An Ambivalence to the Norm Cycle: The African Union’s “New” Approach to Continental Peace and Security
The African Union has gained widespread international recognition through its new outcome of sovereignty and collective responsibility to protect espoused by the African Union following its establishment. This chapter argues that the African Union’s conceptual and normative framework has in practice been implemented based on the pursuit of national interests and protection of regime security through the primacy of traditional sovereignty and at best, consent-based intervention.
- Adésína, A., Y. Graham, and A. Olukoshi. 2005. Africa and the Development Challenges of the New Millennium: The NEPAD Debate. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
- African Union. 2000. African Union Constitutive Act. https://au.int/en/constitutive-act. Accessed 10 August 2017.
- De Coning, C., Linnea Gelot, and J. Karlsrud. 2016. The Future of African Peace Operations. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
- Global Peace Operations Review. 2017. Featured Data. http://peaceoperationsreview.org/featured-data/#unactive. Accessed 8 April 2017.
- Guzzini, Stefano. 1998. Realism in International Relations/International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Krasner, S.D. 1995. Power Politics, Institutions, and Transnational Relations. In Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions, ed. Thomas Risse-Kappen, 257–279. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Morgenthau, Hans J. 1946. Scientific Man Versus Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Risse-Kappen, Thomas, ed. 1995. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Wheeler, N. 2000. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar