Skip to main content

The Gaia Complex: Ethical Challenges to an Anthropocentric ‘Common Future’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability ((PSAS))

Abstract

The Brundtland Report (World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future, The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 1987) envisaged a ‘Common Future’ in which humankind would undertake ‘sustainable development’, in theory including the interests of the non-human. In the same year, James Lovelock proposed that humankind comprised the ‘brains’ of Gaia, with a directive role in relation to other species and things. Since then, in a globalised market economy, discourses have increasingly framed ecosystems and their non-human inhabitants as providers of ‘services’ to human communities. Resource use has intensified exponentially, and other species are facing unprecedented rates of anthropogenically caused extinctions. Questioning both the propriety and the wisdom of adhering to anthropocentric positionality, ethicists have underlined the need to consider more equally the interests and the agentive capacities of the non-human. For anthropologists, traditionally focused on humankind, this presents some ethical and practical challenges. This chapter considers how we might address some of these.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allan, A. 2011. Virtual Water: Tackling the Threat To Our Planet’s Most Precious Resource. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K., and G. Bridge. 2006. Material Worlds? Resource Geographies and the “Matter of Nature”. Progress in Human Geography 30: 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. 1987 [1972]. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution and Epistemology. London/Northvale/New Jersey: Jason Aronson Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, B. 2005. A Theory of Ecological Justice. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. 2009. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bird-David, N. 1999. ‘Animism’ Revisited: Personhood, Environment and Relational Epistemology. Current Anthropology 40 (Supplement): 67–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, N. 2008. Material Cultures, Material Minds: The Impact of Things on Human Thought, Society, and Evolution. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldararo, N. 2004. Sustainability, Human Ecology, and the Collapse of Complex Societies: Economic Anthropology and a 21st Century Adaptation. New York/London: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., J. Macleod, and A. Neimanis, eds. 2013. Thinking With Water. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D., and S. Frost. 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency and Politics. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, P., and E. Stoermer 2000. The “Anthropocene”. In Global Change Newsletter, 41. The International Geosphere–Biosphere Programme (IGBP): A Study of Global Change, International Council for Science (ICSU). 17–18. http://www.igbp.net/download/18.316f18321323470177580001401/NL41.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 15.

  • Descola, P., and G. Palsson, eds. 1996. Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. 2005. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. 1998. Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Distributive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, T. 2013. Deep and Shallow Time in Social Change. In Regimes of Temporality: Investigating the Plurality and Order of Times Across Histories, Cultures, Technologies, Materialities and Media. International Conference, University of Oslo, June 5–7, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. 1999. After Nature: steps to an anti-essentialist political ecology. Current Anthropology 40 (1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, A. 2010. Naturalcultural Encounters in Bali: Monkeys, Temples, Tourists and Ethnoprimatology. Cultural Anthropology 25 (4): 600–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, A., and L. Wolfe, eds. 2002. Primates Face to Face: Conservation Implications of Human and Nonhuman Primate Interconnections. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency. An Anthropological Theory. Oxford/New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosden, C. 2013. Time and Nationhood: Beyond the Invention of Tradition and Imagined Communities. In About Time. Lecture Series, Institute of Advanced Study, Durham, May 13, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, E. 2010. Fingereyes: impressions of cup corals. Cultural Anthropology 25 (4): 577–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, L., and J. Atchison. 2009. Cultural ecology: emerging human-plant geographies. Progress in Human Geography 33: 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, S. 2009. Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. 1999. The shadow our future throws. New Perspectives Quarterly 16 (2): 14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. 2012. Towards an ecology of materials. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 427–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T., and G. Palsson, eds. 2013. Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Union for the Conservation of Nature. 2015. Species Extinction: The Facts. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/species_extinction_05_2007.pdf. Accessed 26 Apr 15.

  • Kirksey, S., and S. Helmreich. 2010. The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography. Cultural Anthropology 25 (4): 545–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knappett, C., and L. Malafouris, eds. 2008. Material Agency: Towards a Non-anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopnina, H., and E. Shoreman-Ouimet. 2015. Culture and Conservation: Beyond Anthropocentrism. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, J. 1987 [1979]. Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Gaia: The Practical Science of Planetary Medicine. London: Gaia Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, C. 2010. Viral Clouds: Becoming H5N1 in Indonesia. Cultural Anthropology 25 (4): 625–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, S. 2012. Virtual Water and Water Footprints. Global Supply and Production Chains and Their Impacts on Freshwater Resources. In People at the Well. Kinds, Usages and Meanings of Water in a Global Perspective, ed. P. Hahn, K. Cless, and J. Soentgen, 44–64. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A., and J. Law. 1994. Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology. Social Studies of Science 24 (4): 641–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noske, B. 1989. Humans and Other Animals. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Beyond Boundaries: Humans and Animals. Montreal/London: Black Rose.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels, P. 1998. The Spirit of Matter. On Fetish, Rarity, Fact and Fancy. In Border Fetishism. Material Objects in Unstable Spaces, ed. P. Spyer, 91–121. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crisis of Reason. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritvo, H. 1987. The Animal Estate: The English and Other Creatures in the Victorian Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F. Stuart Chapin, E. Lambin, T. Lenton, M. Scheffer, C. Folke, H. Schellnhuber, B. Nykvist, C. de Wit, T. Hughes, S. van der Leeuw, H. Rodhe, S. Sörlin, P. Snyder, R. Costanza, U. Svedin, M. Falkenmark, L. Karlberg, R. Corell, V. Fabry, J. Hansen, B. Walker, D. Liverman, K. Richardson, P. Crutzen, and J. Foley. 2009. A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature 461 (7263): 472–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpell, J. 1996. In the Company of Animals: A Study of Human-animal Relationships, Cambridge. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, V. 1998. The Strong Arm of the Law: Aboriginal Rangers and Anthropology. Australian Archaeology 47: 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. A happy Coincidence? Symbiosis and Synthesis in Anthropological and Indigenous Knowledges. Current Anthropology. 47 (6): 981–1008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Fluid Forms: Owning Water in Australia. In Ownership and Appropriation, ed. V. Strang and M. Busse, 171–195. Oxford/New York: ASA Monograph/Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014a. Lording It Over the Goddess: Water, Gender and Human-Environmental Relations. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 30 (1): 83–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014b. Fluid Consistencies: Meaning and Materiality in Human Engagements With Water. Archaeological Dialogues. Cambridge University Press 21 (2): 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016a. Infrastructural Relations: Water, Political Power and the Rise of a New ‘Despotic Regime’. Water Alternatives, Special Issue. Water, Infrastructure and Political Rule. 9 (2): 292–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016b. Justice for All: Inconvenient Truths and Reconciliation in Human-Non-Human Relations. In Major Works in Anthropology: Environmental Anthropology. Vol. 2, 263–278. London: Taylor and Francis. Reprinted from H. Kopnina and E. Shoreman-Ouimet, eds. 2016. Routledge International Handbook of Environmental Anthropology. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Re-imagined Communities: A New Ethical Approach to Water Policy. In The Oxford Handbook on Water Politics and Policy, ed. K. Conca and E. Weinthal. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, V., and S. Bell. 2013. Navigating Interdisciplinarity. Durham: Institute of Advanced Study, Durham University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, V., and T. McLeish. 2015. Evaluating Interdisciplinary Research: A Practical Guide. Durham: Durham University, Institute of Advanced Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. 1992. After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Sharing, Stealing and Borrowing Simultaneously. In Ownership and Appropriation, ed. V. Strang and M. Busse, 23–41. Oxford/New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A. 2004. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connections. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. In the Midst of Disturbance: Symbiosis, Coordination, History, Landscape. Firth Lecture, ASA Conference, Symbiotic Anthropologies: Theoretical Commensalities and Methodological Mutualisms, Exeter University, April 13–16, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernadsky, V. 1986 [1920]. The Biosphere. Santa Fe: Synergetic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weszkalnys, G., and T. Richardson, eds. 2014. Resource Materialities: New Anthropological Perspectives on Natural Resource Environments. Special Issue. Anthropological Quarterly 87 (1): 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future, The World Commission on Environment and Development, [The Brundtland Report]. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronica Strang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strang, V. (2017). The Gaia Complex: Ethical Challenges to an Anthropocentric ‘Common Future’. In: Brightman, M., Lewis, J. (eds) The Anthropology of Sustainability. Palgrave Studies in Anthropology of Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56636-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56636-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56635-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56636-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics