Skip to main content

The Communicative Setting of the Eurovision Song Contest

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language, Normativity and Europeanisation

Part of the book series: Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse ((PSDS))

Abstract

The ESC looks back on a history of 60 years in which the competition has grown to become a European institution in its own right. This status has also been officially recognised, as in 2016 the ESC received the Charlemagne Medal for its contribution to European unification and identity formation. Originally created by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU ) with the aim to re-unite the war -ridden Europe of the 1950s through a popular music television format, the event is today more popular than ever before and continues to be an important driving force for European integration and identity formation. The TV broadcast of the ESC 2015 had a market share of 39.6 % (in the youngest age group, 15–24 years, even of 44.8 %), with individual countries showing remarkably high viewing rates (85.6 % in Sweden [SWE] , 95.9 % in Iceland [ISL] ). In total, the contest attracted 197 million viewers. Audience segments show a roughly equal distribution across age, occupational and social-class groups (Le Guern 2000). This makes the ESC a powerful device to unite not just people from various cultures but also from diverse social backgrounds in an endeavour to celebrate Europe. Especially since the implementation of public televoting in 1997, the popular culture mediated access to European identity formation of the ESC can be seen to possess a strong bottom-up, affectively anchored element (see e.g. Zaroulia 2013), which contrasts markedly with the top-down approach to Europeanisation embodied by the EU .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Detailed (non-academic) overviews of ESC history can be found in O’Connor (2005, 2015) and West (2015).

  2. 2.

    See http://www.eurovision.tv/page/news?id=eurovision_song_contest_to_receive_charlemagne_medal (accessed 18 March 2016).

  3. 3.

    In GER , for example, the ESC 2011 was awarded the German Television Prize in the category “Best Entertainment Show”.

  4. 4.

    Source: http://www.eurovision.tv/page/news?id=nearly_200_million_people_watch_eurovision_2015 (accessed 23 September 2015).

  5. 5.

    Televoting was first tested at the ESC 1997 but involved only a handful of countries: AUT , GER , SUI , SWE and the UK .

  6. 6.

    “Germany ” up to 1989 equals former West Germany.

  7. 7.

    BLR is not a member of the Council of Europe; ISR only has observer status. Liechtenstein has never participated in the ESC, but is a member of the Council of Europe. Other Council of Europe members (AND, LUX, MON) have not participated in the ESC for a longer time.

  8. 8.

    This voting scene can be watched here (minutes 1.30–1.50): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGFBzpdkhTk (accessed 23 September 2015). SEM did not send an entry to the ESC 2006 because the Serbian and Montenegrin delegations were not able to agree on a representative. The country withdrew a few weeks before the contest but nevertheless broadcast it and was allowed to vote .

  9. 9.

    The complete top 20 can be found here: http://www.esctoday.com/news/read/5531 (accessed 4 November 2011).

  10. 10.

    Link to the performance in the Georgian preselection 2009: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRXHFMPkcfk (accessed 23 September 2015).

  11. 11.

    This scene can be watched here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeU17jst9No&feature=related (accessed 23 September 2015).

  12. 12.

    For example, of the 43 countries participating in 2011, 18 were not EU members: ALB , ARM , AZE , BLR , BOS , CRO , GEO , ISL , ISR , MAC , MOL , NOR , RUS , SAN , SER , SUI , TUR , UKR .

  13. 13.

    The two versions of the lyrics can be found here: http://www.diggiloo.net/?2005ua11 (Ukrainian version); http://www.diggiloo.net/?2005ua (multilingual version as performed in the ESC) (accessed 23 September 2015).

  14. 14.

    The conflict between Israelis and Palestinians was topicalised in the ESC by the performance ISR 2009 (Noa & Mira Awad— “There must be another way (Einaich)”), which was sung in Hebrew , Arabic and English (see also Belkind 2010).

  15. 15.

    Jordan even announced BEL as the official winner of the ESC the next day and claimed that it had to stop the transmission due to technical difficulties.

  16. 16.

    The Cypriot ESC songs are generally chosen by the Greek broadcasting station on the island, which is a member of the EBU , and they were sung in Greek up to the year 2000. CYP has been experimenting with quite a few languages in the ESC since then, but Turkish was not among them.

  17. 17.

    Link to this voting scene: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGFBzpdkhTk (see minute 8.20–9.49; accessed 23 September 2015).

  18. 18.

    Yoiking is a “singing style used by the Saami to communicate to the animals of their herding culture, now symbolic of the distinctiveness of Saami culture” (Bohlman 2004b: 362).

  19. 19.

    Women conducted the ESC orchestra only on four occasions: Monique Dominique (SWE 1983), Nurit Hirsh (ISR 1973, ISR 1978) and Anita Kerr (SUI 1985).

  20. 20.

    MAC ’s rank 5 in the 1990s is based on one participation only and therefore negligible. However, there may be a linguistic dimension to this because Macedonian was not used on the ESC stage until 1998, whereas “Serbo-Croatian ” and Slovenian were already heard during the years of YUG ’s participation. In this book, the term “Serbo-Croatian” will be used when referring to the times of YUG or when such a variety is used by a nation other than BOS, CRO, MNT and SER. Post-Yugoslav uses of such varieties by these four countries are labelled Bosnian, Croatian, Montenegrin and Serbian, respectively.

  21. 21.

    MAL did not participate in the 1980s.

  22. 22.

    For studies dealing with the question of potential voting biases in the ESC, see, for example, Ginsburgh and Noury (2008) or Spierdijk and Vellekoop (2009).

References

  • Allatson, Paul. 2007. ‘Antes cursi que sencilla’. Eurovision Song Contests and the kitsch-drive to Euro-unity. Culture, Theory & Critique 48(1): 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arntsen, Hilde. 2005. Staging the nation? Nation, myth and cultural stereotypes in the international Eurovision Song Contest finals in Estonia, Latvia and Norway. In The Baltic media world, ed. Richard Bærug, 145–157. Riga: Flera Printing-House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aston, Elaine. 2013. Competing femininities: A girl for Eurovision. In Performing the ‘New’ Europe: Identities, feelings and politics in the Eurovision Song Contest, ed. Karen Fricker and Milija Gluhovic, 163–177. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Maximilian. 2015. Die Song-Contest-Fangemeinde in Österreich: Eine Analyse. In Eurovision Song Contest: Eine kleine Geschichte zwischen Körper, Geschlecht und Nation, ed. Christine Ehardt, Georg Vogt, and Florian Wagner, 283–295. Wien: Zaglossus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belkind, Nili. 2010. A message for peace or a tool for oppression? Israeli Jewish-Arab duo Achinoam Nini and Mira Awad’s representation of Israel at Eurovision 2009. Current Musicology 89: 7–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlman, Philip V. 2004a. Popular music on the stage of a United Europe—Southeastern Europe in the ‘Eurovision Song Contest’. In United Europe—United music? Diversity and social dimensions in Central and Southeastern Europe, ed. Bruno B. Reuer, 55–73. Berlin: Weidler.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2004b. The music of European nationalism. Cultural identity and modern history. Santa Barbara: ABC Clio.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2011. Music, nationalism, and the making of the new Europe. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2010. Locating identity in language. In Language and identities, ed. Carmen Llamas and Dominic Watt, 18–28. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carniel, Jessica. 2015. Skirting the issue: Finding queer and geopolitical belonging at the Eurovision Song Contest. Contemporary Southeastern Europe 2(1): 136–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassiday, Julie A. 2014. Post-Soviet pop goes gay: Russia’s trajectory to Eurovision victory. Russian Review 73(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Broadcasting Union [EBU]. 2010. Rules for the Eurovision Song Contest 2010. http://www.eurovision.tv/upload/esc2010rules.pdf. Accessed 23 Sept 2015.

  • Fornäs, Johan. 2012. Signifying Europe. Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, Karen. 2008. The Eurovision Song Contest: Kitsch or Camp? Paper presented at the Singing Europe Conference, Volos (1 March 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. ‘It’s just not funny any more’: Terry Wogan, melancholy Britain and the Eurovision Song Contest. In Performing the ‘New’ Europe: Identities, feelings and politics in the Eurovision Song Contest, ed. Karen Fricker and Milija Gluhovic, 53–76. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, Karen, Elena Moreo, and Brian Singleton. 2007. Part of the show. The global networking of Irish Eurovision Song Contest fans. In Performing global networks, ed. Karen Fricker and Ronit Lentin, 139–162. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, Susan. 2006. Migration, minorities and multilingualism. Language ideologies in Europe. In Language ideologies, policies and practices. Language and the future of Europe, ed. Clare Mar-Molinero and Patrick Stevenson, 13–27. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburgh, Victor, and Abdul G. Noury. 2008. The Eurovision Song Contest. Is voting political or cultural? European Journal of Political Economy 24(1): 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, Dana. 2007a. ‘Russian body and soul’. t.A.T.u performs at Eurovision 2003. In A song for Europe. Popular music and politics in the Eurovision Song Contest, ed. Ivan Raykoff and Robert Deam Tobin, 111–121. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Phil. 2006. Eurovision fandom as lived experience. Diegesis: Journal of the Association for Research in Popular Fiction 9: 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Emily D. 2014. A new song for a new motherland: Eurovision and the rhetoric of post-Soviet national identity. Russian Review 73(1): 24–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, Barbara. 2010. Locating language in identity. In Language and identities, ed. Carmen Llamas and Dominic Watt, 29–36. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerton, Sarah. 2006. Too much, Tatu young. Queering politics in the world of Tatu. In Queering the popular pitch, ed. Sheila Whiteley and Jennifer Rycenga, 155–167. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Guern, Philippe. 2000. From National pride to Global Kitsch. The Eurovision Song Contest. http://wjfms.ncl.ac.uk/leguWJ.htm. Accessed 23 Sept 2015.

  • Lemish, Dafna. 2004. ‘My kind of campfire’. The Eurovision Song Contest and Israeli gay men. Journal of Popular Communication 2(1): 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. International, Dana. In Routledge international encyclopedia of queer culture, ed. David A. Gerstner, 303. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Gay brotherhood. Israeli gay men and the Eurovision Song Contest. In A song for Europe. Popular music and politics in the Eurovision Song Contest, ed. Ivan Raykoff and Robert Deam Tobin, 123–134. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meerzon, Yana, and Dmitri Priven. 2013. Back to the future: Imagining a new Russia at the Eurovision Song Contest. In Performing the ‘New’ Europe: Identities, feelings and politics in the Eurovision Song Contest, ed. Karen Fricker and Milija Gluhovic, 111–124. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moriel, Liora. 1998. Diva in the promised land. A blueprint for newspeak? World Englishes 17(2): 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, Heinz. 1999. Twelve points. Grand Prix Eurovision—Analyse einer Fankultur. Zürich: Pestalozzianum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2012b. Negotiating sexual desire at the Eurovision Song Contest. On the verge of homonormativity? In Let’s talk about (texts about) sex. Sex and language, ed. Marietta Calderón and Georg Marko, 287–299. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. ‘Now everybody can wear a skirt’. Linguistic constructions of non-heteronormativity at Eurovision Song Contest press conferences. Discourse & Society 24(5): 590–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nic Craith, Máiréad. 2006. Europe and the politics of language. Citizens, migrants and outsiders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, John Kennedy. 2005. Eurovision Song Contest. Das offizielle Buch zu 50 Jahren europäischer Popgeschichte. Bilder, Fakten, Unterhaltung. Bindlach: Gondrom.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. The Eurovision Song Contest: The official celebration. London: Carlton Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, Elinor. 1992. Indexing gender. In Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon, ed. Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajala, Mari. 2007a. Finlande: Zero points? Der Eurovision Song Contest in den finnischen Medien. Köln: Saxa.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007b. Closeting Eurovision. Heteronormativity in the Finnish national television. SQS 2(2): 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulain, Michel. 2008. European migration statistics. Definitions, data and challenges. In Mapping linguistic diversity in multicultural contexts, ed. Monica Barni and Guus Extra, 43–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehberg, Peter. 2007. Winning failure. Queer nationality at the Eurovision Song Contest. SQS 2(2): 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehberg, Peter, and Mikko Tuhkanen. 2007. Danzing time. Dissociative camp and European synchrony. SQS 2(2): 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, Thomas. 2010. A community of Europeans? Transnational identities and public spheres. London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheller-Boltz, Dennis. 2015. ‘The victory of Conchita Wurst is the end of Europe!’ – or: Blue Europe vs Black-White Russia: Constructing nation by constructing gender and sexuality in Russian discourse. In New approaches to gender and queer research in Slavonic studies, ed. Dennis Scheller-Boltz, 201–241. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, Brian, Karen Fricker, and Elena Moreo. 2007. Performing the queer network. Fans and families at the Eurovision Song Contest. SQS 2(2): 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spierdijk, Laura, and Michel Vellekoop. 2009. The structure of bias in peer voting systems. Lessons from the Eurovision Song Contest. Empirical Economics 36(2): 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedenburg, Ted. 1997. Saida Sultan/Danna International. Transgender pop and the polysemiotics of sex, nation, and ethnicity on the Israeli-Egyptian border. Musical Quarterly 81: 81–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szeman, Ioana. 2013. ‘Playing with fire’, and playing it safe: With(out) Roma at the Eurovision Song Contest? In Performing the ‘New’ Europe: Identities, feelings and politics in the Eurovision Song Contest, ed. Karen Fricker and Milija Gluhovic, 125–141. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vänskä, Annamari. 2007. Bespectacular and over the top. On the genealogy of lesbian camp. SQS 2(2): 66–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuletic, Dean. 2015. Das Lied des Machthabers: Autoritäre Staaten beim Eurovision Song Contest. In Eurovision Song Contest: Eine kleine Geschichte zwischen Körper, Geschlecht und Nation, ed. Christine Ehardt, Georg Vogt, and Florian Wagner, 93–110. Wien: Zaglossus.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Chris. 2015. Hello Europe! How a song contest shaped the face of a continent. London: CWTK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedlack, Maria Katharina, and Masha Neufeld. 2015. Taнцуй Eвpoпa и плaчь Poccия? Der Eurovision Song Contest 2014—Krieg der Kulturen zwischen Ost und West? In Eurovision Song Contest: Eine kleine Geschichte zwischen Körper, Geschlecht und Nation, ed. Christine Ehardt, Georg Vogt, and Florian Wagner, 149–167. Wien: Zaglossus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolther, Irving. 2001. The Eurovision Song Contest—A study on a music-focused fan culture. In Musik im Alltag. Sozialpsychologie der Musik, ed. Claudia Bullerjahn, 55–57. Hannover: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Musikpsychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaroulia, Marilena. 2013. ‘Sharing the moment’: Europe, affect and utopian performatives in the Eurovision Song Contest. In Performing the ‘New’ Europe: Identities, feelings and politics in the Eurovision Song Contest, ed. Karen Fricker and Milija Gluhovic, 31–52. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Motschenbacher, H. (2016). The Communicative Setting of the Eurovision Song Contest. In: Language, Normativity and Europeanisation. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56301-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56301-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56300-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56301-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics