Addressing Conflict Within an Owners Corporation
This chapter examines experiences of conflict within the committees of management in multi-owned property. Drawing on qualitative research in Victoria, Australia, the chapter highlights that many of the committee members interviewed lacked awareness of their responsibilities regarding conflict. Issues such as personality clashes, the expense and complexity of litigation, and the time taken in dealing with disputes were common areas of concern. The interview data reveals that committee members are keen to receive assistance with conflict engagement in order to enable them to address these issues effectively. We therefore argue that more effort is required by legislators to adequately educate and guide committee members to deal with conflict in the manner that is required.
- ABS. 2014. Melbourne Outpaces Sydney. Australian Bureau of Statistics Media Release. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/lookup/3235.0Media%20Release12013#Melbourn. Accessed 16 Oct 2015.
- Altmann, E. 2015a. Policy Implications for Governing Australia’s Apartment Communities: Tenants, Committees of Management and Strata Managers. In Housing in 21st Century Australia: People, Practices and Policies, ed. R. Dufty-Jones and D. Rogers, 121–136. Surry: Ashgate. ISBN: 978-1-4724-3113-4.Google Scholar
- ———. 2015b. How Does High Density Living Impact Third Sector Organisations? An Exploration of Financial and Voluntary Workforce Implications for Non-profit Organisations. Australian and New Zealand Third Sector Review 20 (1): 185–205. ISSN 1323-9163.Google Scholar
- Birrell, B., and E. Healy. 2013. Melbourne’s High Rise Apartment Boom. Centre for Population and Urban Research, 4. http://apo.org.au/node/35798. Accessed 16 Oct 2015.
- Blandy, S., A. Dupuis, and J. Dixon. 2010. Introduction. In Multi-Owned Housing: Law, Power and Practice, ed. S. Blandy, A. Dupuis, and J. Dixon, 1–12. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
- Bryman, A. 2012. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bush, R.A.B., and J.P. Folger. 2005. The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict. 2nd Rev ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- DOI. 2002. Melbourne 2030. Melbourne: Department of Infrastructure.Google Scholar
- Easthope, H., and S. Judd. 2010. Living Well in Greater Density. New South Wales: Shelter NSW.Google Scholar
- Easthope, H., B. Randolph, and B. Judd. 2012. Governing the Compact City: The Role and Effectiveness of Strata Management. Kensington: City Futures Research Centre, University of NSW.Google Scholar
- Feaver, D., and B. Sheehy. 2015. Designing Effective Regulation: A Positive Theory. University of New South Wales Law Review 38 (3): 961–994.Google Scholar
- Kelly, J.-F., P. Donegan, C. Chisholm, and M. Oberklaid. 2014. Mapping Australia’s Economy: Cities as Engines of Prosperity. Melbourne: Grattan Institute.Google Scholar
- Leshinsky, R., and C. Mouat. 2015. Towards Better Recognising ‘Community’ in Multi-Owned Property Law and Living. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis 8: 484–501.Google Scholar
- Leshinsky, R., K. Douglas, P. Condliffe, and R. Goodman. 2012. Dispute Resolution Under the Owners’ corporation Act 2006 (Vic): Engaging with Conflict in Communal Living. Property Law Review 2: 39–63.Google Scholar
- Sherry, C. 2008. The Legal Fundamentals of High Rise Buildings and Master Planned Estates: Ownership, Governance and Living in Multi-Owned Housing with a Case Study on Children’s Play. Australian Property Law Journal 16 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
- SoV. 2014. Plan Melbourne. Melbourne: State of Victoria.Google Scholar
- Spinney, A., M. Reynolds, M. Wulff, and R. Atkinson, 2011. Gentrification and Displacement: The Household Impacts of Neighbourhood Change. Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. http://apo.org.au/node/23615. Accessed 16 Oct 2015.