Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Responsibility to Protect in Libya and Syria: Europe, the USA and Global Human Rights Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The West and the Global Power Shift

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

Abstract

Tocci starts off by recalling that values, prime amongst which human rights and fundamental freedoms, democracy and free market capitalism, have traditionally been the lynchpin of the transatlantic bond. Based on this broadly shared bedrock of liberal values, her chapter gauges the effectiveness of the transatlantic partners to enshrine individual human rights in the global governance architecture. In particular, it concentrates on a political norm in-the-making—the Responsibility to Protect (R2P). To what extent are the European Union and the United States, in partnership and/or independently, succeeding in entrenching R2P as an accepted political norm at the global level? In particular, to what extent are non-Western powers, notably the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) endorsing R2P? How did the international response to the conflicts in Libya and Syria affect the global conversation over R2P?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Africa, S., & Pretorius, R. (2012). South Africa, the African Union and the responsibility to protect: The case of Libya. African Human Rights Law Journal, 12(2), 394–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, R. (2009). The Russian case for military intervention in Georgia. European Security, 18(2), 173–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2006). Wither the responsibility to protect? Ethics and International Affairs, 20(2), 143–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J., & Williams, P. D. (2011). The new politics of protection? CĂ´te d’Ivoire, Libya and the responsibility to protect. International Affairs, 87(4), 825–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, T. (2013, March). Brazil as a norm entrepreneur: The “Responsibility while protecting” initiative, GPPI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolopion, P. (2011). After Libya, the question: To protect or depose? LA Times, 25 August. http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/25/opinion/la-oe-bolopion-libya-responsibility-t20110825

  • Bush, R., Martiniello, G., & Mercer, C. (2011). Humanitarian imperialism. Review of African Political Economy, 38, 357–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capie, D. (2012). The responsibility to protect norm in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 25(1), 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, B. (2008). Indian politics and society since independence. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charp, S. (2013). Russia, Syria and the doctrine of intervention. Survival, 55, 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dembinski, M., & Reinold, T. (2011). Libya and the future of the responsibility to protect- African and European perspectives. Peace Research Institute Frankfurt, 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council. (2003, December 12). A Secure Europe in a better world. European security strategy. http://ue.eu.int/pressdata/EN/reports/78367.pdf

  • European Parliament. (2011). Resolution 10 March on the Southern neighbourhood, and Libya in particular. EP, Doc PV P7_TA(2011)0095. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P7-TA-2011-0095&language=EN

  • Evans, G. (2012, July 20). The R2P after Libya and Syria. Castan Centre for Human Rights Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanville, L. (2012). The responsibility to protect beyond borders. Human Rights Law Review, 12(1), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, I. (2013). Tilting at windmills? The Indian debate over the responsibility to protect after UNSC resolution 1973. Global Responsibility to Protect, 5(1), 84–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hehir, A. (2012). The responsibility to protect. Rhetoric, reality and the future of humanitarian intervention. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICISS. (2001). The responsibility to protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentleson, B. W. (2012). The Obama administration and R2P: Progress, problems and prospects. Global Responsibility to Protect, 4(4), 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenkel, K. M. (2012). Brazil and R2P: Does taking responsibility mean using force? Global Responsibility to Protect, 4, 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuperman, K. (2008). The Moral Hazard of humanitarian intervention. International Studies Quarterly, 52(1), 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuperman, A. J. (2013). A model humanitarian intervention? Reassessing NATO’s Libya campaign. International Security, 38(1), 105–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, C. (2010). Pax South Africana and the R2P. Global Responsibility to Protect, 2, 436–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luttwak, E. (1999–2000). Kofi’s rule. The national interest, 58, 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkiszak, M. (2013, May). Responsibility to protect…itself? FIIA Briefing Paper 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, V. (2013). The future under international law of the responsibility to protect after Libya and Syria. Michigan State University Journal of International Law, 21(1), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obama, B. (2011, March 28). Remarks by the president in address to the nation on Libya at National Defense University. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/03/28/remarks-president-address-nation-libya

  • Pattison, J. (2013). The ethics of “responsibility while protecting”. Human Rights and Human Welfare, Working Paper 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prantl, J., & Nakano, R. (2011). Global norm diffusion in East Asia. NTS Working Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinton-Brown, P. (2013). Mapping dissent: The responsibility to protect and its state critics. Global Responsibility to Protect, 5(3), 260–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinold, T. (2011). The United States and the responsibility to protect: Impediment, bystander, or norm leader? Global Responsibility to Protect, 3(1), 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saira, M. (2012). Taking stock of the responsibility to protect. Stanford Journal of International Law, 48, 319–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, M. (2011). The responsibility to protect and its critics: Explaining the consensus. Global Responsibility to Protect, 3, 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spektor, M. (2012). Humanitarian interventionism Brazilian style? Americas Quarterly, 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian. (2011). Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy: No let-up in Libya until Gaddafi departs. Gaddafi must go and go for good. The Guardian, 15 April 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSG. (2009). Report on the implementation of R2P. New York: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSG. (2010). Report on early warning, assessment and the responsibility to protect. New York: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSG. (2012, July 25). Responsibility to protect: Timely and decisive response. General Assembly Security Council (p. 15). http://www.responsibilitytoprotect.org/UNSG%20Report_timely%20and%20decisive%20response(1).pdf

  • UN Week. (2011, February 28). The inside view on the UN. UN Week, 2 February 11. http://unasouthernny.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/un-week-22811/

  • US Department of State. (2010). The first quadrennial diplomacy and development review: Leading through civilian power. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/153108.pdf

  • Weiss, T. (2004). The sunset of humanitarian intervention? Security Dialogue, 35(2), 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome, Italy

    Nathalie Tocci

Authors
  1. Nathalie Tocci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI), Rome, Italy

    Riccardo Alcaro

  2. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

    John Peterson

  3. Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI), Rome, Italy

    Ettore Greco

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tocci, N. (2016). The Responsibility to Protect in Libya and Syria: Europe, the USA and Global Human Rights Governance. In: Alcaro, R., Peterson, J., Greco, E. (eds) The West and the Global Power Shift. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57486-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation