South Africa’s Foreign Policy and the International Criminal Court: Of African Lessons, Security Council Reform, and Possibilities for an Improved ICC

  • Max Du Plessis
  • Christopher Gevers
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary African Political Economy book series (CONTAPE)

Abstract

South Africa’s early support for the idea of a permanent International Criminal Court is well known. In particular, its influence at Rome in 1998, where states came together to draft the Statute for the International Criminal Court (ICC), has been chronicled widely and admired deservedly.

References

  1. Asmal, Kader. 2000. ‘International Law and Practice: Dealing with the Past in the South African Experience the Second Annual Grotius Lecture. In Proceedings of the American Society of International Law Annual Meeting, 94: 1–10.Google Scholar
  2. Du Plessis, Max. 2012. Implications of the AU Decision to give the African Court Jurisdiction over International Crimes’. Institute for Security Studies Papers (235), June. Available at https://issafrica.s3.amazonaws.com/site/uploads/Paper235-AfricaCourt.pdf.
  3. Du Plessis, Max. 2017. The Omar Al-Bashir Case: Exploring Efforts to Resolve the Tension between the African Union and the International Criminal Court. In The Pursuit of a Brave New World in International Law: Essays in Honour of John Dugard, ed. Tiyanjana Maluwa, Max du Plessis and Dire Tladi, 431. Leiden, NL: Brill.Google Scholar
  4. Engle, Karen. 2015. Anti-Impunity and the Turn to Criminal Law in Human Rights. Cornell Law Review 100: 1118–1127, 1069–1077, 1087–1090.Google Scholar
  5. Graham, Matthew. 2012. “Foreign Policy in Transition: The ANC’s Search for a Foreign Policy Direction During South Africa’s Transition, 1990–1994.” The Roundtable 101 (5): 86–97.Google Scholar
  6. Graham, Suzanne. 2008. Gold Star or Bottom of the Class: Is South Africa a Good International Citizen?. South African Journal of International Affairs 15 (1): 87–97.Google Scholar
  7. Lipton, Merle. 2009. Understanding South Africa’s Foreign Policy: The Perplexing Case of Zimbabwe. South African Journal of International Affairs 16 (3): 331–346.Google Scholar
  8. Mandela, Nelson. 1993. “South Africa’s Future Foreign Policy.” Foreign Affairs 72 (5): 86–97.Google Scholar
  9. Mandela, Nelson. 1997. South African Journal of International Affairs 5(2): 156–215.Google Scholar
  10. McAuliffe, Padraig. 2014. From Watchdog to Workhorse: Explaining the Emergence of the ICC’s Burden-sharing Policy as an Example of Creeping Cosmopolitanism. Chinese Journal of International Law 13 (2): 259–296.Google Scholar
  11. Megret, Frederic. 2001. Three Dangers for the International Criminal Court: A Critical Look at a Consensual Project. Finnish Y.B. Int’l L. 12: 193–194.Google Scholar
  12. Monyae, David. 2012. ‘The Evolving “Doctrine” of Multilateralism in South Africa’s Africa Policy’, In South African Foreign Policy Review: Volume I, ed. Landsberg and Van Wyk, 139–152.Google Scholar
  13. Schabas, William A. 2010. The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute, 333.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, Karen. 2012. Soft Power: The Essence of South Africa’s Foreign Policy, In South African Foreign Policy Review: Volume I, ed. Landsberg and Van Wyk, 73.Google Scholar
  15. Spence, Jack. 1996. The Debate over South Africa’s Foreign Policy. South African Journal of International Affairs 4 (1): 118–125.Google Scholar
  16. Van Wyk, Jo-Ansie. 2012. Reflections on South Africa’s Post-Apartheid Foreign Policy and Preliminary Comments on Future Foreign Policy, In South African Foreign Policy Review: Volume I, ed. Landsberg and Van Wyk, 277.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Max Du Plessis
    • 1
  • Christopher Gevers
    • 2
  1. 1.Senior Research FellowInstitute for Security StudiesPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.University of KwaZulu-NatalDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations