Skip to main content

European National Policies Aimed at Stimulating Return Migration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Return Migration and Regional Development in Europe

Part of the book series: New Geographies of Europe ((NGE))

Abstract

The so-called brain drain is a long-standing phenomenon: the best-known example is the migration of skilled professionals from the countries of the Global South to ones in the Global North. The changes in regimes in 1989–90, plus the liberalisation of borders created an entirely new situation with regard to migration in Central Europe and a new dimension of the migration processes has emerged. The enlargement of the European Union (EU) in 2004 and 2007 and the acceptance of new acts and agreements, such as the free movement of people, re-drew migration patterns within Europe significantly. As a result of systemic changes, and more recently EU accession, the economically active and mobile parts of these societies, in particular the young and well-educated, began to move in large numbers towards Western Europe, especially the economically more prosperous and competitive regions (i.e. core regions). The destinations of this labour movement also turned gradually towards those countries of the EU that were previously considered peripheral and were to some extent sources than destinations of migration (for example, Ireland and Spain). These countries were turned into destinations, mainly as a result of the labour flow arriving from the new member states (Kahanec and Zimmermann 2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agunias, D. (2006). From a zero-sum to a win-win scenario: Literature review on circular migration. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awad, I. (2009). The global economic crisis and migrant workers: Impact and response. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beine, M., Docquer, F., & Rapoport, H. (2001). Brain drain and economic growth: Theory and evidence. Journal of Development Economics, 64, 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J., & Hamada, K. (1974). The brain drain, international integration of markets for professionals and unemployment: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Development Economics, 1(1), 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J., & Rodriguez, C. (1975). Welfare-theoretical analyses of the brain drain. Journal of Development Economics, 2, 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeri, T. (2008). Brain gain: A European approach. Introduction. CESifo Forum, 9(3), 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. (2000). International migration at the beginning of the twenty-first century: Global trends and issues. International Social Science Journal, 52(165), 269–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerna, L. (2010). Policies and practices of highly skilled migration in times of the economic crisis. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haas, H. (2007a). Turning the tide? Why development will not stop migration. Development and Change, 38(5), 819–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haas, H. (2007b). Migration and development: A theoretical perspective (COMCAD Working Papers No. 29). Oxford: International Migration Institute, James Martin 21st Century School, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drbohlav, D., Hárs, Á., & Grabowska-Lusińska, I. (2009). Experiencing immigration. Comparative analysis of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland (IDEA Working Papers No. 14). Warsaw, Poland: Centre of Migration Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurofund. (2012). Labour mobility within the EU: The impact of return migration. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC). (2008). Employment in Europe 2008. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission (Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC). (2011a). European agenda for the integration of third-country nationals. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Retrieved August 7, 2014, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0455/COM_COM%282011%290455_EN.pdf.

  • European Commission (EC). (2011b). Migration and development. The global approach to migration and mobility. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Retrieved August 7, 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/pdf/1_en_act_part1_v9_com2011-743_en.pdf.

  • European Commission (EC). (2012). Single Market Act II – Together for new growth. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC). (2013). Maximising the development impact of migration. The EU contribution for the UN high-level dialogue and next steps towards broadening the development-migration nexus. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Retrieved August 7, 2014, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2013:0292:FIN:EN:PDF.

  • Ferri, A., & Rainero, S. (Eds.) (2010). Survey of European Union and return migration policies: The case of Romanian migrants. Mestre, Italy: Veneto Lavoro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannocolo, P. (2005). ‘Brain drain competition’ policies in Europe: A survey (Department of Statistics series Working Paper No. 2006-02-01). Milan, Italy: Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpert, D., & Parkes, R. (2011). Split citizenship: Immigrant integration in an age of circular migration (AIES Fokus 01/2011). Maria Enzersdorf: Austria Institut für Europa- und Sicherheitspolitik.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2010a). Fact-sheet on the impact of the economic crisis on return migration. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Migration, Global Migration Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2010b). Mainstreaming migration into development planning—A handbook for policy-makers and practitioners. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Migration, Global Migration Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarczyk, P., & Lesińska, L. (2013). Return migration, state policy and integration of returnees - The case of Poland. In I. Zwania-Rößler & V. Ivanova (Eds.), Welcome home? Challenges and chances of return migration (pp. 29–34). Washington, DC: Transatlantic Forum on Migration and Integration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahanec, M., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2011). High-skilled immigration policy in Europe. Berlin, Germany: DIW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuptsch, C. (2012). The economic crisis and labour migration policy in European countries. Comparative population studies. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft, 37(1–2), 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowell, B. L. (2002). Policy responses to the international mobility of skilled labour. Geneva, Switzerland: International Migration Branch, International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., & Radu, D. (2012). Return migration: The experience of Eastern Europe. International Migration, 50(6), 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). International migration outlook 2008. Paris: SOPEMI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). International migration outlook 2013. Paris: SOPEMI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano, G.I.P., & Peri, G. (2012). Rethinking the effects of immigration on wages (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 12497). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascouau, Y. (2013). Intra-EU mobility: The second ‘building block’ of EU labour migration policy (Issue Paper No. 74). Brussels, Belgium: European Policy Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sills, S. J. (2008). Return migration. In R. T. Schaefer (Ed.), Encyclopedia of race, ethnicity, and society (pp. 1158–1159). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOPEMI. (2008). International migration outlook. Annual report 2008 edition (pp. 161–222). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuda, T. G. (2010). Ethnic return migration and the nation-state: Encouraging the diaspora to return ‘home’. Nations and Nationalism, 16(4), 616–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP – United Nations Development Programme. (2007). Case evidence on ’brain gain’. UNDP capacity development action briefs 1. New York: UNDP. Retrieved August 7, 2014, from http://www.cctr.ust.hk/materials/library/Case_Evidence_on_Brain_Gain.UNDP.pdf.

  • United Nations Statistics Division. (1998). Recommendations on statistics of international migration, Revision 1. New York: United Nations. Retrieved August 7, 2014, from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/SeriesM/SeriesM_58rev1e.pdf.

  • United Nations Working Group on International Migration. (1998). Report of the United Nations Technical Symposium on International Migration and Development. The Hague, Netherlands, 29 June–3 July 1998. New York: United Nations Population Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2013). Report of the Secretary-General on international migration and development (Report A/68/190 of the Secretary-General). New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickramasekara, P. (2011). Circular migration: A triple win or a dead end? (Global Union Research Network Discussion Paper No. 15). Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office. Retrieved August 7, 2014, from http://www.migration4development.org/sites/m4d.emakina-eu.net/files/no15-mar11-circular-migration-a-triple-win-or-a-dead-end.pdf.

  • Wise, R.D., Covarubbias, H.M., & Puentes, R. (2010). Reframing the debate on migration, development and human rights: Fundamental elements. Zacatecas: International Network on Migration and Development. Retrieved October 7, 2015, from http://rimd.reduaz.mx/documentos_miembros/ReframingtheDebate.pdf.

  • Zwania-Rößler, I., & Ivanova, V. (Eds.) (2013). Welcome home? Challenges and chances of return migration. Washington, DC: Transatlantic Forum on Migration and Integration.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Lajos Boros’ research was supported by the European Union and the State of Hungary, co-financed by the European Social Fund in the framework of TÁMOP-4.2.4.A/2-11/1-2012-0001 ‘National Excellence Program’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boros, L., Hegedűs, G. (2016). European National Policies Aimed at Stimulating Return Migration. In: Nadler, R., Kovács, Z., Glorius, B., Lang, T. (eds) Return Migration and Regional Development in Europe. New Geographies of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57509-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57509-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57508-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57509-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics