Skip to main content

Power Without Representation: The Coherence and Closeness of the Trilateral Commission

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Think Tanks and Global Politics

Abstract

This chapter argues that governance networks claiming to represent the global public opinion need to follow two opposing principles: coherence and openness. To probe this argument and observe its practical implications, the authors focus on the Trilateral Commission (TC), which brings together leaders of several influential think tanks and outstanding personalities from business corporations, political organizations, academic institutions, and media firms. They find that the TC is highly coherent but excessively endogamous, centering on an exclusive group of pro-US leaders, members of transnational corporations, and partisans of free trade. Thus, the TC is a coherent but closed network, very powerful but scarcely representative, which is ironic for a network that claims to promote the use of “soft power” in the international sphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barry, D. 2009. Holding Firm Against Plots by Evildoers. The New York Times, June 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boiral, O. 2003. Trente ans d’une institution secrete. Pouvoirs opaques de la Trilatèrale. Le Monde Diplomatique, November 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burris, V. 2008. The Interlock Structure of the Policy-Planning Network and the Right Turn in US State Policy. Research in Political Sociology 17 (1): 3–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. 2005. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., K. Kaiser, and M. Cosaca. 1977. Toward a Renovated International System. The Triangle Papers, 14. Washington, DC: The Trilateral Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, M.J., S.P. Huntington, and J. Watanuki. 1975. The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracy to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. 1991. American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. 2011. Who Elected the Bankers? Capital and Resistance in an Era of Transnational Technocratic Politics, Interview with Dr Iraklis Oikonomou. http://stephengill.com/news/2011/12/who-elected-the-bankers.html. Accessed 30 July 2016.

  • Luna, M., and J.L. Velasco. 2010. Mecanismos de toma de decisiones y desempeño en sistemas asociativos complejos. In Nuevas perspectivas en el estudio de las asociaciones, ed. M. Luna and C. Puga. Barcelona: Anthropos/IIS-UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, M., and J.L. Velasco. 2013. Legitimidad y eficacia en la Sección Norteamérica de la Comisión Trilateral. In ¿Cómo se gobierna América del Norte? Estrategias, instituciones y políticas públicas, ed. M. Luna and A. Salas-Porras. Mexico City: UNAM/SITESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna, M., and J.L. Velasco. 2017, in process. Complex Associative Systems: Cooperation amid Diversity. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J.S. 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J.N. 2004. Strong Demand, Huge Supply: Governance in an Emerging Epoch. In Multi-Level Governance, ed. I. Bache and M. Flinders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas-Porras, A. 2012. La red de centros de pensamiento de América del Norte: ¿Cómo se construye y sostiene un consenso a favor del TLCAN? In ¿Quién gobierna América del Norte? Elites, redes y organizaciones, ed. A. Salas-Porras and M. Luna. Mexico City: UNAM/SITESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trilateral Commission (TC). 2016. The Trilateral Commission. http://trilateral.org. Accessed 12 Jan 2016.

  • Tucker, J.P. 2008. Global Elite Gather in DC. American Free Press. http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/global_elite_gather_135.html. Accessed 15 Aug 2012.

  • Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, vol. I. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, P. 2009. Obama: Trilateral Commission Endgame. Technocracy News, January 29. https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2009/01/29/obama-trilateral-commission-endgame. Accessed 21 Jan 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Karin Fischer’s comments to the initial draft of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Luna, M., Velasco, J.L. (2017). Power Without Representation: The Coherence and Closeness of the Trilateral Commission. In: Salas-Porras, A., Murray, G. (eds) Think Tanks and Global Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56756-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics