Abstract
The social support provided by host country nationals (HCNs) has been identified as an important source of successful expatriation. However, the roles of different HCN actors have not yet been sufficiently differentiated in this process. Drawing on social support theory and conservation of resources theory, this chapter aims to fill this void by investigating the impact of social support provided by five groups of HCN actors on expatriates’ cross-cultural adjustment: HCN top management team members, supervisors, colleagues, and subordinates in the work domain, as well as friends in the non-work domain. The resulting model suggests that all these HCN actors can increase expatriates’ adjustment; however, colleagues in the work domain and friends in the non-work domain have the highest influence on all types of adjustments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, B. A. (2005). Expatriate selection: Good management or good luck? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(4), 567–583.
Arman, G., & Aycan, Z. (2013). Host country nationals’ attitudes toward expatriates: Development of a measure. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(15), 2927–2947.
Bader, B. (2015). The power of support in high-risk countries: Compensation and social support as antecedents of expatriate work attitudes. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(13), 1712–1736.
Bader, B., Berg, N., Holtbrügge, D. (2015). Expatriate performance in terrorism-endangered countries: The role of family and organizational support. International Business Review. Online before print. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.03.005
Bader, B., & Schuster, T. (2015). Expatriate social networks in terrorism-endangered countries: An empirical analysis in Afghanistan, India, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia. Journal of International Management, 21(1), 63–77.
Black, J. S., & Gregersen, H. B. (1991). Antecedents to cross-cultural adjustment for expatriates in Pacific rim assignments. Human Relations, 44(5), 497–515.
Black, J. S., Mendenhall, M., & Oddou, G. (1991). Toward acomprehensive model of international adjustment an integration of multiple theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 291–317.
Black, J. S., & Stephens, G. K. (1989). The influence of the spouse on American expatriate adjustment and intent to stay in Pacific rim overseas assignments. Journal of Management, 15(4), 529.
Bonache, J., Sanchez, J. I., & Zárraga-Oberty, C. (2009). The interaction of expatriate pay differential and expatriate inputs on host country nationals’ pay unfairness. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(10), 2135–2149.
Caligiuri, P. M. (2000a). Selecting expatriates for personality characteristics: A moderating effect of personality on the relationship between host national contact and cross-cultural adjustment. Management International Review, 40(1), 61–80.
Caligiuri, P. M. (2000b). The big five personality characteristics as predictors of expatriate’s desire to terminate the assignment and supervisor-reated performance. Personnel Psychology, 53(1), 67–88.
Caligiuri, P. M., & Cascio, W. F. (1998). Can we send her there? maximizing the success of western women on global assignments. Journal of World Business, 33(4), 394.
Caligiuri, P., & Lazarova, M. (2002). A model for the influence of social interaction and social support on female expatriates’ cross-cultural adjustment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(5), 761–772.
Carraher, S. M., Sullivan, S. E., & Crocitto, M. M. (2008). Mentoring across global boundaries: An empirical examination of home- and host-country mentors on expatriate career outcomes. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(8), 1310–1326.
Chang, Y.-Y., Gong, Y., & Peng, M. W. (2012). Expatriate knowledge transfer, subsidiary absortive capacity, and subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 927–948.
Davies, S., Kraeh, A., & Froese, F. J. (2015). Burden or support? The influence of partner nationality on expatriate cross-cultural adjustment. Journal of Global Mobility, 3(2), 169–182.
Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 565–573.
Farh, C. I., Bartol, K. M., Shaprio, D., & Shin, J. (2010a). Networking abroad: A process model of how expatriates from support ties to facilitate adjustment. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 434–454.
Florkowski, G. W., & Fogel, D. S. (1999). Expatriate adjustment and commitment: The role of host-unit treatment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(5), 783–807.
Frese, M., & Semmer, N. (1991). Stressfolgen in Abhängigkeit von Moderatorvariablen: Der Einfluß von Kontrolle und sozialer Unterstützung [Stress consequences in dependence of moderator variables: The influence of control and social support]. In S. Greif, E. Bamber, & N. Semmer (Eds.), Psychischer Stress am Arbeitsplatz [Psychological Stress at Work] (pp. 135–153). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
Gong, Y. (2003). Subsidiary staffing in multinational enterprises: Agency, resources, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 728–739.
Gong, Y. (2006). The impact of subsidiary top management team national diversity on subsidiary performance: Knowledge and legitimacy perspectives. Management International Review, 46(6), 771–789.
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1988). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96–107.
Harzing, A.-W. (2001). Of bears, bumble-bees, and spiders: The role of expatriates in controlling foreign subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 36(4), 366.
Haslberger, A., Brewster, C., & Hippler, T. (2013). The dimensions of expatriate adjustment. Human Resource Management, 52(3), 333–351.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989a). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
Hocking, J. B., Brown, M., & Harzing, A.-W. (2007). Balancing global and local strategic contexts: Expatriate knowledge transfer, applications, and learning within a transnational organization. Human Resource Management, 46(4), 513–533.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2001). Social identity processes in organizational contexts. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Holopainen, J., & Björkman, I. (2005). The personal characteristics of the successful expatriate: A critical review of the literature and an empirical investigation. Personnel Review, 34(1), 37–50.
House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Sociological Forum. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Klein, H. J., & Polin, B. (2012). Are organizations on board with best practices onboarding? In C. R. Wanberg (Ed.), The oxford handbook of organiaztional socialization (pp. 267–287). New York: Oxford University Press.
Louis, M. R., Posner, B. Z., & Powell, G. N. (1983). The availability and help-fullness of socialization practices. Personnel Psychology, 36(4), 857–866.
Maertz Jr., C. P., Griffeth, R. W., Campbell, N. S., & Allen, D. G. (2007). The effects of perceived organizational support and perceived supervisor support on employee turnover. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(8), 1059–1075.
Mahajan, A. (2011). Host country national’s reactions to expatriate pay policies: Making a case for a cultural alignment pay model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(1), 121–137.
Mahajan, A., & Toh, S. M. (2014). Facilitating expatriate adjustment: The role of advice-seeking from host country nationals. Journal of World Business, 49(4), 476–487.
Mäkelä, K., & Suutari, V. (2009). Global careers: A social capital paradox. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(5), 992–1008.
Malek, M. A., Budhwar, P., & Reiche, B. S. (2015). Sources of support and expatriation: A multiple stakeholder perspective of expatriate adjustment and performance in Malaysia. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(2), 258–276.
Massingham, P. (2010). Managing knowledge transfer between parent country nationals (Australia) and host country nationals (Asia). The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(9), 1414–1435.
Mendenhall, M., & Oddou, G. (1985). The dimensions of expatriate acculturation: A review. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 39–47.
Mezias, J. M., & Scandura, T. A. (2005). A needs-driven approach to expatriate adjustment and career development: A multiple mentoring perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(5), 519–538.
Naumann, E. (1992). A conceptual model of expatriate turnover. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(3), 499–531.
Ng, T. W. H., & Sorensen, K. L. (2008). Toward a further understanding of the relationships between perceptions of support and work attitudes: A meta-analysis. Group & Organization Management, 33(3), 243–268.
Norifumi, K., & Mohr, A. (2015). The contingent effects of role ambiguity and role novelty on expatriates’ work-related outcomes. British Journal of Management, 26(2), 163–181.
Oltra, V., Bonache, J., & Brewster, C. (2013). A new framework for understanding inequalities between expatriates and host country nationals. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(2), 291–310.
Pahl, R. E. (2000). On friendship. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Paik, Y., Segaud, B., & Malinowski, C. (2002). How to improve repatriation management. International Journal of Manpower, 23(7), 635–648.
Peltokorpi, V. (2008). Cross-cultural adjustment of expatriates in Japan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(9), 1588–1606.
Peltokorpi, V., & Froese, F. J. (2012). The impact of expatriate personality traits on cross-cultural adjustment: A study with expatriates in Japan. International Business Review, 21(4), 734–746.
Peltokorpi, V., & Froese, F. (2014). Expatriate personality and cultural fit: The moderating role of host country context on job satisfaction. International Business Review, 23(1), 293–302.
Pettinger, L. (2005). Friends, relations and colleagues: The blurred boundaries of the workplace. The Sociological Review, 53(S2), 37–55.
Pichler, S., Varma, A., & Budhwar, P. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of the social categorization of expatriates in India. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(5), 915–927.
Reiche, B. S., Harzing, A.-W., & Kraimer, M. L. (2008). The role of international assignees’ social capital in creating inter-unit intellectual capital: A cross-level model. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3), 509–526.
RES Forum. (2015). RES Forum Annual Report 2015. London.
Rollag, K., Parise, S., & Cross, R. (2005). Getting new hires up to speed quickly. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(2), 35–41.
Scandura, T. A., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1994). Leader-member exchange and supervisor career mentoring as complementary constructs in leadership research. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1588–1602.
Selmer, J. (2001). Expatriate selection: Back to basics? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12(8), 1219–1233.
Shen, Y., & Kram, K. E. (2011). Expatriates’ developmental networks: Network diversity, base, and support functions. Career Development International, 16(6), 528–552.
Solomon, C. M. (1995). Global compensation: Learn the ABCs. Personnel Journal, 74(7), 70–75.
Stinglhamber, F., & Vandenberghe, C. (2003). Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(3), 251–270.
Stroppa, C., & Spieß, E. (2010). Expatriates social networks: The role of company size. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(13), 2306–2322.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Takeuchi, R. (2010). A critical review of expatriate adjustment research through a multiple stakeholder view: Progress, emerging trends and prospects. Journal of Management, 36(4), 1040–1064.
Takeuchi, R., Lepak, D. P., Marinova, S. V., & Yun, S. (2007). Nonlinear influences of stressors on general adjustment: The case of Japanese expatriates and their spouses. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 928–943.
Takeuchi, R., Yun, S., & Tesluk, P. E. (2002). An examination of crossover and spillover effects of spousal and expatriate cross-cultural adjustment on expatriate outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 655–666.
Templer, K. J. (2010). Personal attributes of expatriate managers, subordinate ethnocentrism, and expatriate success: A host-country perspective. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(10), 1754–1768.
Toh, S. M., & DeNisi, A. S. (2003). Host country national reactions to expatriate pay policy: A model and implications. Academy of Management Review, 28(4), 606–621.
Toh, S. M., & DeNisi, A. S. (2005). A local perspective to expatriate success. Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 132–146.
Toh, S. M., & DeNisi, A. S. (2007). Host country nationals as socializing agents: A social identity approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(3), 281–301.
Toh, S. M., & Srinivas, E. S. (2012). Perceptions of task cohesiveness and organizational support increase trust and information sharing between host country nationals and expatriate co-workers in Oman. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 696–705.
Tung, R. (1988). Career issues in international assignments. The Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 241–244.
Vance, C. M., & McNulty, Y. (2014). Why and how women and men acquire expatriate career development experience: A study of American expatriates in Europe. International Studies of Management and Organization, 44(2), 1–34.
Vance, C. M., Vaiman, V., & Andersen, T. (2009). The vital liaison role of host country nationals in MNC knowledge management. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 649–659.
Varma, A., Budhwar, P., & Pichler, S. (2011a). Chinese host country nationals’ willingness to help expatriates: The role of social categorization. Thunderbird International Business Review, 53(3), 353–364.
Varma, A., Pichler, S., & Budhwar, P. (2011b). The relationship between expatriate job level and host country national categorization: An investigation in the UK. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(1), 103–120.
Zander, U., Zander, L., Gaffney, S., & Olsson, J. (2010). Intersectionality as a new perspective in international business research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(4), 457–466.
NAP References
Farh, C. I., Bartol, K. M., Shapiro, D. L., & Shin, J. (2010b). Networking abroad: A process model of how expatriates form support ties to facilitate adjustment. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 434–454.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989b). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
Kraimer, M. L., Wayne, S. J., & Jaworski, R. A. A. (2001). Sources of support and expatriate performance: The mediating role of expatriate adjustment. Personnel Psychology, 54(1), 71–99.
Reiche, B. S. (2012). Knowledge benefits of social capital upon repatriation: A longitudinal study of international assignees. Journal of Management Studies, 49(6), 1052–1077.
Wanberg, C. (Ed.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of organizational socialization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
North American Perspective
North American Perspective
The Effect of Host Country Nationals’ Social Support on Expatriates’ Adjustment—A Multiple Stakeholder Approach
Anna Katharina Bader has presented an examination of the multiple host country nationals’ (HCNs) sources of social support whom expatriates may benefit from. Her chapter recognizes and differentiates HCNs by job categories and relative job position to the expatriate assignee in question. Specifically, she proposes that research should consider five groups of HCNs: top management team (TMT) members, supervisors, colleagues, subordinates, and friends. Using COR theory (Hobfoll, 1989b), Bader effectively argues that prior to arriving at the host location, expatriates possessed a set of social resources in the home country that could also be distinguished into these five categories. With the relocation, these resources are, to some degree, lost, and thus require replacing potentially through host country relationships. Although the stress perspective has heavily influenced early research on expatriate adjustment (e.g., Kraimer, Wayne, & Jaworski, 2001) and brought about the notion of adjustment among expatriates as they coped with the stressors of the assignment, this idea of matching and replacing resources with host national sources is a new and potentially fruitful way of thinking about social support for expatriate newcomers.
The most promising category highlighted in Bader’s model is the host country TMT. This has, in my opinion, been the most overlooked category of support and largely assumed to not play a significant part in the success of the expatriate. Bader has initiated a conversation that is important to have in future work regarding the potentially critical role this category of HCNs may have. The shape and form in which this support would be most meaningful for the expatriate still requires further study and elaboration. Many questions remain to be explored: Can the home country TMT be truly substituted with the host country TMT? Is it merely a replacement or an enhancement? Could there also be long-term benefits that extend beyond the expatriate assignment at the host location, and if so, what would they be? One also wonders what might happen to expatriate adjustment if HCN TMT member(s) demonstrates one of the categories of social support outside of informational and instrumental support? Would this then have an extraordinary impact on adjustment simply because it is not expected yet originating from a high-status source? It would seem that a kind word of encouragement, or a recommendation for a restaurant from a TMT member could potentially have quite a different influence on the expatriate than if they came from a coworker or subordinate. Or is it the case that the source and status level of the originator of the support are not important, as long as the needed support is made available? And finally, what would be the role of the HCN TMT if the expatriates were assigned to join the ranks of the TMT—how would this affect its impact and the impact of the other sources of HCN support?
Following along these lines of theorizing, it is clear that much remains to be researched and understood in the realm of HCN roles in the expatriate socialization process, as well as post-assignment (e.g., Reiche, 2012). While it is useful to think about HCNs with these broad categorizations, it is also important to be mindful that members in each of these categories are not homogenous and may vary in their approach in providing or withholding support. While thinking about positive relations, it is also necessary to consider adverse relations that may occur from within the same category or in other categories, and whether the presence of such relations could be so devastating that sources of support elsewhere may not buffer the expatriate from its harmful effect.
The field should also continue to see adjustment as a two-way process—not losing sight of the proactive role that expatriates can and should play. Expatriate newcomers are not only passive recipients of social support, but can also be authors of their own support networks. The most obvious people to approach for support may not always be the ones with the support the expatriate truly needs at the time (Farh, Bartol, Shapiro, & Shin, 2010b). By the same token, just because social support is provided, it may not be accepted, or actually useful and viewed as such. Social support, when the target is not ready to receive, can be counterproductive and even resented by the targets of the support. The literature should continue to draw on the significant advancements made in the socialization literature to understand the dynamic relationship between the newcomer and the organizational insiders (for a recent review, see Wanberg, 2012). The proactive seeking of support by the expatriate, the timing of help, or the “invisibility” of help received are potential ways in which the ideas generated in this chapter could expand on to consider the functionality of social support in expatriate adjustment. Also, it cannot be assumed that the mere presence of social support from these sources would be adaptive.
Finally, the field of expatriate management as whole should continue to push the envelope in understanding expatriate and HCN outcomes beyond expatriate adjustment, and the ways in which these employees may interact such that all parties involved, including the organizations, institutions, and societies implicated in the exercise. Anna Katharina Bader’s chapter is an important step in this direction.
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bader, A.K. (2017). The Effect of Host Country Nationals’ Social Support on Expatriates’ Adjustment—A Multiple Stakeholder Approach. In: Bader, B., Schuster, T., Bader, A. (eds) Expatriate Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57406-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57406-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57405-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57406-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)