• Cecilia Lazzeretti


Museum Communication: A Hierarchic System of Interconnected Genres

Museum press releases have gone through a continuous enrichment of their content over time: despite the advent of new media, they seem far from decline. Evaluative language has characterised museum communication since the earlier press releases, dating from the 1950s. Conversely, promotional features have been acquired more recently, as a consequence of the financial turmoil faced by museums in the 1980s.

In light of the derivation of new museum genres from the press release model, press releases represent the base of the pyramidal system of museum genres, determining the existence of the others.

This study acknowledges the power of words in museum communication, which is of strategic importance to practitioners and researchers; it provides them with a future focus within the context of a new media that still place value on copywriting (i.e. Instagram), despite the prominence of images in contemporary communication.


Press Release Textual Component Lexical Variety Multiple Voice Textual Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  2. Forenski, T (2006). Die! Press release! Die! Die! Die!. Silicon Valley Watcher. Last Accessed 23 Dec 2015.
  3. Garzone, G. (2012). Why do genres change? In G. Garzone, P. Catenaccio, & C. Degano (Eds.), Genre change in the contemporary world. Short-term diachronic perspectives (pp. 21–40). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  4. Kidd, J. (2011). Enacting engagement online: Framing social media use for the museum. Information Technology & People, 24(11), 64.Google Scholar
  5. Lazzeretti, C. 2015. Exhibition Press Announcements: an evolving or dissolving genre? In Jacobs, G. /Alessi, G. M., The Ins and Outs of Researching Professional Discourse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Lazzeretti, C., & Bondi, M. (2012). ‘A hypnotic viewing experience’. Promotional purpose in the language of exhibition press announcements. Pragmatics, 22(4), 567–589.Google Scholar
  7. Tallon, L., & Walker, K. (Eds.). (2008). Digital technologies and the museum experience: Handheld guides and other media. Lanham: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar
  8. Miles, J. G. (2014). Instagram power: Build your brand and reach more customers with the power of pictures. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  9. Solis, B., & Breakenridge, D. K. (2009). Putting the public back in public relations. Upper Saddle River: FT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Strobbe, I., & Jacobs, G. (2005). E-releases: A view from linguistic pragmatics. Public Relations Review, 31, 289–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Weilenmann, A., Hillman, T., & Jungselius, B. (2013). Instagram at the museum: Communicating the museum experience through social photo sharing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. New York: ACM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecilia Lazzeretti
    • 1
  1. 1.Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly

Personalised recommendations