Skip to main content

Symbolic Leadership in a Transnational Context: An Investigation on Leaders’ Adjustment and Acceptance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Leadership in Transforming Asia
  • 1622 Accesses

Abstract

Every leader’s symbolic action creates meaning. However, it is especially the symbols which leaders in a cross-cultural context use that are always reconstructed based on experience, culture, and generally accepted and practised values from a different cultural background. Accordingly, this chapter analyses the adjustment process of expatriate managers abroad; special emphasis is put on the degree to which the willingness to adjust the symbolic actions to the local cultural environment is rewarded with a higher acceptance as leader. Results show that, especially, the adjustment of language and behaviour results in a higher acceptance rate. Thus, it is argued in this chapter that leaders should carefully regard how their symbolic interactions are interpreted or comprehended by the host country workforce since the acceptance as a leader is one important aspect in order to achieve success in an international assignment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andres, T. D. (1985). Management by Filipino values. Quezon City: New Day Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, S., van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural Intelligence: Its Measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armenakis, A., Fredenberger, W., Giles, W., Cherones, L., Feild, H., & Holley, W. (1996). Symbolism use by business turnaround change agents. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 4(2), 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartoelke, K. (1987). Leadership: Nothing but constructing reality by negotiations? In J. G. Hunt, B. R. Baliga, P. Dachler, & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.), Emerging leadership vistas (pp. 151–157). Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J., Mendenhall, M., & Oddou, G. (1991). Towards a comprehensive model of international adjustment: An integration of multiple theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 291–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kim, K., Farh, C. I. C., & Tangirala, S. (2010). When does cross-cultural motivation enhance expatriate effectiveness? A multilevel investigation of the moderating roles of subsidiary support and cultural distance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1110–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dandridge, T., Mitroff, I., & Joyce, W. (1980). Organizational symbolism: A topic to expand organizational analysis. Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leon, C. T. (1987). Social categorisation in Philippine organisations: Values toward collective identity and management through intergroup relations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 5(1), 28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierendonck, D. van. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairholm, M. R., & Fairholm, G. W. (2009). Understanding leadership perspectives: Theoretical and practical approaches. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Festing, M., & Maletzky, M. (2010). Cross-cultural leadership adjustment: A multilevel framework based on the theory of structuration. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 186–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, G. M. (1968). The Philippine temperament: Six perspectives on the Philippines. In G. M. Guthrie (Ed.), Philippines (pp. 49–83). Quezon City: Bookmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslberger, A. (2005). The complexities of expatriate adaptation. Human Resource Management Review, 15(2), 160–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D. D. (1990). Collective sanctions and compliance norms: A formal theory of group mediated social control. American Sociological Review, 55(3), 366–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2005). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnsteiner, M. R. (1970). Reciprocity in the lowland Philippines. In F. Lynch (Ed.), Four readings on Philippine values (pp. 65–108). Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. E., & Sugiyama, S. (2005). Mobile phones as fashion statements: The co-creation of mobile communication’s public. Meaning, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 31(1), 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, B. E., & Bredeson, P. V. (1991). Measures of meaning in a Public and in a parochial school: Principals as symbol manager. Journal of Educational Administration, 29(3), 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., Huang, J. L., Piszczek, M. M., Fleenor, J. W., & Ruderman, M. (2015). Rating expatriate leader effectiveness in multisource feedback systems: Cultural distance and hierarchical effects. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraimer, M. L., Wayne, S. J., & Jaworski, R. (2001). Sources of support and expatriate performance: The mediating role of expatriate adjustment. Personnel Psychology, 54(1), 71–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littrell, R. F., Alon, I., & Chan, K. W. (2012). Regional differences in managerial leader behaviour preferences in China. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Boston, Mass: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G., Frost, P. J., & Pondy, L. R. (1983). Organizational symbolism. In L. R. Pondy, P. J. Frost, G. Morgan, & T. C. Dandridge (Eds.), Organizational symbolism (pp. 3–38). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, O. (1995). Führen und Geführt werden. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, C., & Linder, C. (2016). Do you know how much your expatriate costs?: An activity-based cost analysis of expatriation. Journal of Global Mobility, 4(1), 88–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oguri, M., & Gudykunst, W. B. (2002). The influence of self construals and communication styles on sojourners’ psychological and sociocultural adjustment. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26(5), 577–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pondy, L. R. (1978). Organizational symbolism. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale, C. (2007). Quality in qualitative research. In C. Seale, G. Giampetro, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 379–389). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selmer, J. (2007). Which is easier, adjusting to a similar or to a dissimilar culture? American business expatriates in Canada and Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 7(2), 185–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaheena, J. J. (2003). The sustainability of social capital within ethnic. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shay, J., & Bruce, T. (1997). Expatriate managers. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Quarterly, 38(1), 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenkar, O. (2012). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayeb, M. (1995). The competitive advantage of nations: The role of HRM and its socio-cultural context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 6(3), 588–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, I. (2010). Contemporary leadership theories: Enhancing the understanding of the complexity, subjectivity and dynamic of leadership. Contributions to management science. Heidelberg, New York: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, A., & Sparrow, P. (2007). Mutual adjustment processes in international teams. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37(3), 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Linder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Measures

I used the following indicators for the constructs. Factor loadings range between 0.584 and 0.940 and were significant at least at a p < 0.05 level.

Verbal symbolic leadership: Cronbach’s α (α) = 0.928, composite reliability (CR) = 0.949, average variance extracted (AVE) = 0.823.

(i) Adjustment of speech, (ii) mindfulness with wording, (iii) try to apply the foreign phrase, and (iv) choose metaphors I hear from my staff.

Enacted symbolic leadership: α = 0.940, CR = 0.958, AVE = 0.850

(i) Underplay dominance, (ii) back words with actions, (iii) reaction of their behaviour, and (iv) discuss their behaviour.

Material symbolic leadership: α = 0.801 0.839 0.662

(i) Technical device, (ii) status symbols, (iii) cloth, and (iv) artefacts.

Acceptance as leader: α = 0.949 CR = 0.964 AVE = 0.870

(i) Respect form respect Host Country National (HCN) workforce, (ii) recognition as leader, (iii) acceptance as leader, and (vi) HCN workforce response

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Linder, C. (2017). Symbolic Leadership in a Transnational Context: An Investigation on Leaders’ Adjustment and Acceptance. In: Muenjohn, N., McMurray, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Leadership in Transforming Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57940-9_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics