Leisure, Instrumentality and Communicative Action

  • Karl Spracklen
Chapter

Abstract

Habermas has continued the work of the Frankfurt School but also in many ways broke with it. In this chapter, his ideas about communicative and instrumental rationality as they relate to leisure are used, both in his work and in the work of Spracklen. In this new century of (post)modernity and technological progress, it is easy to think that leisure lives have become more meaningful and important. Leisure is claimed to be the space or activity in which we become human, find our Self and find belonging. There is an enormous range of literature that makes the case for contemporary leisure as a form that allows for meaningful human agency and human development, whether through the discipline of physical activity or the virtual communities of the internet. In this chapter, the opposite case is made: the lifeworld of leisure has been swamped by systems of global capitalism.

Keywords

Habermas Instrumentality Communicative action Capitalism Hegemony 

References

  1. Adorno, T. (1967). Prisms. London: Neville Spearman.Google Scholar
  2. Adorno, T. (1991). The culture industry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1992). Dialectic of enlightenment. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Bataille, G. (1985). The notion of expenditure. In G. Bataille (Ed.), Visions of excess: Selected writings, 1927–1939 (pp. 116–129). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Finlayson, J. (2004). Habermas: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action, volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  7. Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action, volume two: The critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  8. Habermas, J. (1988). Theory and practice. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  9. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  10. Habermas, J. (1990). The philosophical discourse of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Habermas, J. (1998). The inclusion of the other. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Habermas, J. (2000). Post-national constellation. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, J. (2002). Religion and rationality: Essays on reason, god, and modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  15. Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Habermas, J. (2008). Between naturalism and religion. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  17. Horkheimer, M. (2004). Eclipse of reason. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  18. Horster, D. (1992). Habermas: An introduction. Philadelphia: Pennbridge.Google Scholar
  19. Spracklen, K. (2006). Leisure, consumption and a blaze in the Northern Sky: Developing an understanding of leisure at the end of modernity through the Habermasian Framework of communicative and instrumental rationality. World Leisure Journal, 48(3), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Spracklen, K. (2009). The meaning and purpose of leisure: Habermas and leisure at the end of modernity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Spracklen, K. (2011). Constructing leisure: Historical and philosophical debates. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Spracklen, K. (2013). Whiteness and leisure. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spracklen, K. (2015). Digital leisure, the Internet and popular culture: Communities and identities in a digital age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Veblen, T. (1970). The theory of the leisure class. London: Unwin.Google Scholar
  25. Weber, M. (1964). Theory of social and economic organization. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl Spracklen
    • 1
  1. 1.Carnegie FacultyLeeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations