Skip to main content

The Brazilian Place Equality Regime

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inequality and Governance in the Metropolis

Part of the book series: Comparative Territorial Politics ((COMPTPOL))

  • 365 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the Brazilian regime of place equality, in which municipalities are fully in charge of social service provision. The analysis outlines national policies toward place equality and their effects on revenue and spending inequality among Brazilian municipalities in general as well as in five selected metropolitan regions. The chapter demonstrates that, although local governments possess an important role in the delivery of public policies in Brazil, as well as constitutionally protected local autonomy, local policies are implemented under moderate central government supervision. Shared revenues and conditional federal transfers sharply diminish the disparities among municipalities in their capacity to fund their own policies through self-generated revenues. Despite this effect from the Brazilian place equality regime, however, inequality among municipalities persists.

The research on which this chapter was based has been supported by the Fundação de Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) to the Center for Metropolitan Studies. The author thanks Edgard Fusaro, Patrick Silva, and Paulo Loyola for their helpful research assistance. Several meetings of the International Metropolitan Observatory greatly contributed to frame this chapter. I am particularly grateful to comments by Jefferey Sellers, Daniel Kübler, Eran Razin, Fred Lazin, Vincent Hoffman-Martinot, Alan Walks, Tomáš Kostelecký, and Charles Jeffery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afonso, Jose R.R., and Erika Araújo. 2006. Local Government Organization and Finance: Brazil. In Local Governance in Developing Countries, ed. Anwar Shah. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arretche, Marta. 2005. Quem taxa e quem gasta: a barganha federativa na federação brasileira. Revista de Sociologia e Política 24: 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. The Veto Power of Territorial Governments in Brazil: Political Institutions and Representatives Voting Behaviour. Brazilian Political Science Review 2: 40–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Federalism and Territorial Equality: A Contradiction in Terms. Dados 5: 587–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Federalism, Social Policy, and Reductions in Territorial Inequality in Contemporary Brazil. In New Order and Progress: Development and Democracy in Brazil, ed. Ben Ross Schneider, 162–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banting, Keith (2006). Social Citizenship and Federalism: Is a Federal State a contradiction in terms?”, in: Greer, Scott (ed.) (2006). Territory, Democracy, and Justice. Regionalism and Federalism in Western Democracies. London: Pallgrave Macmillan. P. 44–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, José Murilo. 2001. Cidadania no Brasil. São Paulo: Civilização Brasileira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, José Marcos P. 2015. A migração interna no Brasil nos últimos 50 anos: (des)continuidades e rupturas. In Trajetórias das Desigualdades: como o Brasil mudou nos últimos cinquenta anos, ed. Marta Arretche, 309–334. Editora Unesp: São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denters, Bruno, and G. Sterkenburg. 2007. The Governance and Spatial Inequalities in Metropolitan Areas in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the Stuttgart Meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gösta. 1985. Politics Against Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, Scott (ed.) (2006). Territory, Democracy, and Justice. Regionalism and Federalism in Western Democracies. London: Pallgrave Macmillan. P. 44–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann-Martinot, Vincent, and Jefferey Sellers, eds. 2007. Politique et métropole. Une comparaison internationale. Paris: CNRS Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2005. Research on the Municipalities Information. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/perfilmunic/.

  • Kübler, Daniel. 2005. Démocratie et gouvernance d’agglomération: quelques leçons européennes. Pouvoirs locaux 65(II): 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manow, Philippe. 2005. Germany: Co-Operative Federalism and the Overgrazing of the Fiscal Commons. In Federalism and the Welfare State. New World and European Experiences, eds. Obinger Herbert, S. Leibfried, and Francis Castles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mota, Carlos Guilherme, ed. 1982. Brasil em Perspectiva, Vol. 1. São Paulo: DIFEL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obinger, Herbert. 2005. Austria: Strong Parties in a Weak Federal Polity. In Federalism and the Welfare State. New World and European Experiences, eds. Obinger Herbert, S. Leibfried, and Francis Castles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Obinger, Herbert, S. Leibfried, and Francis Castles, eds. 2005. Federalism and the Welfare State. New World and European Experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, Fabricio. 2001. FUNDEF e Saúde: duas experiências (virtuosas?) de descentralização. Research report. Project: Fiscal Decentralization and Intergovernmental Financial Cooperation. Brasília: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Razin, Eran. 2007. Introduction: Deconcentration of Economic Activities Within Metropolitan Regions: A Qualitative Framework for Cross-National Comparison. In Employment Deconcentration in European Metropolitan Areas, eds. Eran Razin, Martin Dijst, and Carmen Vázquez. London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, Jonathan. 2004. Comparative Federalism and Decentralization: On Meaning and Measurement. Comparative Politics 36(4): 481–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, Jefferey, and A. Lidström. 2007. Decentralization, Local Government, and the Welfare State. Governance 20(4): 609–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, Anwar, ed. 2006. Local Governance in Developing Countries. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegarescu, Dan. 2005. Public Sector Decentralisation: Measurement Concepts and Recent International Trends. Fiscal Studies 26(3): 301–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souza, Celina. 2003. Brazils System of Local Government, Local Finance, and Intergovernmental Relations. Paper prepared for the research project Building Municipal Capacity for Finance Budgeting. School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazquez, Daniel Arias. 2003. Educação, Descentralização e Desequilíbrios Regionais: os impactos do FUNDEF. PhD Dissertation, Instituto de Economia da UNICAMP.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arretche, M. (2017). The Brazilian Place Equality Regime. In: Sellers, J., Arretche, M., Kübler, D., Razin, E. (eds) Inequality and Governance in the Metropolis. Comparative Territorial Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57378-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics