Skip to main content

Configuring Adoptive Kinship: ‘Close, But Not Too Close’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Parenthood and Open Adoption
  • 420 Accesses

Abstract

In a detailed examination of how relationships in the adoptive kinship network are actualised, MacDonald conceptualises the practices of contact in open adoption as family practices (Morgan, Family connections: An introduction to family studies. Polity Press: Cambridge, 1996; Rethinking Family Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011). Analysing adoptive parents’ accounts, MacDonald illuminates the tacit rules that determined the position given to birth relatives, and describes the practices by which these configurations (Widmer and Jallinoja, Beyond the nuclear family: Families in configurational perspective. Bern: Peter Lang, 2008) are sustained, revealing the nuanced ways that different birth relatives can be variously positioned as kin through practices that simultaneously include and exclude. The most family-like relationships might be possible with birth relatives who support the adoption, demonstrate commitment to the child’s welfare, and do not make excessive demands on the adoptive family. MacDonald identifies the need for more accurate vocabulary to describe kinship roles and relationships in open adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Dunbar, N., M.H. Van Dulmen, S. Ayers‐Lopez, J.M. Berge, C. Christian, G. Gossman, S.M. Henney, T.J. Mendenhall, H.D. Grotevant, and R. McRoy. 2006. Processes linked to contact changes in adoptive kinship networks. Family Process 45(4): 449–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J., and M. Strathern. 2000. Including our own. In Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, ed. J. Carsten, 149–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. 2007. Displaying families. Sociology 41(1): 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fravel, D.L., R.G. McRoy, and H.D. Grotevant. 2000. Birthmother perceptions of the psychologically present adopted child: Adoption openness and boundary ambiguity. Family Relations 49(4): 425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomila, A. 2011. Family photographs: Putting families on display. In Families and Kinship in Contemporary Europe, ed. R. Jallinoja and E.D. Widmer, 63–77. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grand, M.P. 2010. The Adoption Constellation: New Ways of Thinking About and Practicing Adoption. Ontario: University of Guelph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotevant, H.D. 2000. Openness in adoption: Research with the adoption kinship network. Adoption Quarterly 4(1): 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grotevant, H.D. 2009. Emotional distance regulation over the life-course. In International Advances in Adoption Research for Practice, ed. G.M. Wrobel and E. Neil, 269–294. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, A., and B. Luckock. 2004. Developing Adoption Support and Therapy: New Approaches for Practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogbacka, R. 2011. Exclusivity and inclusivity in transnational adoption. In Families and Kinship in Contemporary Europe, ed. R. Jallinoja and E.D. Widmer, 129–146. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jallinoja, R. 2008. Togetherness and being together: Family configurations in the making. In Widmer, E.D. and Jallinoja, R., eds. Beyond the Nuclear Family: Families in Configurational Perspective, 97–118. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jallinoja, R., and E.D. Widmer (eds.). 2011. Families and Kinship in Contemporary Europe. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., and S. Hackett. 2012. Redefining family relationships following adoption: Adoptive parents’ perspectives on the changing nature of kinship between adoptees and birth relatives. British Journal of Social Work 42(2): 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., and J. Logan. 2013. Editorial to rediscovering family and kinship: New directions for social work theory, policy and practice. Child and Family Social Work 18(1): 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. 2013. Contemporary adoptive kinship: A contribution to new kinship studies. Child and Family Social Work 18(1): 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J., and C. Smith. 2005. Face-to-face contact post adoption: Views from the triangles. British Journal of Social Work 35(1): 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M. 2015. A picture of who we are as a family: Conceptualizing post-adoption contact as practices of family display. Child and Family Social Work. doi:10.1111/cfs.12248.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, M., and D. McSherry. 2013. Constrained adoptive parenthood and family transition: Adopters’ experience of unplanned birth family contact in adolescence. Child & Family Social Work 18(1): 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., and B. Tipper. 2008. Children and the making of kinship configurations. In Beyond the Nuclear Family: Families in a Configurational Perspective, ed. E.D. Widmer and R. Jallinoja, 137–156. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D.H. 1996. Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D.H. 2011. Rethinking Family Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neil, E., and D. Howe. 2004. Conclusions: A transactional model for thinking about contact. In Contact in Adoption and Permanent Foster Care: Research, Theory and Practice, eds. E. Neil and D. Howe. London: BAAF (British Association for Adoption and Fostering).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios, J. 2009. The ecology of adoption. In International Advances in Adoption Research for Practice, ed. G.M. Wrobel and E. Neil, 71–94. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales, S. 2012. Adoption, Family and the Paradox of Origins: A Foucauldian History. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, E.B., and C. Smart. 1999. The ‘new’ practices and politics of family life. In The New Family? ed. E.B. Silva and C. Smart, 1–12. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrell, J., and J. Modell. 1994. Anthropology and adoption. American Anthropologist 96(1): 155–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triseliotis, J., J. Feast, and F. Kyle. 2005. The Adoption Triangle Revisited. London: BAAF (British Association for Adoption and Fostering).

    Google Scholar 

  • Widmer, E.D., and R. Jallinoja. 2008. Beyond the Nuclear Family: Families in Configurational Perspective. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrobel, G.M., H.D. Grotevant, J. Berge, T. Mendenhall, and R. McRoy. 2003. Contact in adoption: The experience of adoptive families in the USA. Adoption & Fostering 27(1): 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MacDonald, M. (2016). Configuring Adoptive Kinship: ‘Close, But Not Too Close’. In: Parenthood and Open Adoption. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57645-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57645-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57644-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57645-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics