In Search of Common Patterns: Political Advertising in Central and Eastern Europe



This chapter focuses on a group of European Union (EU) member states located in Central and Eastern Europe. All are post-communist countries, although they can better be described today as emergent democracies with shared histories. They have some common political dynamics and share similar attitudes towards the EU including a desire to be seen as relevant to the Union as the ‘old’ member states. In our analysis, we are concerned with identifying similarities and differences in political advertising in this group of member states in the 2014 European Parliament elections. We have chosen these countries for several reasons. First, all countries in Central and Eastern Europe come into the category of ‘new EU members’ in that they joined in the years 2004–2013. Second, in their pre-accession period (and for some time afterwards) these countries were part of a series of specific organizations and agreements that contributed to shaping a distinct political and socio-economic regional identity.


  1. Bellucci, P., Garzia, D., & Rubal, M. (2012). Does Europe matter in European elections? A composite model of the 2009 European Parliament elections. In S. Banducci, M. Franklin, H. Giebler, S. Hobolt, M. Marsh, W. Van Der Brug, & C. van Der Eijk (eds.), An audit of democracy in the European Union (pp. 41–54). Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Ferrara, F., & Weishaupt, J. T. (2004). Get your act together: Party performance in European Parliament elections. European Union Politics, 5(3), 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hix, S., & Marsh, M. (2007). Punishment or protest? Understanding European Parliament elections. Journal of Politics, 69(2), 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hobolt, S. B., Spoon, J. J., & Tilley, J. (2008). A Vote Against Europe? Explaining Defection at the 1999 and 2004 European Parliament Elections. British Journal of Political Scienc e, 39(1), 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jacobs, F., Bertoncini, Y., Kreilinger, V., Van Kessel, S., Pirro, A., Otjes, L. P., Piedrafita, S, S., & Renman, V. (2014). European Parliament election 2014. Forum. Intereconomics 2014, 49(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  6. Kaid, L. L., & Davison, D. K. (1986). Elements of videostyle: Candidate presentation through television advertising. In L. L. Kaid, D. Nimmo, & K. R. Sanders (eds.), New perspectives on political advertising (pp. 184–209). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kaid, L. L., & Johnston, A. (2001). Videostyle in presidential campaigns: Style and content of televised political advertising. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  8. Marsh, M. (2007). Vote switching in European Parliament elections: Evidence from June 2004. In M. Marsh, S. Mikhaylov & H. Schmitt (eds.), European elections after eastern enlargement (pp. 71–95). Mannheim: CONNEX.Google Scholar
  9. Marsh, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2010). European Parliament elections and EU governance. Living Reviews in European Governance, 5(4). Retrieved from.
  10. Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (eds.) (2002). Democracies and the populist challenge. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  11. Reif, K. (1984). National election cycles and European elections, 1979 and 1984. Electoral Studies, 3(3), 244–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order national elections. A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Trechsel, A. H., De Sio, L., & Garzia, D. (2014). Ist die ZeitReif? 2014 as the first (truly) European elections. Retrieved from
  14. Treib, O. (2014). The voters says no, but nobody listens: Causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10), 1541–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of BucharestBucureștiRomania
  2. 2.Maria Curie-Sklodowska UniversityLublinPoland
  3. 3.University of BucharestBucureștiRomania
  4. 4.University of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK
  5. 5.National University of Public ServiceBudapestHungary
  6. 6.Institute for Political Science of the HungarianBudapestHungary
  7. 7.University of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  8. 8.Information StudiesNovo mestoSlovenia

Personalised recommendations