Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conclusion: Contested Meanings of Parenthood: ‘As Real as It Gets’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Parenthood and Open Adoption

  • 399 Accesses

Abstract

Drawing together the conclusions of this study of adoptive parenthood and open adoption, MacDonald discusses how the meaning and status of adoptive parenthood is contested across various social domains. Culturally, a contest over the relative strength and validity of social versus biological parenthood is notable in adopters’ encounters with microaggressions. Structurally, public adoption from care, especially compulsory adoption, is a contested field of child welfare practice and results in adopters feeling constrained to facilitate birth family contact. On an interpersonal level, adoptions from care are often contested by birth parents, with implications for relationships in the adoptive kinship network. MacDonald identifies contact between adopters and birth relatives as an opportunity for display and recognition of one another’s legitimate kin connection to the child. MacDonald concludes with suggestions for research and empowering practice in open adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bridge, C., and H. Swindells. 2003. Adoption: The Modern Law. Bristol: Jordan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodzinsky, D.M. 2005. Reconceptualizing openness in adoption: Implications for theory, research and practice. In Psychological Issues in Adoption: Research and Practice, ed. D.M. Brodzinsky and J. Palacios, 145–166. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., and Ward, H. 2013. Decision-making within a child’s timeframe. Working Paper 16. Childhood Wellbeing Research Centre, Loughborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bywaters, P. 2015. Cumulative jeopardy? A response to Brown and Ward. Children and Youth Services Review 52: 68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsten, J. 2000. Knowing where you’ve come from: Ruptures and continuities of time and kinship in narratives of adoption reunions. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6(4): 687–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carsten, J. 2004. After Kinship: New Departures in Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health Social Services and Public Safety. 2003. A Better Future: 50 years of Child Care in Northern Ireland 1950–2000. Belfast: DHSSPS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, N., M.H. Van Dulmen, S. Ayers‐Lopez, J.M. Berge, C. Christian, G. Gossman, S.M. Henney, T.J. Mendenhall, H.D. Grotevant, and R. McRoy. 2006. Processes linked to contact changes in adoptive kinship networks. Family Process 45(4): 449–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. 2007. Displaying families. Sociology 41(1): 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finley, G.E. 2004. Adoption. Adoption Quarterly 17(1): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fratter, J. 1996. Adoption with Contact: Implications for Policy and Practice. London: BAAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, K.J., and Grotevant, H.D. 2015. “You were adopted?!” Microaggressions toward adolescent adopted individuals in same-race families. The Counseling Psychologist 43(3): 435–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotevant, H.D. 2000. Openness in adoption: Research with the adoption kinship network. Adoption Quarterly 4(1): 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotevant, H.D. 2009. Emotional distance regulation over the life-course. In International Advances in Adoption Research for Practice, ed. G.M. Wrobel and E. Neil, 269–294. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Hanks, J.A., Bachrach, C.A., Morgan, S.P., and Kohler, H.P. 2011. Understanding Family Change and Variation: Toward a Theory of Conjunctural Action. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., and S. Hackett. 2012. Redefining family relationships following adoption: Adoptive parents’ perspectives on the changing nature of kinship between adoptees and birth relatives. British Journal of Social Work 42(2): 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., and J. Logan. 2013. Editorial to rediscovering family and kinship: New directions for social work theory, policy and practice. Child and Family Social Work 18(1): 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, S.L., A.I. Karel, and K. Chatterjee. 2006. Covering adoption: General depictions in broadcast news. Family Relations 55: 487–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon, I.G. 2002. Adoption losses: Naturally occurring or socially constructed? Child Development 73(2): 652–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. 2013. Contemporary adoptive kinship: A contribution to new kinship studies. Child and Family Social Work 18(1): 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J., and C. Smith. 2005. Face-to-face contact post adoption: Views from the triangles. British Journal of Social Work 35(1): 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckock, B., and A. Hart. 2005. Adoptive family life and adoption support: Policy ambivalence and the development of effective services. Child & Family Social Work 10(2): 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. 2015. A picture of who we are as a family: Conceptualizing post-adoption contact as practices of family display. Child and Family Social Work. doi:10.1111/cfs.12248.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M., and D. McSherry. 2011. Open adoption: Adoptive parents’ experiences of birth family contact and talking to their child about adoption. Adoption & Fostering 35(3): 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. 2011. What it means to be related. In Sociology of Personal Life, ed. V. May, 59–71. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., and B. Tipper. 2008. Children and the making of kinship configurations. In Beyond the Nuclear Family: Families in a Configurational Perspective, ed. E.D. Widmer and R. Jallinoja, 137–156. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSherry, D., E. Larkin, M. Fargas, G. Kelly, C. Robinson, G. Macdonald, D. Schubotz, and R. Kilpatrick. 2008. From Care to Where. A Care Pathways and Outcomes Report for Practitioners. Belfast: Institute of Child Care Research, Queens University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, C.E., and K. March. 2006. Open adoption as a family form community assessments and social support. Journal of Family Issues 26(3): 380–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D.H. 1996. Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D.H. 2011. Rethinking Family Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neil, E. 2002. Contact after adoption: The role of agencies in making and supporting plans. Adoption & Fostering 26(1): 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neil, E. 2009. The corresponding experiences of adoptive parents and birth relatives in open adoptions. In International Advances in Adoption Research for Practice, ed. G.M. Wrobel and E. Neil, 269–294. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neil, E., J. Cossar, C. Jones, P. Lorgelly and J. Young. 2011. Supporting Direct Contact After Adoption. London: BAAF (British Association for Adoption and Fostering).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, A., E. Monck, H. Upright, and M. Davidson. 2006. Enhancing adoptive parenting: Devising promising interventions. Child and Adolescent Mental Health 11(1): 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sales, S. 2012. Adoption, Family and the Paradox of Origins: A Foucauldian History. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D.H. 1993. Open adoption of infants: Adoptive parents’ perceptions of advantages and disadvantages. Social Work 38(1): 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D.H. 2003. Open adoption of infants: Adoptive parents’ feelings seven years later. Social Work 48(3): 409–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D.H. 2008. Open adoption and adolescence. Families in Society: The journal of Contemporary Social Services 89(3): 366–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D.H., and S.L. Smith. 2012. Openness in Adoption: From Secrecy and Stigma to Knowledge and Connections. New York: Evan B. Donaldson Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, J. 2008. Developing a curiosity about adoption: A psychoanalytic perspective. In The Emotional Experience of Adoption: A Psychoanalytic Perspective, ed. D. Hindle and G. Shulman, 27–41. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. 2007. Personal Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., and J. Logan. 2002. Adoptive parenthood as a ‘legal fiction’—It’s consequences for direct post-adoption contact. Child and Family Law Quarterly 281(3): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., and J. Logan. 2004. After Adoption: Direct Contact and Relationships. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., J.L. Surrey, and M. Watkins. 2006. “Real” mothers: Adoptive mothers resisting marginalisation and recreating motherhood. In Adoptive Families in a Diverse Society, ed. K. Wegar, 146–161. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tefre, Ø.S. 2015. The justifications for terminating parental rights and adoption in the United States. Children and Youth Services Review 48: 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrell, J., and J. Modell. 1994. Anthropology and adoption. American Anthropologist 96(1): 155–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Sciences, Education and Social Work,, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK

    Mandi MacDonald

Authors
  1. Mandi MacDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MacDonald, M. (2016). Conclusion: Contested Meanings of Parenthood: ‘As Real as It Gets’. In: Parenthood and Open Adoption. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57645-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57645-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57644-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57645-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation