Abstract
This chapter critically examines dialogic forms of critical cosmopolitanism that share the liberal ambition of a genuine engagement with difference, but strive to make the ontological and ethical terms of such a dialogic interaction with alterity even more inclusive. The central issue for these approaches remains the accommodation of difference within an all-inclusive and ever-expanding community of interlocutors that cultivates a cosmopolitanism of intercommunal understanding and solidarity. Both Andrew Linklater’s dialogic cosmopolitan project and Richard Shapcott’s philosophical hermeneutics examined in this chapter subscribe to a vision of cosmopolitan solidarity based on either linguistically grounded, commonly agreed universal conditions of conversation (Linklater) or language as the sufficiently universal ontological horizon of communication (Shapcott). Yet, they both find themselves entrapped in a self-inflicted trade-off between community and diversity, identity and difference, universality and particularity, cosmopolitan aspirations and sociological pragmatism. Their cosmopolitan pluralism, then, remains ontic, premised on a foundational, rather than a political ontology, which condemns their two objectives, the achievement of community and the attainment of justice to difference, to a mutual irreconcilability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adorno, W. Theodore, and Max Horkheimer. 1997. Dialectic of Enlightenment. Trans. J. Cumming. London: Verso.
Bartelson, Jens. 2009. Visions of World Community. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Beardsworth, Richard. 2011. Cosmopolitanism and International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Polity.
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Oxford: Polity Press.
Benhabib, Seyla, and Maurizio Passerin d’Entrèves. 1996. Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity: Critical Essays on ‘The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity’. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brown, Chris. 1988. Ethics of Co-existence: The International Theory of Terry Nardin. Review of International Studies 14(3): 213–222.
———. 1994. ‘Turtles All the Way Down’: Anti-Foundationalism, Critical Theory and International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 23(2): 213–236.
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Colebrook, Claire. 2005. Philosophy and Post-structuralist Theory: From Kant to Deleuze. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Devetak, Richard. 1995. The Project of Modernity and International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 24(1): 27–51.
Dobson, Andrew. 2006. Thick Cosmopolitanism. Political Studies 54: 165–184.
Forum on Habermas and International Relations. 2005. Review of International Studies 31: 127–209.
Gadamer, H.-Georg. 1977. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Trans. D.E. Linge. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.
———. 2004. Truth and Method, 2nd rev. edn. London; New York: Continuum.
Guillaume, Xavier. 2011. International Relations and Identity: A Dialogical Approach. Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
Haacke, Jürgen. 1996. Theory and Praxis in International Relations: Habermas, Self-Reflection, Rational Argumentation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 25(2): 255–289.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1979. Communication and the Evolution of Society. Trans. T. McCarthy. London: Heinemann.
———. 1987a. Philosophy as Stand-in Interpreter. In After Philosophy: End or Transformation? eds. K. Baynes, J. Bohman, and T. McCarthy. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
———. 1987b. Modernity—An Incomplete Project. In Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look, eds. P. Rabinow and W. Sullivan. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Trans. C. Lehnhardt and S. Weber. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
———. 1995. Reconciliaton Through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’ Political Liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy 92(3): 109–131.
———. 1996a. Modernity: An Unfinished Project. In Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity: critical essays on ‘The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity’, eds. S. Benhabib and M. Passerin d’Entrèves. Cambridge: Polity Press.
———. 1996b. The Unity of Reason in the Diversity of Its Voices. In What Is Enlightenment? Eighteenth Century Answers and Twentieth Century Questions, ed. J. Schmidt. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.
———. 2000. On the Pragmatics of Communication, ed. Maeve Cooke. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hobson, M. John. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopgood, Stephen. 2000. Reading the Small Print in Global Civil Society: The Inexorable Hegemony of the Liberal Self. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29(1): 1–25.
Inayatullah, Naeem, and L. David Blaney. 2004. International Relations and the Problem of Difference. New York and London: Routledge.
Jackson, H. Robert. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jahn, Beate. 1998. One Step Forwards, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest Edition of Liberal Idealism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27(3): 613–641.
Linklater, Andrew. 1992. The Question of the Next Stage in International Relations Theory: A Critical-Theoretical Point of View. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 21(1): 77–98.
———. 1996. The Achievements of Critical Theory. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, eds. S. Smith, K. Booth, and M. Zalewski, 279–298. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1998. The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.
———. 2005. Dialogic Politics and the Civilising Process. Review of International Studies 31: 141–154.
———. 2007. Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, State and Humanity. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
———. 2011. The Problem of Harm in World Politics: Theoretical Investigations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nardin, Terry. 1983. Law, Morality, and the Relations of States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Shapcott, Richard. 2001. Justice, Community, and Dialogue: Philosophical Hermeneutics and the Cosmopolitan Project. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2002. Cosmopolitan Conversations: Justice, Dialogue and the Cosmopolitan Project. Global Society 16(3): 221–243.
———. 2008. Anti-Cosmopolitanism, Pluralism and the Cosmopolitan Harm Principle. Review of International Studies 34: 185–205.
Special Issue. 2011. International Relations in Dialogue. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39(3): 607–877.
Vincent, Andrew. 2004. The Nature of Political Theory. Oxford; NY: Oxford University Press.
Walker, R.B.J 1999. The Hierarchization of Political Community. Review of International Studies 25: 151–156.
Williams, John. 2015. Ethics, Diversity, and World Politics Saving Pluralism From Itself? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paipais, V. (2017). Depoliticisation in Critical Dialogic Ontologies. In: Political Ontology and International Political Thought. International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57069-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57069-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57068-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57069-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)