Advertisement

Start-up Success and the Five Types of Place Surplus

  • Sami Mahroum
Chapter

Abstract

Mid-way through the twentieth century, the 30 by 10-mile stretch of land between San Francisco and San Jose in Northern California was known for its rich agricultural soil and bountiful production of apricots and walnuts. Today, however, we know this place as Silicon Valley—the most recognised location for high-tech start-up activity in the world. The remarkable transformation from agricultural region into a world leading hub of technology, talent and prosperity is well documented (Adams 2005; Chong et al. 2000; Cohen and Fields 1999; Florida and Kenney 1990; Kenney 2000; Nicholas and Lee 2013; Perry-Piscione 2013; Reinhardt et al. 1997a, b; Saxenian 1991, 1994).

Keywords

Comparative Advantage Digital Equipment Corporation Science Park Risk Capital Black Swan 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adams, S.B. 2005. Stanford and Silicon Valley: Lessons on becoming a high-tech region. California Management Review 48(1): 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armour, J. and D. Cumming. 2003. The legal road to replicating Silicon Valley. Retrieved from AltAssets, http://www.altassets.net/pdfs/replicating_silicon_valley.pdf
  3. Aula, P., and V. Harmaakorpi. 2008. An innovative milieu—a view on regional reputation building: Case study of the Lahti Urban. Region Regional Studies 42(4): 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bianchi, G. 1998. Requiem for the third Italy? Rise and fall of a too successful concept. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 10: 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolton, R. 2002. Place surplus, exit, voice, and loyalty. In Regional policies and comparative advantage, ed. B. Johansson, C. Karlsson, and R. Stough. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Bramwell, A., and D. Wolfe. 2008. Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy 37: 1175–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brenner, T., and A. Muhlig. 2013. Factors and mechanisms causing the emergence of local industrial clusters: A summary of 159 cases. Regional Studies 47(4): 480–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bresnahan, T., and A. Gambardella (eds.). 2004. Building high-tech clusters: Silicon Valley and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, J. R. 2012. Building an IT economy: South Korean science and technology policy. Brookings’ Issues in Technology Innovation, no. 19, Sept 2012.Google Scholar
  10. Cambridge Science Park. 2015. About the park. http://www.cambridgesciencepark.co.uk/about/history/
  11. Capello, R. 1999. SME clustering and factor productivity: A milieu production function model. European Planning Studies 7(6): 719–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chong, M.L., W.F. Miller, M.G. Hancock, and H.S. Rowen (eds.). 2000. The Silicon Valley edge: A habitat for innovation and entrepreneurship. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, S.S., and G. Fields. 1999. Social capital and capital gains in Silicon Valley. California Management Review 41(2): 108–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook, P., and K. Morgan. 1994. The creative milieu: A regional perspective on innovation. In The handbook of industrial innovation, ed. R. Rothwell and M. Dodgson. Northampton: Edwards Elgar.Google Scholar
  15. Daedeok Innopolis. 2013. Hub for global technology commercialisation. https://www.innopolis.or.kr/attach/brochure/c8b9603c60bafeb583f9978a12d65ce8.pdf
  16. Delgado, M., M. Porter, and S. Stern. 2011. Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Retrieved from http://www.isc.hbs.edu/pdf/DPS_Clusters_Performance_2011-0311.pdf
  17. Diamond, Jared. 1997. Guns, germs and steel. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  18. EIU. 2011. Fostering innovation-led clusters: A review of leading global practices. Retrieved from http://www.managementthinking.eiu.com/sites/default/files/downloads/EIU-ATIC_Report2_Web_Revised.pdf
  19. Engel, J., and I. del-Palacio. 2009a. Global networks of clusters of innovation: The case of Israel and Silicon Valley. Business Horizons 52(5): 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Engel, J., and I. del-Palacio. 2009b. Global networks of clusters of innovation: Accelerating the innovation process. Business Horizons 765: 493. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ferrary, M. 2003. The gift exchange in the social networks of Silicon Valley. California Management Review 45(4): 120–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Florida, R., and M. Kenney. 1990. Silicon Valley and route 128 won’t save u s. California Management Review 33(1): 68–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Florida, R. 2008. Megaregions: The importance of place. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/2008/03/megaregions-the-importance-of-place/ar/1
  24. Greenwald, T. 2013. Beijing’s great leap forward. In Business report: The next Silicon Valley, ed. MIT Technology Review, 4–5. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  25. Hodgson, R. 2015. High-tech technology entrepreneurship in a university town. In The entrepreneurial university, ed. L. Foss and D. Gibson. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Kalman, M. 2013. Israel’s military-entrepreneurship complex owns big data. In Business report: The next Silicon Valley, ed. MIT Technology Review, 7. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  27. Keeble, D., C. Lawson, H. Lawton Smith, B. Moore, and F. Wilkinson. 1998. Collective learning processes and internal networking in innovative high-technology regions. Working paper 86, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  28. Kenney, M. (ed.). 2000. Understanding Silicon Valley: The anatomy of an entrepreneurial region. Stanford: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
  29. Koh, F.C.C., W.T.H. Koh, and F.T. Tschang. 2005. An analytical framework for Science Parks and technology districts with an application to Singapore. Journal of Business Venturing 20: 217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kronenberg, K. 2013. Firm relocations in the Netherlands: Why do firms move, and where do they go? Regional Science 92: 691–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lawton Smith, H., and J. Glasson. 2010. Milton park: Developing a successful high-tech business park. In Local knowledge: Case studies of four innovative places. London: NESTA.Google Scholar
  32. Lawton Smith, H., et al. 2013. Entrepreneurial regions: Evidence from Oxfordshire and Cambridgeshire. Social Science Information 52(4): 653–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, C., W.F. Miller, M.G. Hancock, and H.S. Rowen (eds.). 2000. The Silicon Valley edge: A habitat for innovation and entrepreneurship. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lawton Smith, H., J. Glasson, and A. Chadwick. 2007. Enterprising Oxford: The Oxfordshire model. Oxford: Oxfordshire Economic Observatory.Google Scholar
  35. Leslie, S.W., and R.H. Kargon. 1996. Selling Silicon Valley: Federick Terman’s model for regional advantage. Business History Review 70: 435–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Longhi, C. 1999. Networks, collaborative learning and technology development in innovative high-tech regions. Regional Studies 4: 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Malerba, F., and R.R. Nelson. 2011. Learning and catching up in different sectoral systems: Evidence from six industries. Industrial and Corporate Change 20(6): 1645–1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Massey, D., P. Quintas, and D. Wield. 2003. High-tech fantasies: Science parks in society, science and space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Mathews, J.A. 1997. A Silicon Valley of the east: Creating Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. California Management Review 30(4): 26–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mayer, H., and J. Cortright. 2001. High tech specialisation: A comparison of high technology centers. Survey series. Washington: The Brookings Institution. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/reports/2001/1/01%20high%20tech%20regions%20cortright/specialization.pdf
  41. Mayer, H. 2009. Bootstrapping high-tech: Evidence from three emerging high technology metropolitan areas, Metro Economies Series for the Metropolitan Policy Program. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institutions. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports/2009/06/metro-hightech-mayer.Google Scholar
  42. Mercan, B., and D. Goktas. 2011. Components of innovation ecosystems: A cross-country study. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 76: 102–112.Google Scholar
  43. Menzel, M., and D. Fornahl. 2007, October 30. Cluster life cycles: Dimensions and rationales of cluster development. JENA Economic Research Papers, 76. Jena: Friedrich-Schiller University & Max Planck Institute of Economics. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1025970
  44. Micklethwait, J. 1997, March 27. The valley of money’s delight: Special report: Silicon Valley. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/366753
  45. Moye, J. 2013. Why Austin Sits atop the next wave of U.S. start-up locations. Retrieved from http://www.coca-colacompany.com/stories/why-austin-sits-atop-the-next-wave-of-us-start-up-locations
  46. Nicholas, T., and J. Lee. 2013, January 30. The origins and development of Silicon Valley. Case 813-098. Cambridge: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  47. Oh, D.-S. 2014. Business incubation strategy of high-tech venture firms. In Technopolis: Best practices for science and technology cities, ed. D.-S. Oh and F. Phillips. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oh, D.-S., and I. Yeom. 2012. Daedeok Innopolis in Korea: From science park to innovation cluster. Best Practice of Science/Technology Park 1: 141–154.Google Scholar
  49. Park, C.-B. 2012. Issues and impacts of Daedeok Innopolis on regional development policy in Korea. http://www.hkip.org.hk/ci/powerpoint/Prof.%20Park.pdf
  50. Pe’er, A., and T. Keil. 2013. Are all start-ups affected similarly by clusters? Agglomeration, competition, firm heterogeneity, and survival. Journal of Business Venturing 28: 354–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Perry-Piscione, D. 2013. Secrets of Silicon Valley: What everyone else can learn from the innovation capital of the world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. Piergiovanni, R. 2010. Gibrat’s Law in the “Third Italy”: Firm growth in the Veneto region. Growth and Change 41(1): 28–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Porter, M.E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Porter, M.E. 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review 76(6): 77–90.Google Scholar
  55. Porter, M.E. 2000. Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly 14(1): 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Reinhardt, A., J. O’C. Hamilton, and L. Himelstein. 1997a, August. Silicon Valley special report: How it really works: What transformed a patch of prune orchards into the Epicenter of Global Technology? Business Week. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/1997/34/b35414.htm
  57. Reinhardt, A., J. O’C. Hamilton, and L. Himelstein. 1997b, August. Silicon Valley special report: What matters is how smart you are. Business Week. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/1997/34/b35414.htm
  58. Rosegrant, S., and D. Lampe. 1993. Route 128: Lessons from Boston’s high-tech community. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  59. Saxenian, A. 1991. Silicon Valley and route 128 won’t save us: Response to Richard Florida and Martin Kenney. California Management Review 33(3): 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Saxenian, A. 1994. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and route 128. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Saxenian, A. 2000. Networks of immigrant entrepreneurs. In The Silicon Valley edge: A habitat for innovation and entrepreneurship, ed. C. Lee, W.F. Miller, M.G. Hancock, and H.S. Rowen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Simmie, J. (ed.). 2003. Regional and policy development 18: Innovation networks and learning regions? London: Regional Studies Association.Google Scholar
  63. Sorenson, O. 2003. Social networks and industrial geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 13: 513–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stangler, D. 2013, September. Path-dependent start-up locations: Comparing metropolitan performance: High-tech and ICT start-up density. Kansas City: Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.kauffman.org/uploadedFiles/DownLoadableResources/path-dependent-start-up-locations-comparing-metropolitan-performance-high-tech-and-ict-start-up-density.pdf
  65. Subramanian, L. S. 2014, January 9. Is Bangalore the technology start-up capital of the world? Information Week. Retrieved from http://www.informationweek.in/informationweek/news-analysis/287037/bangalore-technology-start-capital-world
  66. Tannert, C. 2013. Great tech start-up cities: Tel Aviv. Retrieved from http://www.coca-colacompany.com/stories/great-tech-start-up-cities-tel-aviv
  67. Tiits, M., and T. Kalvet. 2012, February. Working paper: Nordic small countries in the global hi-tech value chains: The case of telecommunication systems production in Estonia. Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics, 38. Retrieved from https://www.etis.ee/portaal/tTpublikatsioonidVaata.aspx?VID=387247&TextBoxName=kalvet&PersonVID=37557&lang=en&FromUrl0=isikud.aspx&FromUrl1=isikuPublikatsioonid.aspx
  68. The Guardian. 2012, June 12. Which is the World’s Most Expensive City? Cost of Living Survey 2012. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/jun/12/city-cost-of-living-2012-tokyo
  69. Wadha, V., A. Saxenian, B. Rissing, and G. Gereffi. 2007, January 4. America’s new immigrant entrepreneurs: Part 1. Duke Science, Technology and Innovation Paper No. 23. Durham, NC: Duke University and Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  70. Wadhwa, V. 2013. Silicon Valley can’t be copied. In MIT technology review, business report: The next Silicon Valley (pp. 3–4). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  71. Walcott, S.M. 2007. Wenshou and the Third Italy: Entrepreneurial model regions. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business 8(3): 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Westlund, Hans, and Roger Bolton. 2003. Local social capital and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 21(2): 77–113.Google Scholar
  73. Westlund, Hans. 2006. Social capital in the knowledge economy: Theory and empirics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  74. Wolfe, Tom. 1983. The tinkerings of Robert Noyce: How the sun rose on the Silicon Valley. Esquire Magazine (pp. 346–374). http://www.brightboys.org/PDF/Wolfe_Noyce.pdf

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)> 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sami Mahroum
    • 1
  1. 1.INSEAD Abu Dhabi CampusAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations