Advertisement

Greek-Turkish Relations During the Greek Crisis: The Impact of the Crisis on Partnership Efforts

Chapter

Abstract

The deep and long-standing economic recession in Greece paved the way for a severe crisis with unexpected socio-political and international consequences for the Greek people. Greek foreign policy towards Turkey, an important actor in the Eastern Mediterranean and neighbor, is not exempted from this general tendency that rules the Greek state’s affairs. The economic impasse that Athens has experienced in its domestic affairs since 2009 affects Greece’s status in the international system. It is a commonplace to say that the economic strength or weakness of a state affects its efficiency in the conduct of domestic and international politics alike. The role that the economy plays as a link between the two spheres is of considerable importance, since economic affairs hold a central place among the factors that determine a state’s overall power.

Keywords

Foreign Policy National Sovereignty Bilateral Relation Turkish State Greek Government 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Abatzis, A. ‘Promising the letter of Papandreou’, Eleytherotipia, January 27th 2010. (In Greek) [http://www.enet.gr/?i=issue.el.home&date=27/01/2010&id=125482. Retrieved in January 20th, 2016].
  2. Adam, K. ‘Erdogan calls Giorgo for dialog, information [obtained] via Ankara ’, Eleytherotipia, November 5th 2009. (In Greek) [http://www.enet.gr/?i=news.el.article&id=98673. Retrieved in December 15th, 2015].
  3. Adam, K. ‘We discuss everything concerning the Aegean and in case of failure, [then we apply to the International Court of] Hage’, Eleytherotipia, January 26th 2010. (In Greek) [http://www.enet.gr/?i=news.el.article&id=125078. Retrieved in January 20th, 2016].
  4. Akgönül, S. 2004. Les Grecs de Turquie. Processus d’extinction d’une minorité de l’âge de l’État-nation à l’âge de la mondialisation (1923–2001). Louvain-la-Neuve: Bruylant-Academia.Google Scholar
  5. Akşam, ‘The Premier and 10 ministers will visit Athens in May’, April 9th, 2010a. (In Turkish) [http://www.aksam.com.tr/medyator/2010/04/10/haber/siyaset/5766/basbakan_ve_10_bakan_mayista_atina_yolcusu.html. Retrieved in December 15th, 2015a].
  6. Akşam, ‘New Era [in relations with] Athens’, May 15th, 2010b. (In Turkish) [http://www.aksam.com.tr/medyator/2010/05/15/haber/dunya/5166/atina_ile_yeni_cag.html. Retrieved in December 16th, 2015b].
  7. Alexandris, A. The Greek Minority of Istanbul and Greek-Turkish Relations; 1918–1974, Athens: Centre for Asia Minor Studies, 1992, 2nd edition.Google Scholar
  8. Anadolu Ajansı, ‘We are determined to inaugurate a new era with Athens’, December 6th, 2014. (In Turkish) [http://aa.com.tr/tr/politika/atina-ile-yeni-bir-donemi-acmaya-kararliyiz/94928. Retrieved in December 16th, 2015].
  9. Antoniou, Nt. ‘Papandreou’s Counterproposal to Erdogan’, Kathimerini, January 26th, 2010. (In Greek) [http://www.kathimerini.gr/383084/article/epikairothta/politikh/antiprotash-papandreoy-pros-erntogan. Retrieved in January 20th, 2016]
  10. Arvanitopoulos, C., ed. 2009. Turkey’s Accession to the European Union. An Unusual Candidacy. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Aydın, M., and K. Ifandis. 2004. (eds.) Turkish-Greek Relations. The Security Dilemma in the Aegean. London and New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  12. Berberakis, S. ‘Papandreou came for a new beginning’, Sabah, October 10th, 2009. (in Turkish) [http://www.sabah.com.tr/gundem/2009/10/10/papandreu_yeni_bir_baslangic_icin_geldi. Retrieved in December 15th, 2015].
  13. Billion, D. 1997. La politique extérieure de la Turquie. Une longue quête d’identité. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  14. Birand, M.A. 1978. Bir Pazar Hikayesi. Türkiye-AET ilişkileri. Milliyet: Istanbul.Google Scholar
  15. Bölükbaşı, D. 2011. Dışişleri İskelesi. Dışişleri’nde 34 yıl. Doğan Kitap: Istanbul.Google Scholar
  16. Brecher, M. 1993. Crisis in World Politics Theory and Reality. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Brecher, M., and J. Wilkenfeld. 1997. A Study of crisis. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brecher, M., J. Wilkenfeld, and P. James. 1989. Crisis, Conflict and Instability. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Constas, D., ed. 1991. The Greek–Turkish conflict in the 1990s: Domestic and external influences. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cumhuriyet, ‘There is letter from Papandreou’, 26th January, 2010. (In Turkish) [http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/diger/115026/Papandreu_dan_mektup_var.html#. Retrieved in December 15th, 2015a].
  21. Cumhuriyet, ‘Papandreu cooled the atmosphere!’, January 15th, 2011. (In Turkish) [http://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/diger/211294/Papandreu_havayi_soguttu_.html#. Retrieved in December 16th, 2015b].
  22. Çarkoğlu, A., and B. Rubin, eds. 2005. Greek-Turkish Relations in an era of Détente. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Çetinsaya, G. 1999. Rethinking Nationalism and Islam: Some Preliminary Notes on the Roots of ‘Turkish Islamic Synthesis’ in Modern Turkish Political Thought. The Muslim World 89: 350–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davutoğlu, A. 1994. Alternative Paradigms. The impact of Islamic and Western Weltanschauungs on Political Theory. Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2001. Stratejik Derinlik. Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu. Küre: Istanbul.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2002. Küresel Bunalım. 11 Eylül konuşmaları. Küre: Istanbul.Google Scholar
  27. Davutoğlu A. ‘Turkey’s Foreign Policy Vision: An assessment of 2007’, Insight Turkey, vol. 10, no.1, 2008.Google Scholar
  28. Davutoğlu, A. 2009. “Turkish Foreign Policy and the EU in 2010”. Turkish Policy Quarterly 8: 11–17.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2011. Teoriden Pratiğe. Türk Dış Politikası üzerine konuşmalar. Küre: Istanbul.Google Scholar
  30. Edelman, E.S., et al. 2014. The Roots of the Turkish Conduct: Understanding the evolution of Turkish Policy in the Middle East. BPC: Washington.Google Scholar
  31. Elekdağ, Ş. 1996. “2 ½ War Strategy”. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs 1(1): 33–57.Google Scholar
  32. Ellis, A. ‘Jewish lobby’s leadership in Greece’, Kathimerini, January15th, 2011. (in Greek) [http://www.kathimerini.gr/416671/article/epikairothta/politikh/h-hgesia-toy-evraikoy-lompi-sthn-ellada. Retrieved in December 16th, 2015a]
  33. Ellis, A. ‘In Venizelos and Ataturk’s footsteps’, Kathimerini, Mars 10th, 2013. (In Greek) [http://www.kathimerini.gr/482944/article/epikairothta/politikh/sta-vhmata-venizeloy-kai-atatoyrk. Retrieved in December 16th, 2015b].
  34. Gönlübol, M. and SAR, C. (eds.) Olaylarla Türk Dış Politikası (1919–1990), Ankara: Siyasal, 1993, 8th edition.Google Scholar
  35. Gilpin, R. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. ———. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hale, W. 2000. Turkish Foreign Policy, 1774–200. London: Franc Cass.Google Scholar
  38. Hürriyet, ‘Friendship meeting in Athens’, February 5th, 2000. (in Turkish) [http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/atinada-dostluk-bulusmasi-39131204. Retrieved in 15th December, 2015].
  39. Hürriyet, ‘The decision concerning the “12 [nautical] miles” that was not submitted to voting should be canceled’, April 8th, 2005. (in Turkish) [http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/meclis-te-oylanmayan-12-mil-karari-kalksin-310125. Retrieved in 18th January, 2016].
  40. Kathimerini, ‘Greece ‘can’t discuss’ Aegean refugee patrols with Turkey’, October 13th, 2015. [http://www.ekathimerini.com/202468/article/ekathimerini/news/greece-cant-discuss-aegean-refugee-patrols-with-turkey. Retrieved in 20th January, 2016].
  41. Kathimerini, ‘Junker call on Greece to agree to joint see patrols with Turkey’, October 15th, 2015. [http://www.ekathimerini.com/202511/article/ekathimerini/news/juncker-calls-on-greece-to-agree-to-joint-sea-patrols-with-turkey. Retrieved in 20th January, 2016].
  42. Kelman, I. 2012. Disaster Diplomacy. How disasters Affect Peace and Conflict. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Ker-Lindsay, J. 2007. Crisis and Conciliation. A year of rapprochement between Greece and Turkey. London and New York: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  44. Keridis, D., ed. 2004. The future of Turkish foreign policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Keridis, D., and D. Triantaphyllou, eds. 2001. Greek-Turkish Relations in the Era of Globalization. Dulles VA: Brassey’s.Google Scholar
  46. Kershner, I. and Arango, T. ‘Israel and Turkey Agree to Restore Diplomatic Ties’, The New York Times, 17 December 2015. [http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/18/world/middleeast/israel-turkey-mavi-marmara-gaza.html?_r=0&module=ArrowsNav&contentCollection=Middle%20East&action=keypress&region=FixedLeft&pgtype=article. Retrieved in January 20th, 2016]
  47. Kouskouvelis, I. 2013. “The Problem with Turkey’s “Zero-Problems”. Turkey, Past and Future”. The Middle East Quarterly 20(3): 47–56.Google Scholar
  48. Kramer, H. 2000. A Changing Turkey: The Challenge to Europe and the United States. Washington: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  49. Larrabee, S.F., and I.O. Lesser. 2003. Turkish Foreign Policy in an Age of Uncertainty. RAND: Santa Monica.Google Scholar
  50. Lesser, I.O., F.S. Larrabee, M. Zanini, and K. Vlachos. 2001. Greece’s New Geopolitics. RAND: Santa Monica.Google Scholar
  51. Litsas, S. 2014. “The Greek Failing State and Its ‘Smart Power’ Prospects: A Theoretical Approach”. Mediterranean Quarterly 25(3): 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Milliyet, ‘Letter from Erdoğan to Papandreou’, November 4th 2009. (in Turkish) [http://www.milliyet.com.tr/erdogan-dan-papandreu-ya-mektup/siyaset/siyasetdetay/04.11.2009/1158012/default.htm. Retrieved in December 15th, 2015a].
  53. Milliyet, ‘New chapter in the Aegean’, May 15th, 2010. (in Turkish) [http://www.milliyet.com.tr/ege-de-yeni-sayfa/guncel/gundemdetay/15.05.2010/1238253/default.htm. Retrieved in December 16th, 2015b].
  54. Mufti, M. 1998. “Daring and caution in Turkish Foreign Policy”. Middle East Journal 52(1): 32–50.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 2009. Daring and Caution in Turkish Strategic Culture. London and New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nachmani, A. 1987. Israel, Turkey, and Greece: Uneasy Relations in the East Mediterranean. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  57. Naftemporiki, ‘Reply letter from Papandreou to Erdogan’, January 25th, 2010a. (In Greek) [http://www.naftemporiki.gr/story/306381/apantitiki-epistoli-papandreou-pros-erntogan. Retrieved in January 20th, 2016a].
  58. Naftemporiki, ‘Ant. Samaras demands publication of letters Papandreou-Erdogan’, January 27th, 2010b. (In Greek) [http://www.naftemporiki.gr/story/306032. Retrieved in January 20th, 2016b].
  59. Naftemporiki, ‘Erdogan: Let’s inaugurate a new era in our relations’, May 15th, 2010c. (in Greek) [http://www.naftemporiki.gr/story/291781/erntogan-na-anoiksoume-mia-nea-selida-stis-sxeseis-mas. Retrieved in December 16th, 2015a].
  60. Naftemporiki, ‘G. Papandreou’s message to EU and Turkey concerning the Cypriot issue’, October 20th, 2015. (in Greek) [http://www.naftemporiki.gr/story/229206/minuma-g-papandreou-se-ee-kai-tourkia-gia-kupriako. Retrieved in December 15th, 2015b].
  61. Oran B. (ed.) 2001. Türk Dış Politikası. Kurtuluş Savaşından Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar. Cilt I: 1919–1980, Istanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
  62. ———. 2001. Türk Dış Politikası. Kurtuluş Savaşından Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar. Cilt II: 1980–2001, Istanbul: İletişim.Google Scholar
  63. Oran, B. 2013. (ed.) Türk Dış Politikası. Kurtuluş Savaşından Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar. Cilt III: 2001–20012. İletişim: Istanbul.Google Scholar
  64. Özhan, T. Ete, H. Bölme, S. M. (eds.) ‘2010’da Türkiye’, Series: SETA Analiz, Istanbul: SETA, 2011.Google Scholar
  65. Özkan, B. 2014. “Turkey, Davutoğlu and the idea of Pan-Islamism”. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy 56: 119–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Papachelas, A. ‘How the Greek-Turkish “chemistry” worked’, To Vima, February 6th, 2000. (in Greek) [http://www.tovima.gr/relatedarticles/article/?aid=118910. Retrieved in December 15th, 2015].
  67. Poulton, H. 1997. Top Hat, Grey Wolf and Crescent: Turkish Nationalism and the Turkish Republic. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Raptopoulos, N. 2004. ‘Rediscovering its Arab neighbours? The AKP imprint on Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East’, Les Cahiers du RMES, vol. 1, no.1.Google Scholar
  69. Robins, Ph. 2003. Suits and Uniforms: Turkish Foreign Policy since the Cold War. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
  70. Sander, O. 1984. “Turkish Foreign Policy: Forces of Continuity and of Change”. In Modern Turkey: Continuity and Change, ed. A. Evin, 115–130. Opladen: Leske Verlag & Budrich GmbH.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ta Nea, ‘Erdogan: This visit will have a different end’, May 14th, 2010. (in Greek) [http://www.tanea.gr/news/greece/article/4574699/?iid=2. Retrieved in December 16th, 2015].
  72. Takvim, ‘Historic proposal from Turkey’, November 6th, 2009. (in Turkish) [http://www.takvim.com.tr/gunebakis/2009/11/06/turkiyeden_tarihi_oneri_561421637500. Retrieved in December 15th, 2015].
  73. Tavernise, S. Karassava, A. ‘In a 49-Year First, Greek Leader Visits Turkey’, The New York Times, January 24th, 2008. [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/24/world/europe/24turkey.html?_r=0. Retrieved in December 15th, 2015].
  74. To Vima, ‘A. Samaras demands publication of Papandreou-Erdogan’s letters’, Januray 27th, 2010a. (in Greek) [http://www.tovima.gr/relatedarticles/article/?aid=311989. Retrieved in January 20th, 2016a].
  75. To Vima, ‘Erdogan’s visit. The agreements and the memoranda that have been signed’, May 14th, 2010b. (in Greek) [http://www.tovima.gr/politics/article/?aid=331706&wordsinarticle=%CE%95%CF%81%CE%BD%CF%84%CE%BF%CE%B3%CE%AC%CE%BD. Retrieved in January 20th, 2016b].
  76. To Vima, ‘Samaras-Davutoglou: Commitment for further strengthening of Greek-Turkish relations’, December 6th, 2010c. (in Greek) [http://www.tovima.gr/politics/article/?aid=657129&wordsinarticle=%CE%9D%CF%84%CE%B1%CE%B2%CE%BF%CF%8D%CF%84%CE%BF%CE%B3%CE%BB%CE%BF%CF%85. Retrieved in January 20th, 2016].
  77. T.B.M.M., T.B.M.M. Tutanak Dergisi, Ankara, vol.88, 121 session, June 8th, 1995.Google Scholar
  78. Türk Deniz Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı, Türk Deniz Kuvvetleri Stratejisi, Istanbul: T.C. Deniz Basımevi, May 19th, 2015. [http://www.dzkk.tsk.tr/data/icerik/392/DZKK_STRATEJI.pdf. Retrieved in January 18th, 2016]
  79. Tziambiris, A. 2015. The Emergence of Israeli-Greek Cooperation. Heidelberg and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Waltz, K. 1959. Man, the State, and War: A theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  81. ———. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  82. Vatan, ‘First time after 49 years Greek flag in the [Turkish] Prime Ministry’, January 23rd, 2008. (in Turkish) [http://www.gazetevatan.com/basbakanlik-ta-49-yil-sonra-ilk-kez–yunan-bayragi-158273-gundem/. Retrieved in December 15th, 2015].
  83. Vryonis, Sp. 2005. The Mechanism of Catastrophe: The Turkish Pogrom of September 6–7, 1955, and the Destruction of the Greek Community of Istanbul. New York: NY Greekworks.com.Google Scholar
  84. Zaman, ‘Here[!] Papandreou’s response to Erdoğan’s letter’, 26th January, 2010. (in Turkish) [http://www.zaman.com.tr/dunya_iste-papandreunun-erdogana-cevabi-mektup_944852.html. Retrieved in December 15th, 2015].
  85. Zaman, ‘Let’s burry Cyprus issue with dialogue to the history’, March 3rd, 2013. (in Turkish) [http://www.zaman.com.tr/dunya_kibris-sorununu-diyalogla-tarihe-gomelim_2061124.html. Retrieved in December 16th, 2015].
  86. Zürcher, E.J. 1997. Turkey: A Modern History. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PiraeusPiraeusGreece

Personalised recommendations