Skip to main content

Job Quality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter explores the role of the workplace in employees’ job quality using a composite indicator of non-pecuniary job quality and declared job satisfaction. Where one works plays an important role in shaping employee perceptions of job quality, over and above the individual and job traits which appear in most studies. We find managerial practices, the composition of the workforce, and worker representation all affect employees’ perceptions of job quality. We discuss how the findings enhance our understanding of British and French employment relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Job satisfaction is worthy of investigation in its own right since it predicts job quits (Freeman 1978; Green 2010).

  2. 2.

    Some comparative surveys show a high level of work intensity in France (OECD 2014). However, using identical survey questions in the European Working Conditions Survey Green et al. (2013) find work intensity is similar in Britain and France.

  3. 3.

    In both countries factor analysis identifies a single factor with an eigenvalue above 1 (2.23 in France and 1.92 in Britain). In France (Britain) this accounts for 96 (89) percent of the variance in the eight items. All items load reasonably on the single factor with the exception of job demands: in both countries job demands are strongly correlated only with work–life balance. The alpha reliability coefficient for the non-pecuniary job satisfaction scale is 0.60 in France and 0.51 in Britain.

  4. 4.

    All models are survey weighted to account for the probability of employee and workplace selection into the sample. These weights also make adjustments for differential non-response on observable traits. Standard errors are clustered to account for the non-independence of employee observations clustered within workplaces. Where an observation is missing on an independent variable it is identified by a “1” denoting missing on a dummy variable.

  5. 5.

    Studies often find those on non-permanent contracts have lower job quality than permanent employees (Green et al. 2013; OECD 2014). But in a recent study using the European Working Conditions Survey 2010 Green et al. (2013) found no job quality differential between temporary and permanent jobs. They conjecture that temporary jobs may be improving in quality. In any event, we find no differential in non-pecuniary job quality for those on temporary or fixed-term contracts compared to those on permanent contracts in our population, namely, those with at least 12 months’ tenure working in workplaces with at least 11 employees.

  6. 6.

    These results are not shown in the table but are available on request.

  7. 7.

    Industry affiliation was also statistically significant. Results are available on request.

  8. 8.

    “On the whole, are you very satisfied, satisfied, not very satisfied or not at all satisfied with working conditions in your main paid job?” Source: Eurofound

    https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/fr/surveys/data-visualisation/european-working-conditions-survey-2010. The EU15 average for very satisfied/satisfied was 85%.

  9. 9.

    WERS refers to “training you receive” whereas REPONSE refers to “your training opportunities.”

  10. 10.

    Pay dissatisfaction is very strong in France, and it has been discussed in many papers (e.g. Askenazy et al. 2013).

  11. 11.

    Factor analyses on the 10,457 REPONSE respondents without missing job satisfaction data identified a single factor with an eigenvalue of 2.08. Inter-item correlations ranged between 0.49 and 0.72. The alpha reliability scale was 0.78. The WERS analysis was run on 10,901 respondents without missing data. It identified a single factor with an eigenvalue of 4.30 and inter-item correlations between 0.24 and 0.78. The alpha reliability scale was 0.88.

  12. 12.

    Those aged 65 and over express particularly high levels of job satisfaction, while young teenagers have the lowest satisfaction. However, these age groups have relatively low labour market participation rates in France.

  13. 13.

    These occupational effects are not presented in the tables but are available on request.

References

  • Akerlof, G., Rose, A., & Yellen, J. (1988). Job switching and job satisfaction in the U.S. labor market. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 495–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anxo, D., & Boulin, J. Y. (2006). The organisation of time over the life course: European trends. European Societies, 8(2), 319–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askenazy, P., & Erhel, C. (2015). Productivity puzzles in France (IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 9188). Forthcoming in Askenazy, P., Bellmann, L., Bryson, A., & Moreno-Galbis, E. (Eds.). Productivity puzzles across Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askenazy, P., Bozio, A., & García-Peñalosa, C. (2013). Dynamique des salaires par temps de crise. Les Notes du Conseil d’Analyse Économique, No. 5, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmby, T., Bryson, A., & Eberth, B. (2012). Human capital, matching and job satisfaction. Economics Letters, 117(3), 548–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böckerman, P., Bryson, A., & Ilmakunnas, P. (2013). Does high involvement management lead to higher pay? Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 176(4), 861–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breda, T. (2015). Féminisation et performances économiques et sociales des entreprises. Institut des Politiques Publiques (Report Number 12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (1980). Equalizing differences in the labor market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94, 113–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., Charlwood, A., & Spencer, D. A. (2012). Not all that it might seem: Why job satisfaction is worth studying despite it being a poor measure of job quality. Work, Employment and Society, 26, 1007–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, A., Cappellari, L., & Lucifora, C. (2004). Does union membership really reduce job satisfaction?, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(3), 439–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, A., & Freeman, R. (2013). Employee perceptions of working conditions and the desire for worker representation in Britain and the US. Journal of Labor Research, 34(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, A., & Green, F. (2015). Unions and job quality. In A. Felstead, D. Gallie, & F. Green (Eds.), Unequal Britain at work (pp. 130–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1997). Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work? Labour Economics, 4, 341–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2011). Worker wellbeing in booms and busts. In P. Gregg & J. Wadsworth (Eds.), The labour market in winter: The state of working Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, G. B., Donaghey, J., & Zeytinoglu, I. U. (2013). The nuanced nature of work quality: Evidence from rural Newfoundland and Ireland. Human Relations, 66 (4), 503–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoine, L. (2007). La qualité de l’emploi. Une perspective européenne. Ph.D. thesis, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davoine, L., Erhel, C., & Guergoat-Larivière, M. (2008). Monitoring employment quality in work: European employment strategy indicators and beyond. International Labour Review, 147(2–3), 163–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erhel, C., & Guergoat-Larivière, M. (2011). Job quality: A comparative perspective on the basis of EU indicators. WISO—Wirtschafts- und SozialpolitischeZeitschrift, 34, 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, I., & Olsen, K. (2011). Perceived job quality: Autonomy and job security within a multi-level framework. European Sociological Review, 28(4), 443–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forth, J., Bewley, H., & Bryson, A. (2006). Small and medium-sized enterprises: Findings from the 2004 Workplace Employment Relations Survey. London: Department of Trade and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. B. (1978). Job satisfaction as an economic variable. The American Sociological Review, 68(2), 135–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, D. (Ed.). (2007). Employment regimes and the quality of work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautié, J., & Schmitt, J. (Eds.). (2010). Low wage work in the wealthy world. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J. (1990). The impact of occupational segregation on working conditions. Social Forces, 68, 779–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, F. (2010). Well-being, job satisfaction and labour mobility. Labour Economics, 17(6), 897–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, F., Mostafa, A., Parent-Thirion, A., Vermeylen, G., Van Houten, G., Biletta, I., & Lyly-Yrjanainen, M. (2013). Is job quality becoming more unequal? Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 66(2), 753–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO. (2012). Decent work indicators: Concepts and definitions, ILO manual (1st Ed.). Geneva: ILO manual/International Labour Office. Accessed May 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, L. (2005). Gender-job satisfaction differences across Europe: An indicator for labor market modernization (IZA DP, No. 1876).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, J. R. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz de Bustillo, R., Fernández-Macías, E., Esteve, F., & Antón, J.-I. (2011). E pluribus unum? A critical survey of job quality indicators. Socio-Economic Review, 9(3), 447–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). Employment outlook 2014. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, P. (2008). Improving job quality: Policies aimed at the demand side of the low-wage labor market. In T. J. Bartik & S. N. Houseman (Eds.), America’s challenge in the global economy (pp. 203–244). Kalamazoo: W.E. Upjohn Institute.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., & Barber, A. E. (2000). The strategic choice of operator skills in CNC installations. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, A. F., & Roos, P. (Eds.). (1990). Job queues, gender queues. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1986). The theory of equalizing differences. In O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (pp. 641–692). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senik, C. (2011). The French unhappiness puzzle: The cultural dimension of happiness (IZA Discussion Paper No. 6175).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebern-Thomas, F. (2005). Job quality in European labour markets. In S. Bazen, C. Lucifora, & W. Salverda (Eds.), Job quality and employer behaviour. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa-Poza, A., & Sousa-Poza, A. A. (2000). Taking another look at the gender/job-satisfaction paradox. Kyklos 53 (2), 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier, H., & Yaish, M. (2014). Occupational segregation and gender inequality in job quality: A multi-level approach. Work, Employment and Society, 26, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stride, C., Wall, T. D., & Catley, N. (2007). Measures of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, mental health and job-related well-being: A benchmarking manual. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wanrooy, B., Bewley, H., Bryson, A., Forth, J., Freeth, S., Stokes, L., & Wood, S. (2013). Employment relations in the shadow of recession: Findings from the 2011 Workplace Employment Relations Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Bryson, A. (2013a). Positive employee attitudes: How much human resource management do you need? Human Relations 66 (3), 385–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Bryson, A. (2013b). Not So Dissatisfied After All? The Impact of Union Coverage on Job Satisfaction, NIESR Discussion Paper No. 412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S., & Bryson, A. (Eds.). (2009). High involvement management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bryson, A., Erhel, C., Salibekyan, Z. (2016). Job Quality. In: Amossé, T., Bryson, A., Forth, J., Petit, H. (eds) Comparative Workplace Employment Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57419-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics