Abstract
This chapter explores the role of the workplace in employees’ job quality using a composite indicator of non-pecuniary job quality and declared job satisfaction. Where one works plays an important role in shaping employee perceptions of job quality, over and above the individual and job traits which appear in most studies. We find managerial practices, the composition of the workforce, and worker representation all affect employees’ perceptions of job quality. We discuss how the findings enhance our understanding of British and French employment relations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
In both countries factor analysis identifies a single factor with an eigenvalue above 1 (2.23 in France and 1.92 in Britain). In France (Britain) this accounts for 96 (89) percent of the variance in the eight items. All items load reasonably on the single factor with the exception of job demands: in both countries job demands are strongly correlated only with work–life balance. The alpha reliability coefficient for the non-pecuniary job satisfaction scale is 0.60 in France and 0.51 in Britain.
- 4.
All models are survey weighted to account for the probability of employee and workplace selection into the sample. These weights also make adjustments for differential non-response on observable traits. Standard errors are clustered to account for the non-independence of employee observations clustered within workplaces. Where an observation is missing on an independent variable it is identified by a “1” denoting missing on a dummy variable.
- 5.
Studies often find those on non-permanent contracts have lower job quality than permanent employees (Green et al. 2013; OECD 2014). But in a recent study using the European Working Conditions Survey 2010 Green et al. (2013) found no job quality differential between temporary and permanent jobs. They conjecture that temporary jobs may be improving in quality. In any event, we find no differential in non-pecuniary job quality for those on temporary or fixed-term contracts compared to those on permanent contracts in our population, namely, those with at least 12 months’ tenure working in workplaces with at least 11 employees.
- 6.
These results are not shown in the table but are available on request.
- 7.
Industry affiliation was also statistically significant. Results are available on request.
- 8.
“On the whole, are you very satisfied, satisfied, not very satisfied or not at all satisfied with working conditions in your main paid job?” Source: Eurofound
https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/fr/surveys/data-visualisation/european-working-conditions-survey-2010. The EU15 average for very satisfied/satisfied was 85%.
- 9.
WERS refers to “training you receive” whereas REPONSE refers to “your training opportunities.”
- 10.
Pay dissatisfaction is very strong in France, and it has been discussed in many papers (e.g. Askenazy et al. 2013).
- 11.
Factor analyses on the 10,457 REPONSE respondents without missing job satisfaction data identified a single factor with an eigenvalue of 2.08. Inter-item correlations ranged between 0.49 and 0.72. The alpha reliability scale was 0.78. The WERS analysis was run on 10,901 respondents without missing data. It identified a single factor with an eigenvalue of 4.30 and inter-item correlations between 0.24 and 0.78. The alpha reliability scale was 0.88.
- 12.
Those aged 65 and over express particularly high levels of job satisfaction, while young teenagers have the lowest satisfaction. However, these age groups have relatively low labour market participation rates in France.
- 13.
These occupational effects are not presented in the tables but are available on request.
References
Akerlof, G., Rose, A., & Yellen, J. (1988). Job switching and job satisfaction in the U.S. labor market. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 495–594.
Anxo, D., & Boulin, J. Y. (2006). The organisation of time over the life course: European trends. European Societies, 8(2), 319–341.
Askenazy, P., & Erhel, C. (2015). Productivity puzzles in France (IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 9188). Forthcoming in Askenazy, P., Bellmann, L., Bryson, A., & Moreno-Galbis, E. (Eds.). Productivity puzzles across Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Askenazy, P., Bozio, A., & García-Peñalosa, C. (2013). Dynamique des salaires par temps de crise. Les Notes du Conseil d’Analyse Économique, No. 5, April.
Barmby, T., Bryson, A., & Eberth, B. (2012). Human capital, matching and job satisfaction. Economics Letters, 117(3), 548–551.
Böckerman, P., Bryson, A., & Ilmakunnas, P. (2013). Does high involvement management lead to higher pay? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 176(4), 861–885.
Breda, T. (2015). Féminisation et performances économiques et sociales des entreprises. Institut des Politiques Publiques (Report Number 12).
Brown, C. (1980). Equalizing differences in the labor market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94, 113–134.
Brown, A., Charlwood, A., & Spencer, D. A. (2012). Not all that it might seem: Why job satisfaction is worth studying despite it being a poor measure of job quality. Work, Employment and Society, 26, 1007–1018.
Bryson, A., Cappellari, L., & Lucifora, C. (2004). Does union membership really reduce job satisfaction?, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(3), 439–459.
Bryson, A., & Freeman, R. (2013). Employee perceptions of working conditions and the desire for worker representation in Britain and the US. Journal of Labor Research, 34(1), 1–29.
Bryson, A., & Green, F. (2015). Unions and job quality. In A. Felstead, D. Gallie, & F. Green (Eds.), Unequal Britain at work (pp. 130–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clark, A. (1997). Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work? Labour Economics, 4, 341–372.
Clark, A. (2011). Worker wellbeing in booms and busts. In P. Gregg & J. Wadsworth (Eds.), The labour market in winter: The state of working Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cooke, G. B., Donaghey, J., & Zeytinoglu, I. U. (2013). The nuanced nature of work quality: Evidence from rural Newfoundland and Ireland. Human Relations, 66 (4), 503–527.
Davoine, L. (2007). La qualité de l’emploi. Une perspective européenne. Ph.D. thesis, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.
Davoine, L., Erhel, C., & Guergoat-Larivière, M. (2008). Monitoring employment quality in work: European employment strategy indicators and beyond. International Labour Review, 147(2–3), 163–198.
Erhel, C., & Guergoat-Larivière, M. (2011). Job quality: A comparative perspective on the basis of EU indicators. WISO—Wirtschafts- und SozialpolitischeZeitschrift, 34, 143–159.
Esser, I., & Olsen, K. (2011). Perceived job quality: Autonomy and job security within a multi-level framework. European Sociological Review, 28(4), 443–454.
Forth, J., Bewley, H., & Bryson, A. (2006). Small and medium-sized enterprises: Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. London: Department of Trade and Industry.
Freeman, R. B. (1978). Job satisfaction as an economic variable. The American Sociological Review, 68(2), 135–141.
Gallie, D. (Ed.). (2007). Employment regimes and the quality of work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gautié, J., & Schmitt, J. (Eds.). (2010). Low wage work in the wealthy world. New York: Russell Sage.
Glass, J. (1990). The impact of occupational segregation on working conditions. Social Forces, 68, 779–796.
Green, F. (2010). Well-being, job satisfaction and labour mobility. Labour Economics, 17(6), 897–903.
Green, F., Mostafa, A., Parent-Thirion, A., Vermeylen, G., Van Houten, G., Biletta, I., & Lyly-Yrjanainen, M. (2013). Is job quality becoming more unequal? Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 66(2), 753–794.
ILO. (2012). Decent work indicators: Concepts and definitions, ILO manual (1st Ed.). Geneva: ILO manual/International Labour Office. Accessed May 2012.
Kaiser, L. (2005). Gender-job satisfaction differences across Europe: An indicator for labor market modernization (IZA DP, No. 1876).
Karasek, J. R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308.
Muñoz de Bustillo, R., Fernández-Macías, E., Esteve, F., & Antón, J.-I. (2011). E pluribus unum? A critical survey of job quality indicators. Socio-Economic Review, 9(3), 447–475.
OECD. (2014). Employment outlook 2014. Paris: OECD.
Osterman, P. (2008). Improving job quality: Policies aimed at the demand side of the low-wage labor market. In T. J. Bartik & S. N. Houseman (Eds.), America’s challenge in the global economy (pp. 203–244). Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute.
Pagell, M., & Barber, A. E. (2000). The strategic choice of operator skills in CNC installations. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), 65–86.
Reskin, A. F., & Roos, P. (Eds.). (1990). Job queues, gender queues. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Rosen, S. (1986). The theory of equalizing differences. In O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (pp. 641–692). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Senik, C. (2011). The French unhappiness puzzle: The cultural dimension of happiness (IZA Discussion Paper No. 6175).
Siebern-Thomas, F. (2005). Job quality in European labour markets. In S. Bazen, C. Lucifora, & W. Salverda (Eds.), Job quality and employer behaviour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sousa-Poza, A., & Sousa-Poza, A. A. (2000). Taking another look at the gender/job-satisfaction paradox. Kyklos 53 (2), 135–151.
Stier, H., & Yaish, M. (2014). Occupational segregation and gender inequality in job quality: A multi-level approach. Work, Employment and Society, 26, 1–22.
Stride, C., Wall, T. D., & Catley, N. (2007). Measures of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, mental health and job-related well-being: A benchmarking manual. Chichester: Wiley.
Van Wanrooy, B., Bewley, H., Bryson, A., Forth, J., Freeth, S., Stokes, L., & Wood, S. (2013). Employment relations in the shadow of recession: Findings from the 2011 Workplace Employment Relations Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
White, M., & Bryson, A. (2013a). Positive employee attitudes: How much human resource management do you need? Human Relations 66 (3), 385–406.
White, M., & Bryson, A. (2013b). Not So Dissatisfied After All? The Impact of Union Coverage on Job Satisfaction, NIESR Discussion Paper No. 412.
Wood, S., & Bryson, A. (Eds.). (2009). High involvement management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bryson, A., Erhel, C., Salibekyan, Z. (2016). Job Quality. In: Amossé, T., Bryson, A., Forth, J., Petit, H. (eds) Comparative Workplace Employment Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57419-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57419-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57418-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57419-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)