Traditional People, Collectors of Diversity

Chapter

Abstract

Using as a parable the work of Schrodinger and Georgescu-Roegen, who established that diversity is a necessary condition for life, this chapter calls on ethnography to argue that traditional people seem to value diversity per se and, moreover, that they may actively produce it. A sustainable future may well hinge on their own diversity.

References

  1. Achtak, H., M. Ater, A. Oukabli, S. Santoni, F. Kjellberg, and B. Khadari. 2010. Traditional Agroecosystems as Conservatories and Incubators of Cultivated Plant Varietal Diversity: The Case of Fig (Ficus carica L.) in Morocco. BMC Plant Biology 10: 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, C., L. Munari, N. Van Vliet, et al. 2013. Diversifying Incomes and Losing Landscape Complexity in Quilombola Shifting Cultivation Communities of the Atlantic Rainforest (Brazil). Human Ecology 41 (1): 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AIPP (Asia Indigenous People Pact) and IWGIA. 2014. Shifting Cultivation, Livelihood and Food Security. www.aippnet.org: www.iwgia.org
  4. Balée, W. 1993. Biodiversidade e os ìndios Amazônicos. In Amazônia: Etnologia e História Indígena, ed. E. Viveiros de Castro and M. Carneiro da Cunha, 385–395. São Paulo: FAPESP/NHII/USP.Google Scholar
  5. Barbosa de Almeida, M. 1990. Symmetry and Entropy: Mathematical Metaphors in the Work Of Lévi-Strauss. Current Anthropology 31 (4): 367–385.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2014. Metafísicas do Fim do Mundo e Encontros Pragmáticos com Entropia. Paper presented to the Symposium Os Mil Nomes de Gaia: Do Antropoceno à Idade da Terra, held in Rio de Janeiro, September 15–19, 2014, ms.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2016. Desenvolvimento antrópico e a alternativa de diversidade. Ruris 10 (1): 19–39.Google Scholar
  8. Bartolini, G., G. Prevost, C. Messeri, G. Carignani, and U. Menini. 1998. Olive Germplasm. Cultivars and World-Wide Collections. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  9. Boster, J.S. 1983. A Comparison of the Diversity of Jivaroan Gardens with That of the Tropical Forest. Human Ecology 2 (1): 47–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brush, S.B. 1991. A Farmer Based Approach to Conserving Crop Germplasm. Economic Botany 45: 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 1995. In Situ Conservation of Landraces in Centers of Crop Diversity. Crop Science 35: 346–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cabalzar, A., and B. Ricardo, eds. 2006. Mapa-Livro Povos Indígenas do Rio Negro. 3rd ed. São Paulo: ISA & FOIRN.Google Scholar
  13. Caillon, S., J. Quero-Garcia, J.-P. Lescure, and V. Lebot. 2006. Nature of taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) Genetic Diversity Prevalent in a Pacific Ocean Island, Vanua Lava, Vanuatu. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53 (6): 1273–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chernela, J. 1986. Os Cultivares de Mandioca na Área do Uaupés (Tukâno). In Suma Etnológica Brasileira 1, Etnobiologia, ed. D. Ribeiro, 151–158. Vozes: Petrópolis.Google Scholar
  15. Collette, L., D. Luchetti, D. Pilling, A. Asfaw, and A. Fonteneau. 2015. Main Conclusions and Opportunities. In Coping with Climate Change – The Roles of Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, 101–112. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  16. Conklin, Harold C. 1954. The Relation of Hanunóo Culture to the Plant World. MS. Thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 1962. Lexicographical Treatment of Folk Taxonomies. International Journal of American Linguistics 28 (2), IV: 119–141.Google Scholar
  18. Costa, L. Vilagelim, M.T. Gomes Lopes, R. Lopes, and S.R.M. Alves. 2008. Polinização e fixação de frutos em Capsicum chinense Jacq. Acta Amazonica 38 (2): 361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Couly, C. 2009. Savoirs locaux, usages et gestion de la biodiversité agricole et forestière en Amazonie brésilienne: cas des Ribeirinhos de la Forêt nationale du Tapajós (Pará). PhD dissertation, UnB et Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle.Google Scholar
  20. Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1868. Variations of Animals and Plants under Domestication. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  22. Descola, P. 1986. La Nature domestique. Symbolisme et praxis dans l’écologie des Achuar. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 1996. Constructing Natures: Symbolic Ecology and Social Practice. In Nature and society: Anthropological Perspectives, ed. P. Descola and G. Pálsson, 82–102. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dufour, D.L. 1993. Uso de la Selva Tropical por los indígenas Tukano del Vaupés. In La Selva Humanizada, ed. F. Correa, 47–62. Bogotá: Instituto Colombiano de Antropologia.Google Scholar
  25. Elias, M., L. Rival, and D. Mc Key. 2000. Perception and Management of Cassava Diversity Among Macushi Amerindians of Guyana. Journal of Ethnobiology 20 (2): 239–265.Google Scholar
  26. Emperaire, L. 2000. Approche ethnologique et socioeconomique dela gestion de la diversité variétale du manioc, haut Rio Negro (Yauareté). Rapport de mission, IRD et ISA, ms 20pp.Google Scholar
  27. Emperaire, L., F. Pinton, and G. Second. 1998. Gestion dynamique de la diversité variétale du manioc (Manihot esculenta) en Amazonie du Nord-Ouest. Natures, Sciences et Sociétés 6 (2): 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Emperaire, L., P. Robert, J. Santilli, L. Eloy, E. Katz, C.L. López Garces, A.-E. Laques, M.C. Cunha, and M. Almeida. 2008. Diversité agricole et patrimoine dans le moyen Rio Negro. Les Actes du BRG 7: 139–153.Google Scholar
  29. Emperaire, L. (ed.), L. van Velthem, A.G. de Oliveira, J. Santilli, M. Carneiro da Cunha, and E. Katz. 2010. Dossiê de registro do sistema agrícola tradicional do Rio Negro. Brasília: ACIMRN/IRD/IPHAN/Unicamp-CNPq. 235p. http://portal.iphan.gov.br/uploads/ckfinder/arquivos/Dossie_sistema_agricola_rio_negro.pdf
  30. Emperaire, L., L. Eloy, and A.C. Seixas. 2014. Quando a agrobiodiversidade cruza a BR, Agrobiodiversidade na região de Cruzeiro do Sul, Acre.Google Scholar
  31. Feynman, Richard. 1965. The Character of Physical Laws. Modern Library.Google Scholar
  32. Fleck, D.W. 1997. Mammalian Diversity in Rainforest Habitats as Recognized by Matses Indians in Peruvian Amazon. MS. Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
  33. ISA, FOIRN et al. 2007–2009. (Instituto Socioambiental (ISA); Federação das Organizações Indígenas do Rio Negro (FOIRN); Organização Indígena da Bacia do Içana (OIBI); Escola Indígena Baniwa e Coripaco (EIBC-Pamáali); Escola Indígena Paraattana (EIBP); Escola Indígena Mádzeero; Escola Indígena Walipere-Dakenai; Escola Indígena Eenawi). Base de Dados do Projeto de Pesquisa “Pimentas na Bacia do Içana-Ayari: bases para a sustentabilidade da produção e comercialização” (database).Google Scholar
  34. Kawa, N.C., C. Mccarty, and C.R. Clement. 2013. Manioc Varietal Diversity, Social Networks, and Distribution Constraints in Rural Amazonia. Current Anthropology 54: 764–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kerr, W. 1987. Agricultura e Seleçãogenética de Plantas. In Etnobiologia, vol. 1 of Suma Etnologica Brasileira, ed. B. Ribeiro, 159–72. Petrópolis: FINEP and Vozes.Google Scholar
  36. Lévi-Strauss, C. 1962. La Pensée Sauvage. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
  37. Mendes dos Santos, G., and Y. Antonini. 2008. The Traditional Knowledge on Stingless Bees (Apidae: Meliponina) Used by the Enawene-Nawe Tribe in Western Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 4: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nicholas, Georgescu-Roegen. 1986. The Entropy Law and the Economic Process in Retrospect. Eastern Economic Journal 12 (1): 475–497.Google Scholar
  39. Padoch, C., E. Brondizio, S. Costa, M. Pinedo-Vasquez, R.R. Sears, and A. Siqueira. 2008. Urban Forest and Rural Cities: Multi-Sited Households, Consumption Patterns, and Forest Resources in Amazonia. Ecology and Society 13 (2): 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pinedo-Vasquez, M., M. Zarin, D. Jipp, and J. Chota-Inuma. 1990. Use-Values of Tree Species in a Communal Forest Reserve in Northeast Peru. Conservation Biology 4 (4): 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Prance, G.T., W. Balée, B. Boom, and R. Carneiro. 1987. Quantitative Ethnobotany and the Case for Conservation in the Amazon. Conservation Biology 1 (4): 296–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rival, L., and D. McKey. 2008. Domestication and Diversity in Manioc (Manihot esculenta Crantz ssp. esculenta, Euphorbiaceae). Current Anthropology 49 (6): 1119–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robert, P., C. López Garcés, A.-E. Laques, and M. Coelho-Ferreira. 2012. A beleza das roças: agrobiodiversidade Mebêngôkre-Kayapó em tempos de globalização. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi Ciências Humanas 7: 339–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sahlins, M. 1972. The Original Affluent Society. In Stone Age Economics, 1–39.Google Scholar
  45. Salick, J., N. Cellinese, and S. Knapp. 1997. Indigenous Diversity of Cassava: Generation, Maintenance Use and Loss Among the Amuesha, Peruvian Upper Amazon. Economic Botany 51 (1): 6–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schrodinger, E. 1967 [1944]. What is Life? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Sen, A. 1981. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Shepard, G.H., W. Douglas, L.M. Yu, and M. Italiano. 2001. Rainforest Habitat Classification Among the Matsigenka of the Peruvian Amazon. Journal of Ethnobiology 21 (1): 1–38.Google Scholar
  49. Smith, M. 2013. Árvores de Cultura: Cultivo e Uso do Pequi (Caryocar sp., Caryocaraceae) entre os Kuikuro do Alto Xingu, MT. PhD dissertation, University of Brasília.Google Scholar
  50. Tsing, A.L. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connections. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Twiller, A. 2014. Agricultural Biodiversity: The Foundation of Resilient Family Farms. Rural 21 48: 24–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.University of São PauloState of São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations