, pp. 50–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglas C., Structure and Change in Economic History, New York: Norton, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglas C., “Government and the Cost of Exchange in History,” Journal of Economic History, Vol. 44, No. 2, 1984, pp. 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglas C., Structure and Change in Economic History, New York: Norton, Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, Wallace E., Fiscal Federalism, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 37, No. 3, (Sep., 1999), pp. 1120–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oi, Jean C., & Andrew G. Walder eds., Property Rights and Economic Reform in China, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur, “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 87, No. 3, 1993, pp. 567–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Lynette H., “Fiscal Federalism and Soft Budget Constraints: The Case of China,” International Political Science Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2012, pp. 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Wei ed., China Model: A New Development Model from the Sixty Years of the People’s Republic (《中国模式:解读人民共和国的60年》), Beijing: Central Compilation & Translation Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Yingyi, & Barry R. Weingast, “China’s Transition to Markets: Market-Preserving Federalism, Chinese Style,” Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Vol. 1, Issue 2, 1996, pp. 149–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Yingyi, & Barry R. Weingast, “Federalism as a Commitment to Preserving Market Incentives,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 11, No. 4, 1997, pp. 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, Jonathan, “Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement,” Comparative Politics, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2004, pp. 481–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, Jonathan, Hamilton’s Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Decentralization, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, Jonathan, & Susan Rose-Ackerman, “Does Federalism Preserve Markets?” Virginia Law Review, Vol. 83, No. 7, Symposium: The Allocation of Government Authority, 1997, pp. 1521–1572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, Dennis A., “Government Decentralization in Comparative Perspective: Theory and Practice in Developing Countries,” International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 47, No. 1, 1981, pp. 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, Andrei, & Robert W. Vishny, “Corruption,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 108, No. 3, The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E., The Economic Role of the State, Cambridge, MA: B. Blackwell, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E., “The Role of Government in Economic Development,” Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E., “More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving Toward the Post-Washington Consensus,” The 1998 WIDER Annual Lecture, Helsinki, Finland, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E., & Shahid Yusuf eds., Rethinking the East Asia Miracle, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trebilock, Michael, & Jing Leng, “The Role of Formal Contract Law and Enforcement in Economic Development,” Virginia Law Review, Vol. 92, 2006, pp. 1517–1580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, Daniel, The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wan, Ming, The China Model and Global Political Economy: Comparison, Impact, and Interaction, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, Barry R., “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development,” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, Vol. 11, No. 1, 1995, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, Barry R., “Second Generation Fiscal Federalism: The Implications of Fiscal Incentives,” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 65, Issue 3, 2009, pp. 279–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wibbels, Erik, Federalism and the Market: Intergovernmental Conflict and Economic Reform in the Developing World, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, John, “What Washington Means by Policy Reform,” in John Williamson ed., Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened, Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E., “Economies as an Antitrust Defense: The Welfare Tradeoffs,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 58, No. 1, “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations,” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1979, pp. 233–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, New York: Free Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E., The Mechanisms of Governance, New York: Oxford University, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank, World Development Report 1997: The State in A Changing World, New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank, World Development Report, World Development Report 2002: Building Institutions for Markets, New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank Independent Evaluation Group, Decentralization in Client Countries: An Evaluation of World Bank Support, 1990–2007, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunsch, James S., “Decentralization: Theoretical, Conceptual, and Analytical Issues,” in J. Tyler Dickovick & James S. Wunsch ed., Decentralization in Africa: The Paradox of State Strength, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2014, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Qizheng, John Naisbitt, & Doris Naisbitt, Dialogue the China Model (《对话中国模式》), Beijing: New World Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cheng, J. (2019). Introduction. In: States, Intergovernmental Relations, and Market Development. Governing China in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58357-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics