Restrictions on Pet Ownership in Multi-Owned Properties
Australia is a nation of pet owners with over sixty per cent of households including at least one companion animal. Yet despite the prevalence of companion animals, they are unevenly located across housing forms. Compared with detached privately owned housing, strata title developments have been particularly restrictive to pet-keeping. Drawing on qualitative research from Sydney, Australia, this chapter examines how pet ownership and practices of neighbouring apartments are shaped by the responsibilities that accompany pet-keeping. It highlights how pets can bring neighbours together, but also identifies likely points of tension. The chapter reviews the governance of pets through strata title and ethical implications of such governance. It reflects on the responsibilities of pet owners as well as those of the broader community of owners.
- ———. 2015. Policy Implications for Governing Australia’s Apartment Communities: Tenants, Committees of Management and Strata Managers. In Housing in 21st-Century Australia, ed. R. Dufty-Jones and D. Rogers, 121–138. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Animal Health Alliance. 2013. Pet Ownership in Australia 2013 Summary. Ultimo: Animal Health Alliance.Google Scholar
- Easthope, H., B. Randolph, and S. Judd. 2012. Governing the Compact City: The Role and Effectiveness of Strata Management. Sydney: City Futures Research Centre, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
- Franklin, A. 2006a. Animal Nation: The True Story of Animals and Australia. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
- Grier, K.C. 2006. Pets in America: A History. Chapel Hill: The University of Carolina Press.Google Scholar
- NSW Fair Trading. 2013. Strata Title Law Reform: Strata and Community Title Law Reform Position Paper. Parramatta: NSW Fair Trading.Google Scholar
- PIAS. 2010. Pets in the City. Petcare Information and Advisory Service. http://www.ideas.org.au/r/front/pets-in-the-city/2?category_id=3. Accessed 26 July 17.
- Sherry, C. 2013. Lessons in Personal Freedom and Functional Land Markets: What Strata and Community Title Can Learn from Traditional Doctrines of Property. UNSW Law Journal 36 (1): 280–315.Google Scholar