Skip to main content

Anthropology at the Time of the Anthropocene: A Personal View of What Is to Be Studied

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability ((PSAS))

Abstract

Although the term anthropocene proposed by geologists and climatologists has created much debate, it is hard to resist the importance it could have to define the discipline of anthropology. For a discipline dedicated to the plurality of cultures, the fact that earth scientists insist on bringing on the foreground still one more definition of the ‘anthropos’, this time considered as a new force of nature, has enormous consequences for the discipline. The chapter lists several of those consequences that could reopen a conversation between ‘physical’ and ‘cultural’ anthropology and, of special relevance to the vast question of ‘sustainability’, reopen the ways in which anthropology could be politically relevant.

This chapter was first presented as the Distinguished Lecture at the American Association of Anthropologists annual meeting held in Washington in December 2014.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chakrabarty, D. 2008. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry 35: 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danowski, D., and E. Viveiros de Castro. 2016. The Ends of the World. Trans. Rodrigo Nunes. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin. Environmental Humanities 6: 159–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, E. 2013. How Forest Think. Towards an Anthropology Beyond the Human. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1961[1955]. Tristes Tropiques. Trans. John Russell. New York: Criterion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J., and L. Margulis. 1974. Atmospheric Homeostasis by and for the Biosphere: The Gaia Hypothesis. Tellus 26 (1–2): 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. 2011. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, E. 2016. Geontologies: A Requiem to Late Liberalism. Durham: Duke.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz, I. 2008. The Earth After Us. What Legacy will Humans Leave in the Rocks? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Latour .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Latour, B. (2017). Anthropology at the Time of the Anthropocene: A Personal View of What Is to Be Studied. In: Brightman, M., Lewis, J. (eds) The Anthropology of Sustainability. Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56636-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56636-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56635-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56636-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics