An Ambivalence to the Norm Cycle: The African Union’s “New” Approach to Continental Peace and Security

  • Jide Martyns Okeke
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary African Political Economy book series (CONTAPE)

Abstract

The African Union has gained widespread international recognition through its new outcome of sovereignty and collective responsibility to protect espoused by the African Union following its establishment. This chapter argues that the African Union’s conceptual and normative framework has in practice been implemented based on the pursuit of national interests and protection of regime security through the primacy of traditional sovereignty and at best, consent-based intervention.

References

  1. Adésína, A., Y. Graham, and A. Olukoshi. 2005. Africa and the Development Challenges of the New Millennium: The NEPAD Debate. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  2. African Union. 2000. African Union Constitutive Act. https://au.int/en/constitutive-act. Accessed 10 August 2017.
  3. Appiah-Mensah, S. 2005. ‘AU’s Critical Assignment in Darfur: Challenges and Constraints.’ African Security Review 14 (2): 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Coning, C., Linnea Gelot, and J. Karlsrud. 2016. The Future of African Peace Operations. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  5. Dunne, T. 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organisation 52 (4): 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Global Peace Operations Review. 2017. Featured Data. http://peaceoperationsreview.org/featured-data/#unactive. Accessed 8 April 2017.
  8. Guzzini, Stefano. 1998. Realism in International Relations/International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Krasner, S.D. 1995. Power Politics, Institutions, and Transnational Relations. In Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions, ed. Thomas Risse-Kappen, 257–279. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Martin, L., and B. Simmons. 1998. “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions.” International Organisations 54 (4): 729–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morgenthau, Hans J. 1946. Scientific Man Versus Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Risse-Kappen, Thomas, ed. 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Welsh, J. 2010. ‘Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: Where Expectations Meet Reality.’ Ethics and International Affairs 24 (4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wheeler, N. 2000. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jide Martyns Okeke
    • 1
  1. 1.African Union CommissionAddis AbabaEthiopia

Personalised recommendations