Abstract
Herman Melville’s long short story ‘Bartleby, The Scrivener’ (1997/1853) aroused a great deal of interest and fascination both within psychoanalysis and philosophy, but had a markedly different reception within those two disciplines. It is my intention here to elaborate on this divergence in understanding not only in order to draw attention to the range of interpretations this famous story gave rise to, but to use it as a means to raise questions about the practice of psychoanalytic interpretation itself. Confronted with a character as patently unassimilable as Bartleby, what does psychoanalysis suggest? Linking Freud’s notion of the ‘foreign body’ with philosophical ideas about immunity, I intend to make the case for the kind of psychoanalysis which retains its original critical, and even provocative, potential. But let us first turn to ‘Bartleby’.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agamben, G. (1993). The coming community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben, G. (1999). Bartleby, or on contingency. potentialities: Collected essays in philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bollas, C. (1974). Melville’s lost self: Bartleby. American Imago, 31, 401–411.
Deines, T. J. (2006). Bartleby the scrivener, immanence and the resistance of community. Culture Machine, 6. Retrieved from http://www.culturemachine.net.
Deleuze, G. (1997). Bartleby or the formula. Essays critical and clinical. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Derrida, J. (1995). The gift of death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Esposito, R. (2011). Immunitas. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Freud, S. (1895). Studies on Hysteria. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume II (1893-1895). (J. Strachey, Trans.). London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
Friedli, L., & Stearn, R. (2015). Positive affect as coercive strategy: Conditionality, activation and the role of psychology in UK government workfare programmes. In Medical Humanities, 41, 40–47.
Grosz, S. (2013). The examined life. London: Chatto & Windus.
Hadot, P. (2002). What is ancient philosophy? Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Kestenbaum, C. J. (2008). Autism, Asperger’s and other oddities…: Thoughts about treatment approaches. American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Dynamic Psychiatry, 279–294.
Lacan, J. (2007). Ecrits. (B. Fink, Trans.). New York & London: W.W. Norton.
Levy, S. T., & Inderbitzin, L. B. (1989). Negativism and countertransference. Journal American Phychonalytic Associatition, 37, 7–30.
Meltzer, D. (1975). The psychology of autistic states and of post-autistic mentality. Explorations in Autism: A Psycho-Analytical Study, 6–29.
Melville, H. (1997/1853). Bartleby, the scrivener. Billy budd, sailor and selected tales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Phillips, A. (2000). Promises, promises. London: Faber & Faber.
Schneider, G. (2003). Die Zukunft? Plädoyer für eine atopische Grundhaltung in der Psychoanalysemit einem Exkurs zu Melvilles Bartleby. Psyche, 57, 226–249.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prall, W. (2017). To Be or Bartleby—Psychoanalysis and the Crisis of Immunity. In: Auestad, L., Treacher Kabesh, A. (eds) Traces of Violence and Freedom of Thought. Studies in the Psychosocial. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57502-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57502-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57501-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57502-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)