Advertisement

Addressing Conflict Within an Owners Corporation

  • Kathy Douglas
  • Robin Goodman
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines experiences of conflict within the committees of management in multi-owned property. Drawing on qualitative research in Victoria, Australia, the chapter highlights that many of the committee members interviewed lacked awareness of their responsibilities regarding conflict. Issues such as personality clashes, the expense and complexity of litigation, and the time taken in dealing with disputes were common areas of concern. The interview data reveals that committee members are keen to receive assistance with conflict engagement in order to enable them to address these issues effectively. We therefore argue that more effort is required by legislators to adequately educate and guide committee members to deal with conflict in the manner that is required.

References

  1. ABS. 2014. Melbourne Outpaces Sydney. Australian Bureau of Statistics Media Release. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/lookup/3235.0Media%20Release12013#Melbourn. Accessed 16 Oct 2015.
  2. Altmann, E. 2015a. Policy Implications for Governing Australia’s Apartment Communities: Tenants, Committees of Management and Strata Managers. In Housing in 21st Century Australia: People, Practices and Policies, ed. R. Dufty-Jones and D. Rogers, 121–136. Surry: Ashgate. ISBN: 978-1-4724-3113-4.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2015b. How Does High Density Living Impact Third Sector Organisations? An Exploration of Financial and Voluntary Workforce Implications for Non-profit Organisations. Australian and New Zealand Third Sector Review 20 (1): 185–205. ISSN 1323-9163.Google Scholar
  4. Birrell, B., and E. Healy. 2013. Melbourne’s High Rise Apartment Boom. Centre for Population and Urban Research, 4. http://apo.org.au/node/35798. Accessed 16 Oct 2015.
  5. Blandy, S., A. Dupuis, and J. Dixon. 2010. Introduction. In Multi-Owned Housing: Law, Power and Practice, ed. S. Blandy, A. Dupuis, and J. Dixon, 1–12. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bush, R.A.B., and J.P. Folger. 2005. The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict. 2nd Rev ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, P.T., K.G. Kugler, L. Bui-Wrzosinska, A. Nowak, and R. Vallacher. 2012. Getting Down to Basics: A Situated Model of Conflict in Social Relations. Negotiation Journal 28: 7–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2011.00324.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deutsch, M. 2002. Social Psychology’s Contributions to the Study of Conflict Resolution. Negotiation Journal 18: 307–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00263.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DOI. 2002. Melbourne 2030. Melbourne: Department of Infrastructure.Google Scholar
  11. Dredge, D., and J.E. Coiacetto. 2011. Strata Title: Towards a Research Agenda for Informed Planning Practice. Planning Practice and Research 26: 417–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Easthope, H., and S. Judd. 2010. Living Well in Greater Density. New South Wales: Shelter NSW.Google Scholar
  13. Easthope, H., and B. Randolph. 2009. Governing the Compact City: The Challenges of Apartment Living in Sydney, Australia. Housing Studies 24: 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Easthope, H., B. Randolph, and B. Judd. 2012. Governing the Compact City: The Role and Effectiveness of Strata Management. Kensington: City Futures Research Centre, University of NSW.Google Scholar
  15. Easthope, H., J. Warnken, C. Sherry, E. Coiacetto, D. Dredge, C. Guilding, N. Johnston, D. Lamminmaki, and S. Reid. 2014. How Property Title Impacts Urban Consolidation: A Life Cycle Examination of Multi-title Developments. Urban Policy and Research 32: 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feaver, D., and B. Sheehy. 2015. Designing Effective Regulation: A Positive Theory. University of New South Wales Law Review 38 (3): 961–994.Google Scholar
  17. Goodman, R., and K. Douglas. 2010. Life in a Master Planned Estate: Community and Lifestyle or Conflict and Liability? Urban Policy and Research 28 (4): 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnston, N., and E. Too. 2015. Multi-Owned Properties Law in Australia: A Governance Typology of Issues and Outcomes. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 8: 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelly, J.-F., P. Donegan, C. Chisholm, and M. Oberklaid. 2014. Mapping Australia’s Economy: Cities as Engines of Prosperity. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Kenna, T., and D. Stevenson. 2010. Negotiating Community Title: Residents’ Lived Experiences of Private Governance Arrangements in a Master Planned Estate. Urban Policy and Research 28: 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leshinsky, R., and C. Mouat. 2015. Towards Better Recognising ‘Community’ in Multi-Owned Property Law and Living. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 8: 484–501.Google Scholar
  22. Leshinsky, R., K. Douglas, P. Condliffe, and R. Goodman. 2012. Dispute Resolution Under the Owners’ corporation Act 2006 (Vic): Engaging with Conflict in Communal Living. Property Law Review 2: 39–63.Google Scholar
  23. McKenzie, E. 2003. Common Interest Housing in the Communities of Tomorrow. Housing Policy Debate 14 (1–2): 203–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Randolph, B. 2006. Delivering the Compact City in Australia: Current Trends and Future Implications. Urban Policy and Research 24 (4): 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reid, S. 2015. Exploring Social Interactions and Sense of Community in Multi-Owned Housing. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 8: 436–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sherry, C. 2008. The Legal Fundamentals of High Rise Buildings and Master Planned Estates: Ownership, Governance and Living in Multi-Owned Housing with a Case Study on Children’s Play. Australian Property Law Journal 16 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
  27. SoV. 2014. Plan Melbourne. Melbourne: State of Victoria.Google Scholar
  28. Spinney, A., M. Reynolds, M. Wulff, and R. Atkinson, 2011. Gentrification and Displacement: The Household Impacts of Neighbourhood Change. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. http://apo.org.au/node/23615. Accessed 16 Oct 2015.
  29. Yip, N., and R. Forrest. 2002. Property Owning Democracies? Home Owner Corporations in Hong Kong. Housing Studies 17 (5): 703–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathy Douglas
    • 1
  • Robin Goodman
    • 1
  1. 1.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations