Skip to main content

Regional Organizations, Conflict Resolution and Mediation in South America

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Power Dynamics and Regional Security in Latin America

Abstract

This chapter approaches regional conflict resolution and mediation in South America, focusing on the role regional organizations and arrangements have played as social spaces where shared meanings and collective representations of peace and security are produced, contested and (re)negotiated. In the case of South America, the images that constitute the regional experience in conflict resolution are (a) a plural institutional architecture; (b) a legalist framework with strong preference for non-interventionism and peaceful conflict resolution; (c) a separation between domestic violence and international peace; and (d) ad hoc arrangements based on presidential involvement. These four images are part of public life, constituting a particular symbolic frame developed by the local elites and reproduced through decision-making practices on peace and conflict in the region.

We would like to thank CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development), FAPERJ (Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for support of Research of the State of Rio de Janeiro) and the Embassy of Norway for their support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term ‘conflict resolution’ is commonly used to refer both to the process (or the intention) of changing the violent behavior and hostile attitudes of parties in conflict and to the completion of a process of peaceful change, including addressing the deep-rooted sources of a conflict (Ramsbotham et al. 2011: 31). In this chapter, ‘conflict resolution’ refers to institutional mechanisms created to resolve disputes peacefully, such as via negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and so on.

  2. 2.

    For this concept and discussion, see Onuf (1989).

  3. 3.

    The South American Regional Integration Initiative, created in late 2000 with the participation of the 12 countries of South America, seeks the physical interconnection of the region, energy integration and changes to legislation, rules and national regulations that hinder commerce and investment.

  4. 4.

    In 1994, 34 countries in the Western hemisphere agreed to construct a Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA), but by 2005 it became clear the project would not come to fruition. Also in 1994 Canada, Mexico and the United States signed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), creating a trilateral trade bloc in North America.

  5. 5.

    The relation between Colombia and the United States is an exception since these countries have developed a strategic partnership based on a narrative of cooperation and assistance (see the chapter by Cepeda and Tickner in this volume).

  6. 6.

    Its initial name was Andean Pact; it was renamed Andean Community in 1996.

  7. 7.

    It was initially called ‘Alternative’ instead of ‘Alliance’, but the name was changed on 24 June 2009.

  8. 8.

    Since its founding in Cuba in 2004, ALBA has grown from two to eleven members: Antigua and Barbuda, Bolivia, Cuba, Dominica, Ecuador, Grenada, Nicaragua, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and Venezuela.

  9. 9.

    ALBA members have expressed their desire to establish a military component as part of the counter-hegemonic agenda of the bloc. During the seventh ALBA Summit in Bolivia (2009) a mutual defense pact was discussed and, although this pact has not evolved, a Regional Defense School was established in Santa Cruz, Bolivia.

  10. 10.

    Understood as a traditional foreign policy image conceived regionally and related to the respect for international normative frameworks. Jurisdicismo also refers to a political argument commonly used as a reference for the definition and evaluation of foreign policy discourses and practices in the region.

  11. 11.

    See the Organization of American States’ webpage on the Peace Fund, available at http://www.oas.org/sap/peacefund/peacefund/ (28 June 2015).

  12. 12.

    In the case of MERCOSUR the Ushuaia Protocol of 1998 established the connection between the integration process and the existence of democratic institutions (Ribeiro Hoffmann 2005), and also stipulated that any rupture in the member-states’ democratic system would be submitted to due procedures, from diplomatic consultations to sanctions. The Montevideo Protocol of 2011 includes additional possibilities of sanctions in the case of democratic rupture in a member states. On regional democracy clauses, also see the chapter by Weiffen in this volume.

  13. 13.

    See Uppsala Conflict Data Program, 2008, available at http://www.pcr.uu.se/research/UCDP/graphs/charts_and_graphs.htm (2 July 2015).

  14. 14.

    For an alternative view see Mares (2001) and the chapter by Mares in this book.

  15. 15.

    Political Declaration of MERCOSUR, Bolivia and Chile as a Zone of Peace, available at http://www.state.gov/p/wha/rls/70988.htm (28 June 2015).

  16. 16.

    OAS, ‘A History of Peace Initiatives in the Americas’, available at https://www.oas.org/sap/peacefund/publications/Peace_Initiatives_in_the_Americas.pdf (28 June 2015).

  17. 17.

    Refer to the record of the Foreign Ministers’ conference, available at http://www.comunidadandina.org/documentos/actas/compromiso_lima.htm (2 July 2015).

  18. 18.

    Colombia, Bolivia, Cuba, Nicaragua, Colombia, Peru, El Salvador, Guatemala, Dominican Republic, Argentina, Chile and Haiti.

  19. 19.

    Number of homicides per 100,000 inhabitants, according to Instituto Igarapé’s Homicide Monitor, available at http://homicide.igarape.org.br (5 November 2015).

  20. 20.

    UNODC Global Study on Homicide, available at https://www.unodc.org/gsh/ (2 July 2015).

  21. 21.

    Recent efforts to add non-traditional conflicts in accounts on conflict resolution include Fuentes and Fuentes (2004) in an attempt to look at conflict resolution efforts through the concept of Latin American ‘vulnerabilities’; a compilation organized by the School for Conflict Resolution and Analysis at George Mason University in partnership with the University for Peace (Pfund 2014); and the works of organizations such as Conciliation Resources, the Regional Coordination for Economic and Social Research (CRIES) and the Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre (NOREF).

  22. 22.

    Colombia shares a 1,367 mile border with Venezuela, approximately 1,000 miles each with Peru and Brazil, and smaller borders with Ecuador and Panama.

  23. 23.

    Another example for ad hoc initiatives is the group of friendly states to the peace talks in Colombia – Costa Rica, Mexico, Spain and Venezuela.

  24. 24.

    Heads of state have met to define the economic, political and security agendas for cooperation in the hemisphere. After the first Summit of the Americas, the event was also organized in 1998, 2001, 2005, 2009, 2012 and 2015. The Summit Implementation Review Group is the core management body of the Summit Process.

References

  • Barnett, Michael, and Raymond Duvall. 2005. Power in International Politics. International Organization 59(1): 39–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglino, Jorge. 2012. Defence in a Post Hegemonic Regional Agenda: The Case of the South American Defence Council. In The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America, ed. Pia Riggirozzi and Diana Tussie, 81–100. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Battaglino, Jorge. 2015. Democracia, reconfiguración de amenazas y la paz sudamericana. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 51: 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, Anna-Karina. 2013. Peace Processes in Colombia: International Third-Party Interventions, Peace, Conflict & Development 20. http://www.bradford.ac.uk/social-sciences/peace-conflict-and-development/issue-20/Iss-20-Art-16-Final.pdf. Accessed 16 February 2016.

  • Briceño Ruiz, José. 2014. El ALBA: Una discusión de su modelo, sus resultados y sus perspectivas. In ¿Atlántico vs. Pacífico?: América Latina y el Caribe, los cambios regionales y los desafíos globales. Anuario de la Integración Regional de América Latina y el Caribe, No. 10, 2014, ed. Andrés Serbin, Laneydi Martínez, and Haroldo Ramanzini Júnior, 151–178. Buenos Aires: Coordinadora Regional de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales – CRIES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1998. The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centeno, Miguel Angel. 2002. Blood and Debt: War and the Nation-State in Latin America. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Andrew, and Thomas Legler. 2006. Intervention without Intervening? The OAS Defense and Promotion of Democracy in the Americas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dario, Diogo Monteiro. 2014. Peace Talks Between the FARC and Santos Government in Colombia. Rio de Janeiro: BRICS Policy Center, Policy Brief 4(2): 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamint, Rut. 2013. Regionalismo y Posicionamiento Suramericano: UNASUR y ALBA. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals 101: 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domingues, José M. 2013. Imaginário e política na modernidade: A trajetória do peronismo, Rio de Janeiro: Núcleo de Estudos de Teoria Social e América Latina. Cadernos De Trabalho NETSAL 1(2): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez, Jorge I. et al. 2003. Boundary Disputes in Latin America. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, Peaceworks no. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, Martha. 1996. Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism. International Organization 50(2): 325–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flemes, Daniel, Detlef Nolte, and Leslie Wehner. 2011. Una Comunidad de Seguridad Regional en Formación: La Unasur y su Consejo de Defensa. Estudios Internacionales 170: 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes Julio, Claudia, and Claudio Fuentes Saavedra. 2004. Vulnerabilidades de una región pacífica: América Latina a comienzos del siglo XXI. Europa América Latina: Análisis e Informaciones No. 16 Rio de Janeiro: Fundación Konrad Adenauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvão, Thiago G. 2009. América do Sul: Construção pela reinvenção (2000–2008). Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 52(2): 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, David, and Diego Azzi. 2006. ALBA: Venezuela’s Answer to ‘Free Trade’: The Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas, Focus on the Global South, Occasional Paper 3. http://www.focusweb.org/node/1087. Accessed 29 June 2015.

  • Heine, Jorge. 2006. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Latin America and Multilateralism after 9/11. In Multilateralism Under Challenge: Power, International Order, and Structural Change, ed. Edward Newman, Ramesh Thakur, and John Tirman, 481–503. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, Monica. 2010. Concepts of Security in South America. International Peacekeeping 17(5): 598–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herz, Monica. 2011. The Organization of American States (OAS): Global Governance Away From the Media. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, Monica. 2014. Regional Governance. In International Organization and Global Governance, ed. Thomas Weiss and Rorden Wilkinson, 236–25. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, Monica, and João P. Nogueira. 2005. Ecuador vs. Peru: Peacemaking amid Rivalry. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, Monica. 2003. Los Claroscuros de la Seguridad Regional en Las Américas. Nueva Sociedad 185: 93–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, Andrew. 1998. An Emerging Security Community in South America?. In Security Communities, ed. Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett, 228–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kacowicz, Arie M. 2000. Stable Peace among Nations. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudy, Mark. 2000. The Vatican Mediation of the Beagle Channel Dispute: Crisis Intervention and Forum Building. In Words Over War: Mediation and Arbitration to Prevent Deadly Conflict, ed. Melanie Greenberg, John Barton, and Margaret McGuinness, 293–320. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares, David R. 2001. Violent Peace: Militarized Interstate Bargaining in Latin America. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Benjamin. 2007. States, Nations, and the Great Powers: The Sources of Regional War and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. 1994. A Region-Building Approach to Northern Europe. Review of International Studies 20(1): 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Iver B. 2003. A Region-Building Approach. In Theories of New Regionalisms: A Palgrave Reader, ed. Fredrik Söderbaum and Timothy Shaw, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelsner, A. 2003. Two Sides of the Same Coin: Mutual Perceptions and Security Community in the Case of Argentina and Brazil. In Comparative Regional Integration: Theoretical Perspectives, ed. F. Laursen, 185–206. Ashgate: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onuf, Nicholas. 1989. World of Our Making. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paasi, Anssi. 1986. The Institutionalization of Regions: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Emergence of Regions and the Constitution of Regional Identity. Fennia. International Journal of Geography 164(1): 105–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfund, Alicia. ed. 2014. Experiencias Latinoamericanas en el Abordaje de Conflictos. San José [Costa Rica]: Universidad para la Paz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, Michael. 2003. The United Nation and Regional Security. Europe and Beyond, ed. Waheguru Pal Singh Sidhu. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsbotham, Oliver, Tom Woodhouse, and Hugh Miall. 2011. Contemporary Conflict Resolution: The Prevention, Management and Transformation of Deadly Conflicts. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro Hoffmann, Andrea. 2005. Avaliando a influência das organizações regionais de integração sobre o caráter democrático dos regimes de seus Estados-Partes: O caso do Mercosul e o Paraguai. Cena Internacional 7(2): 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas Aravena, Francisco. 2000. Multilateralismo: Perspectivas latinoamericanas. Santiago, Chile: FLACSO-Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanahuja, José Antonio. 2014. Enfoques Diferenciados y marcos comunes en el regionalismo latinoamericano: Alcance y perspectivas de UNASUR y CELAC. Pensamiento Propio 39: 75–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, Rodrigo. 2014. Security in South America: The Role of States and Regional Organizations. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner/First Forum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viana, Manuela T. 2009. A dimensão internacional do conflito armado colombiano: A internacionalização dos processos de paz segundo as agendas hemisférica e global, Master Dissertation, University of São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiffen, Brigitte, Leslie Wehner, and Detlef Nolte. 2013. Overlapping Regional Security Institutions in South America: The Case of OAS and UNASUR. International Area Studies Review 16(4): 370–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Thomas G. 1998. Beyond UN Sub-Contracting: Task-Sharing with Regional Security Arrangements and Service-Providing NGOs. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Herz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Herz, M., Siman, M., Telles, A.C. (2017). Regional Organizations, Conflict Resolution and Mediation in South America. In: Suarez, M., Villa, R., Weiffen, B. (eds) Power Dynamics and Regional Security in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57382-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics