Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Researching a Posthuman World pp 23–56Cite as

Attending to Objects, Attuning to Things

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1308 Accesses

Abstract

We present our first four heuristics for interviewing objects: gathering anecdotes, following the actors, listening for the invitational quality of things, and studying breakdowns, accidents, and anomalies. These heuristics focus on attuning the reader to the objects and things of practice, and on gathering the kinds of qualitative material needed for further posthuman reflection and analysis. Each heuristic begins with suggested object interview questions and is followed by an in-depth description of the heuristic’s theoretical underpinnings, practical applications, and examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, C. (2010). Teachers building dwelling thinking with slideware. The Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 10(2), 1–12. doi: 10.2989/IPJP.2010.10.1.3.1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. (2016). Programming the gesture of writing: On the algorithmic paratexts of the digital. Educational Theory, 66(4), 479–497. doi:10.1111/edth.12184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C. (2017). Technology’s hidden curriculum and the new digital pharmakon. In J. Jagodzinski (Ed.), The precarious future of education: Risk and uncertainty in ecology, curriculum, learning, and technology. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave MacMillan. [forthcoming]

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C., & Yin, Y. (2014). Undergraduate students’ experiences of time in a MOOC: A term of Dino 101. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age (CELDA) (pp. 225–230). Lisbon, Portugal: International Association for the Development of the Information Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, B., & Blaise, M. (2013). There’s something in the air: Becoming-with research practices. Cultural Studies—Critical Methodologies, 13(4), 240– 245. doi: 10.1177/1532708613487867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benso, S. (2000). The face of things: A different side of ethics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, A. (2005). Shadowing software and clinical records: On the ethnography of nonhumans and heterogeneous contexts. Organization, 12(3), 357–378. doi:10.1177/1350508405051272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, S., Ironside, P., Spence, D., Smythe, L. (2016). Crafting stories in hermeneutic phenomenology research: A methodological device. Qualitative Health Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1049732316656161

    Google Scholar 

  • Decuypere, M., & Simons, M. (2016). What screens do: The role(s) of the screen in academic work. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 132–151. doi: 10.1177/1474904115610335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T. (2014a). Knowledge circulations in inter-para/professional practice: A sociomaterial inquiry. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 66(3), 264–280. doi: 10.1080/13636820.2014.917695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flusser, V. (1999). The shape of things: A philosophy of design. London: Reaktion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.G. (1976). Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourlay, L., & Oliver, M. (2017). Students’ physical and digital sites of study: Making, marking and breaking boundaries. In L. Carvalho, P. Goodyear, M. de Laat (Eds.), Place-based spaces for networked learning (pp. 73–89). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunkel, D., & Taylor, P.A. (2014). Heidegger and the media. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (trans: Macquarrie, J., & Robinson, E.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, language, and thought (trans: Hofstadter, A.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2012). Bremen and Freiburg lectures: Insight into that which is and basic principles of thinking (trans: Mitchell, A.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, J. (1982). Anima Mundi: The return of the soul to the world. Spring, 1982, 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschauer, S. (2006). Putting things into words. Ethnographic description and the silence of the social. Human Studies, 29(4), 413–441. doi: 10.1007/s10746-007-9041-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and praxis: A philosophy of technology. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1983). Existential technics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2012b). Toward an ecology of materials. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 427–442. doi: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Introna, L. D. (2016). Ethico-onto-epistemology: some reflections on performative epistemic practices. Paper presented at 4s/EASST Conference Barcelona 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Introna, L.D. (2009). Making sense of ICT, new media, and ethics. In C. Avgerou, R. Mansell, D. Quah, R. Silverstone, (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information and communication technologies. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548798.003.001

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In T.R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 175–188). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? A sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W.E. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1996). Aramis or the love of technology (trans: Porter, C.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2008). On sociology and STS. The Sociological Review 56(4), 623–649. doi:10.1111/j1467-954X.2009.01846.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2012). ANT and politics. Working in and on the world. http://www.sv.uio.no/sai/english/research/projects/newcomers/publications/working-papers-web/ant-and-politics.pdf

  • McLuhan, M. (1964/2003). Understanding media: The extensions of man (critical edition), ed., W. T. Gordon. Corte Madera: Ginko Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M., & McLuhan, E. (1988). Laws of media: The new science. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M., Hutchon, K., McLuhan, E. (1977). City as classroom: Understanding language and media. Agincourt, ON: Book Society of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M., Hutchon, K., McLuhan, E. (1978). Multi-media: The laws of the media. The English Journal, 67(8), 92–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible (trans: Lingis, A.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception (trans: A. Landes, Donald). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, M. (2000). Reconnecting culture, technology and nature: From society to heterogeneity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, M. (2004). On making data social: Heterogeneity in sociological practice. Qualitative Research, 4(1), 5–23. doi: 10.1177/1468794104041105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, M. (2012). Anecdote. In C. Lury, & N. Wakeford (Eds.), Inventive methods: The happening of the social (pp. 25–35). Abingdon, OX: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A.J. (2015). The fourfold: Reading the late Heidegger. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A. (2010). Actor-network theory: Sensitive terms and enduring tensions. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie and Sozialpsychologie, 50(1), 253–269. http://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.330874

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, D. (2012). Thinking teacher professional learning performatively: A socio-material account, Journal of Education and Work, 25(1), 121–139. doi:10.1080/13639080.2012.644910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, M.D. (2013). Turning around the question of ‘transfer’ in education: Tracing the sociomaterial. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(12), 1276–1289. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2013.763592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, B. (2010). In defense of things: Archeology and the ontology of objects. Plymouth: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (2005). Asian eels and global warming: A posthumanist perspective on society and the environment. Ethics & the Environment, 10(2), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickersgill, E. (2016). Removed. http://www.removed.social/

  • Richards, I.A. (1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. London: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röhl, T. (2015). Transsituating education: Educational artefacts in the classroom and beyond. In S. Bollig, M-S Honig, S. Neumann, C. Seele (Eds.), MultiPluriTrans in educational ethnography: Approaching the multimodality, plurality and translocality of educational realities (pp. 143–161). Beilefeld, Germany: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S.M. (2006). Topologies of the flesh: A multidimensional exploration of the lifeworld. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scolles, J. (personal communication, 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T.L. (2010). Assembly required: Self-employed workers’ informal work-learning in online communities. PhD diss., University of Alberta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, T.L. (2012a). I’m deleting as fast as I can: Negotiating learning practices in cyberspace. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(1), 91–110. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2012.649417

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, J.H. (1972). A different existence. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lennep, D.J. (1987). The psychology of driving a car. In J.J. Kockelmans (Ed.), Phenomenological psychology: The Dutch school (pp. 217–227). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (1989). By the light of anecdote. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 7, 232–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M.A. (2012). Looking into the neonatal isolette. Medical Humanities, 38(1), e4. doi:10.1136/medhum-2011-010061

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannini, P. (2015). Non-representational ethnography: New ways of animating lifeworlds. Cultural Geographies, 22(2), 317–327. doi: 10.1177/1474474014555657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Uexküll, J. (2010 [1934/1940]). A foray into the worlds of animals and humans; with, A theory of meaning (trans: O’Neil, J.D.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukas, M., & Kilminster, S. (2014). The doctor and the blue form: Learning professional responsibility. In T. Fenwick, & M. Nerland (Eds.), Reconceptualising professional learning: Sociomaterial knowledges, practices and responsibilities (pp. 38–51). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Secondary Education, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Catherine Adams

  2. The School of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom

    Terrie Lynn Thompson

Authors
  1. Catherine Adams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Terrie Lynn Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adams, C., Thompson, T.L. (2016). Attending to Objects, Attuning to Things. In: Researching a Posthuman World. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57162-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57162-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57161-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57162-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation