Collective Charisma, Selective Exclusion and National Belonging: ‘False’ and ‘Real’ Greeks from the Former Soviet Union

  • Manolis PratsinakisEmail author


This chapter explores the theoretical relevance of Elias and Scotson’s established-outsider model for the study of everyday nationhood. Based on an ethnography of the relationship between Greek immigrants from the former Soviet Union and native-born Greeks in a neighborhood in Thessaloniki, it shows how everyday practices marking the cultural difference between the two communities made native Greeks doubt the Greekness of the Soviet Greeks. The ‘false Greeks’ formed an imagined category figuring prominently in discussions by native residents about the immigrants in the neighbourhood. Through a selective attribution of ‘good characteristics’ to ‘true Greek’ immigrants and ‘bad characteristics’ to ‘false Greeks’, this category accommodated the negative attitudes of the natives about the certain Soviet Greeks without challenging official criteria of national belongingness. It also helped secure and reinforce dominant perceptions about the qualities of Greekness on which the native’s claimed collective charisma and dominant position vis-à-vis immigrants depended on.


  1. Antonsich, M. (2012). Exploring the demands of assimilation among white ethnic majorities in Western Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(1), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: SAGE publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. Bonikowski, B. (2016). Nationalism in settled times. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elias, N. (1978). What is sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Elias, N. (1994). The established and the outsiders: A sociological enquiry into community problems (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Elias, N., & Scotson, J. L. (1994). The established and the outsiders. London: Sage Publications Limited.Google Scholar
  7. Favell, A. (2003). Integration nations: The nation-state and research on immigrants in Western Europe. Comparative Social Research, 22, 13–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fox, J. E. (2007). From national inclusion to economic exclusion: Ethnic Hungarian labour migration to Hungary. Nations and Nationalism, 13(1), 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hage, G. (2000). White nation: Fantasies of white supremacy in a multicultural society (pbk). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Hess, C. (2008). The contested terrain of the parallel society: The other natives in contemporary Greece and Germany. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(9), 1519–1537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jenkins, R. (2011). Being Danish: Paradoxes of identity in everyday life. Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kokkinos, D. (1991). The Greek state’s overview of the Pontian issue. Journal of Refugee Studies, 4(4), 312–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mann, R. (2011). ‘It just feels English rather than multicultural’: Local interpretations of Englishness and non-Englishness. The Sociological Review, 59(1), 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Popov, A. (2010). Making sense of home and homeland: Former-Soviet Greeks’ motivations and strategies for a transnational migrant circuit. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pratsinakis, E. (2013). Contesting national belonging: An established-outsider figuration on the margins of Thessaloniki, Greece. Ph.D thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Pratsinakis, M. (2014). Resistance and compliance in immigrant-native figurations: Albanian and Soviet Greek immigrants and their interaction with Greek society. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(8), 1295–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pratsinakis, M. (2017). Established and outsider nationals: Immigrant–native relations and the everyday politics of national belonging. Ethnicities. doi: 10.1177/1468796817692838.
  18. Skey, M. (2011). National belonging and everyday life: The significance of nationhood in an uncertain world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Skey, M. (2013). Why do nations matter? The struggle for belonging and security in an uncertain world. The British journal of sociology, 64(1), 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Triandis, H. C. (1972). The analysis of subjective culture. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  21. Vassenden, A. (2010). Untangling the different components of Norwegianness*. Nations and Nationalism, 16(4), 734–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Voutira, E. (2006). Post-Soviet diaspora politics: The case of the Soviet Greeks. Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 24(2), 379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Waldinger, R. (2003). The sociology of immigration: Second thoughts and reconsiderations. In G. J. Reitz (Ed.), Center for comparative immigration research (pp. 21–43). San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  24. Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation–state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MacedoniaThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations