Skip to main content

Analysis: Exploring the Six Explanations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rescuing EU Emissions Trading

Abstract

As was shown in Chap. 2, there has been increasing agreement among member-states on the need for reform, with a pivotal change in Germany after the 2013 elections. The 2030 package outcome increased the room for integrative bargaining, which was essential to get acquiescence from sceptical member-states. Launching the less controversial MSR proposal put the Commission on firmer political ground as to ETS reform. Cross-party cooperation in the European Parliament was facilitated by compromise deals and reinforced by the 2014 elections. Energy-intensive industries exhausted by the heated backloading debate became somewhat less opposed to reform. The wish to avoid an embarrassing loss of prestige as an ETS frontrunner added some external pressure, but not nearly as strong as the ‘Copenhagen effect’ back in 2008.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wettestad, J., Jevnaker, T. (2016). Analysis: Exploring the Six Explanations. In: Rescuing EU Emissions Trading. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56674-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics