Skip to main content

Promoting an Interdisciplinary Campus Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technology, Theory, and Practice in Interdisciplinary STEM Programs

Abstract

This chapter synthesizes best practices and lessons learned in order to facilitate the transfer of knowledge between courses, disciplines, programs, research fields, and industry. It describes strategic institutional integration that transforms approaches to recruitment, teaching, mentoring, supervision, communication, and collaboration within and across laboratories. Research and education are integrated with a focus on inquiry-based learning and developing a global workforce by expanding industry partnerships. This chapter also contributes to the dialogue on best institutional approaches focused on attracting, retaining, and preparing underrepresented students. The cross-institutional strategies, faculty development, and initiatives described provide real-life examples of what works toward these goals and what sustains and multiplies these efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the most current enrollment information, see http://air.citytech.cuny.edu/air/FRD.aspx

  2. 2.

    Project Kaleidoscope, What works: Building Natural Science Communities, ed. Jeanne L. Narum (Washington, D.C.: Author, 1991); Sigma Xi. An Exploration of the Nature and Quality of Undergraduate Education in Science, Mathematics and Engineering: A Report of the National Advisory Group of Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Society (Racine, WI: The Scientific Research Society, 1989).

  3. 3.

    Marilyn J. Amey, Denise Brown, and Lorilee R. Sandmann, ā€œA Multidisciplinary Collaborative Approach to a University-Community Partnership: Lessons Learned,ā€ Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 7, no. 3 (2002): 19ā€“26; Cinda P. Scott, Bonne August, and Costanza Eggers-PiĆ©rola, ā€œAll Hands on Deck: Using Case Studies to Support Institutional Change.ā€ In Cases on Interdisciplinary Research Trends in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Studies on Urban Classrooms, ed. Reneta D. Lansiquot, 320ā€“348 (New York: Information Science Reference, 2013).

  4. 4.

    Hanover Research, Project-Based Learning and Best Practices for Delivering High School STEM Education (Arlington, VA: Hanover Research, 2015).

  5. 5.

    Aman Yadav, Megan Vinh, Gregory M. Shaver, Peter Meckl, and Stephanie Firebaugh, ā€œCase-Based Instruction: Improving Studentsā€™ Conceptual Understanding Through Cases in a Mechanical Engineering Course,ā€ Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Beatriz Clewell, Clemencia Cosentino de Cohen, Lisa Tsui, and Nicole Deterding, Revitalizing the Nationā€™s Talent Pool in STEM: Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute, 2006).

  7. 7.

    Alma Harris, Distributed Leadership Matters (Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, 2013).

  8. 8.

    Allan Bolton, ā€œA Rose by Any Other Name,ā€ Quality Assurance in Education 3, no. 2 (1995): 13ā€“8.

  9. 9.

    Harvard Graduate School of Education Askwith Forum, ā€œA Space of Their Own? Girls, Women, and STEMā€ (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education, 2015).

Bibliography

  • Amey, Marilyn J., Denise Brown, and Lorilee R. Sandmann. 2002. A multidisciplinary collaborative approach to a university-community partnership: Lessons learned. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 7(3): 19ā€“26.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bolton, Allan. 1995. A rose by any other name. Quality Assurance in Education 3(2): 13ā€“18.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Clewell, Beatriz, Clemencia Cosentino de Cohen, Lisa Tsui, and Nicole Deterding. 2006. Revitalizing the nationā€™s talent pool in STEM: Science, technology, engineering and math. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Hanover Research. 2015. Project-based learning and best practices for delivering high school STEM education. Arlington: Hanover Research.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Harris, Alma. 2013. Distributed leadership matters. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Harvard Graduate School of Education Askwith Forum. 2015. A space of their own? Girls, women, and STEM.ā€ Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education. http://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/15/02/space-their-own-girls-women-and-stem.

  • New York City College of Technology. 2014. Frequently requested student data. Brooklyn: New York City College of Technology. http://air.citytech.cuny.edu/air/FRD.aspx.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Project Kaleidoscope. 1991. In What works: Building natural science communities, ed. Jeanne L. Narum. Washington, DC: Author. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED351188.pdf.

  • Scott, Cinda P., Bonne August, and Costanza Eggers-PiĆ©rola. 2013. All hands on deck: Using case studies to support institutional change. In Cases on interdisciplinary research trends in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: Studies on urban classrooms, ed. Reneta D. Lansiquot, 320ā€“348. New York: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2214-2.ch013.

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Sigma Xi. 1989. An exploration of the nature and quality of undergraduate education in science, mathematics and engineering: A report of the national advisory group of Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society. Racine: The Scientific Research Society.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Yadav, Aman, Megan Vinh, Gregory M. Shaver, Peter Meckl, and Stephanie Firebaugh. 2014. Case-based instruction: Improving studentsā€™ conceptual understanding through cases in a mechanical engineering course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51: 659ā€“677. doi:10.1002/tea.21149.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the faculty, students, and staff of City Tech who have generously contributed to our understanding of the projectā€™s impact. We also wish to thank Dr. Russell Hotzler, President of City Tech, and our Program Directors at NSF for their support. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 930242. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

Ā© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eggers-PiƩrola, C., August, B., Scott, C.P., Brown, P., Lansiquot, R.D. (2016). Promoting an Interdisciplinary Campus Culture. In: Lansiquot, R. (eds) Technology, Theory, and Practice in Interdisciplinary STEM Programs. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56739-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56739-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56738-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56739-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics