The Context of the South American Games

  • Gonzalo A. Bravo
  • David J. Shonk
  • Jorge Silva-Bórquez
  • Silvana González-Mesina
Part of the Mega Event Planning book series (MEGAEP)


This chapter explores the origins and evolution of the Games in the context of a region that had experienced important political, cultural, and economic changes. Due to an increased awareness within the public sector of the role of sport, the last decade has witnessed the passage of sport legislation and the establishment of public agencies in many South American countries. Both have contributed to justify public investment in sport. While the future of the South American Games lies in the hands of the governing body ODESUR, growth and sustainability depends on governments’ willingness to fund and support these initiatives. The rise of the South American Games provides evidence of the critical role sport plays as a part of the public policies of the countries in South America.


Regionalism South American identity ODESUR Public sector involvement 


  1. Acta XXV Asamblea ODESUR. (2012). Acta Asamblea Ordinaria ODESUR de Mayo 2012. ODESUR. Asociación de Confederaciones Deportivas Suramericanas.Google Scholar
  2. Acta XXVI Asamblea ODESUR. (2013). Acta Asamblea Ordinaria ODESUR de Septiembre 201. Asociación de Confederaciones Deportivas Suramericanas.Google Scholar
  3. Alabarces, P. (2002). Fútbol y patria: el fútbol y las narrativas de la nación en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros Editorial.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, P. (1988). Democracia y dictadura en América Latina en la década del’70. Cuadernos de Sociología, 2, 33–45.Google Scholar
  5. Arenas-García, N. (2012). 21st century regionalism in South America: UNASUR and the search for development alternatives. Esharp, 18, 64–85.Google Scholar
  6. Balmer, N. J., Nevill, A. M., & Williams, A. M. (2003). Modelling home advantage in the summer Olympic games. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21(6), 469–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernard, A. B., & Busse, M. R. (2004). Who wins the Olympic games: Economic resources and medal totals. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bierck, H. A. (1951). Selected writings of Bolivar. New York: Colonial Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cano Linares, M. Á. (2015). The Union of South American Nations: An emerging regional organization. In M. Odello & F. Seatzu (Eds.), Latin American and Caribbean international institutional law (pp. 43–64). The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Capili, J. W. P. (2017). Pan-Asian sports and the emergence of modern Asia, 1913–1974. [Review of the book, Pan-Asian sports and the emergence of modern Asia, 1913–1974, by S, Huebner]. Social Science Diliman, 13(1), 78–81.Google Scholar
  11. Capretti, S. (2010). La cultura en juego. El deporte en la sociedad moderna y post-moderna. Trabajo y Sociedad, 16, 231–250.Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, S. R. (2000, June). Home advantage in the Olympic Games. In Proceedings of the 5th Australian Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sport (pp. 76–85). University of Technology Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  13. COSAN (2014). Memoria X Juegos Suramericanos Santiago 2014. Corporación Santiago 2014, Instituto Nacional de Deportes. Gobierno de Chile.Google Scholar
  14. Dávila, J. (2013). Dictatorship in South America. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  15. El (2010, March 31). ¡Cinco en Todo! Retrieved from
  16. Gamero Casado, E. (2003). Poderes públicos y deporte. Ponencias presentadas al Congreso Internacional Andalucía Tierra del Deporte. Sevilla: Consejeria de Turismo, Comercio y Deporte.Google Scholar
  17. Gardini, G. L. (2012). Latin America in the 21st century: Nations, regionalism, globalization. Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  18. Historial. (n.d.). ODESUR—Organización Deportiva Suramericana. Retrieved from
  19. Houlihan, B. (1994). Sport and international politics. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  20. IND. (2014). Resumen de los X Juegos Suramericanos y I Parasuramericanos [Document produced by Instituto Nacional de Deportes de Chile] Santiago Chile.Google Scholar
  21. Kaltenthaler, K., & Mora, F. O. (2002). Explaining Latin American economic integration: The case of Mercosur. Review of International Political Economy, 9(1), 72–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelner, M. (2017, October 6). IOC suspends Carlos Nuzman after gold bar corruption allegation. The Guardian. Retrieved from
  23. Linke-Behrens, L. (2015). South American regionalism: Explaining the foundation of UNASUR (KFG Working Paper Series, No 67). Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
  24. List of Countries in Latin America. (2017). Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Retrieved from
  25. Loveman, B. (2011). Military government in Latin America, 1959–1990. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mc Sherry, J. P. (2009). Los estados depredadores: la Operación Cóndor y la guerra encubierta en América Latina. Santiago de Chile: Lom Ediciones.Google Scholar
  27. Minkel, C. W., Hayford, C. W., Gade, D. W., Griffin, E. C., Germany, G., Knapp, G. W., et al. (2017). South America. In Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Retrieved from
  28. Silva Bórquez, J., & González Mesina, S. (2016). Multisport games in South America. In G. Bravo, R. López de D’Amico, & C. Parrish (Eds.), Sport in Latin America. Policy, organization, management (pp. 176–195). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Smolianov, P., & Smith, J. (2017). High performance and lifelong fitness practices [Book of lectures within the Sport Science program at Salem State University and University of Northern Iowa]. Salem, MA and Cedar Falls, IA: Salem State University and University of Northern Iowa.Google Scholar
  30. Soderbaum, F. (2003). Introduction: Theories of new regionalism. In F. Söderbaum & T. M. Shaw (Eds.), Theories of new regionalism (pp. 1–21). Basingstoke, UK: A Palgrave Reader.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Söderbaum, F., & Granit, J. (2014). The political economy of regionalism: The relevance for international waters and the global environment facility. A STAP issues paper. Washington, DC: Global Environment Facility.Google Scholar
  32. Toronto 2015. (n.d.). Medal Count. Toronto 2015 Pan Am and Para Pan Am. Retrieved from
  33. Torres, C. R., & Kidd, B. (2016). Introduction: The history and relevance of the pan-American games. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 33(1–2), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yoder, A. (2016). Sport policy and political regimes in Latin America. In G. Bravo, R. López de D’Amico, & C. Parrish (Eds.), Sport in Latin America. Policy, organization, management (pp. 65–76). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gonzalo A. Bravo
    • 1
  • David J. Shonk
    • 2
  • Jorge Silva-Bórquez
    • 3
  • Silvana González-Mesina
    • 4
  1. 1.Exercise and Sport SciencesWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  2. 2.Sport & Recreation ManagementJames Madison UniversityHarrisonburgUSA
  3. 3.Pontifical Catholic University of ChileSantiagoChile
  4. 4.Freelance JournalistSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations