Abstract
This chapter shines a light on privatized processes of family mediation that unfold in the event of marital conflict. Socio-legal researchers have discussed family mediation as a black box in understandings of legal pluralism among British Asians, but also regarded it with suspicion, as a potential source of pressure on women to remain in unhappy or abusive marriages. The chapter shows that women, and men, claim family mediation as an entitlement contingent on having an arranged marriage, but that it is subject to pragmatic considerations. They also improvise kinship support in love marriages. The chapter concludes that family mediation cannot be characterized either as a centrifugal or centripetal force.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alavi, H. (1972). Kinship in West Punjab villages. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 6(1), 57–89.
Bano, S. (2012). Muslim women and Shari’ah councils: Transcending the boundaries of community and law. London: Palgrave.
Bott, E. (1957). Family and social network: Roles, norms, and external relationships in ordinary urban families. London: Tavistock.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dresch, P. (2012). Legalism, anthropology, and history: A view from part of anthropology. In P. Dresch & H. Skoda (Eds.), Legalism: Anthropology and history (pp. 1–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eglar, Z. (1960). A Punjabi village in Pakistan. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ferguson, N., Douglas, G., Lowe, N., Murch, M., & Robinson, M. (2004). Grandparenting in divorced families. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Finch, J., & Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. London: Routledge.
Grover, S. (2011). Marriage, love, caste and kinship support: Lived experiences of the urban poor in India. New Delhi: Social Science Press.
James, A., & Wilson, K. (2002). Couples, conflict, and change: Social work with marital relationships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jeffery, P. (2001). A ‘uniform customary code’? Marital breakdown and women’s economic entitlements in rural Bijnor. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 35(1), 1–32.
Jhutti-Johal, J. (2013). How parties to Sikh marriages use and are influenced by the norms of their religion and culture when engaging with mediation. In M. MacLean & J. Eelekaar (Eds.), Managing family justice in diverse societies (pp. 203–219). Oxford: Hart.
Mody, P. (2008). The intimate state: Love marriages and the law in Delhi. New Delhi: Routledge.
Shah-Kazemi, S. N. (2001). Untying the knot: Muslim women, divorce and the Shariah. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
Smart, C. (2005). Textures of family life: Further thoughts on change and commitment. Journal of Social Policy, 34(4), 541–556.
Stack, C., & Burton, L. (1994). Kinscripts. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 24(2), 157–170.
Vatuk, S. (1971). Trends in North Indian urban kinship: The ‘matrilateral asymmetry’ hypothesis. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 27, 287–307.
Vatuk, S. (1972). Kinship and urbanization: White collar migrants in North India. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Werbner, P. (1990). The migration process: Capital, gifts and offerings among British Pakistanis. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Werbner, R. (1991). Tears of the dead: The social biography of an African family. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Qureshi, K. (2016). Family Mediation. In: Marital Breakdown among British Asians. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57047-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57047-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57046-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-57047-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)