Skip to main content

United Kingdom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In 2003, Julia Pemberton and her son, William, were murdered by her estranged husband. This crime revealed a disturbing lack of preparedness on the part of the police and resulted in sustained campaigning for accountability on the part of Julia’s family. This case, which will be discussed in more detail later in this chapter, formed the main stimulus for the adoption of Domestic Homicide Reviews (DHRs) within the United Kingdom. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the prevalence and nature of domestic homicide in the United Kingdom, and the systems in place to respond to domestic abuse. We also explore the development and operation of DHRs, including a summary of emergent themes, and conclude by sketching potential directions for their improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The United Kingdom refers to the union of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. In addition to the UK government, the devolved governments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland make their own laws and policies. Statistics produced by the UK government via the Home Office typically refer to England and Wales only (e.g., ONS 2015b); however, we will also include information about Scotland and Northern Ireland in this chapter where possible.

  2. 2.

    The UK Home Office have produced revised guidelines on conducting DHRs in December 2016, after this chapter was written. These new guidelines make several changes to the process of conducting a DHR in the UK, with a focus upon increasing participation and raising standards. They can be found at this link: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/575273/DHR-Statutory-Guidance-161206.pdf

  3. 3.

    In the United Kingdom there is no specific criminal offence for ‘domestic violence’; instead, existing criminal offences (e.g., common assault, harassment) are applied to fit the circumstances of each case. Because it is not defined in criminal law, an official governmental definition is used: ‘any incident or pattern of incidents of controlling, coercive, threatening behaviour, violence or abuse between those aged 16 or over who are, or have been, intimate partners or family members regardless of gender or sexuality’ (Home Office 2013a).

  4. 4.

    http://www.safelives.org.uk/node/467

  5. 5.

    The House of Lords is the second chamber of the UK Parliament.

  6. 6.

    https://www.ipcc.gov.uk/page/referral

  7. 7.

    ‘Vulnerable adult’ is defined as a person ‘who is or may be in need of community care services by reason of mental or other disability, age or illness; and who is or may be unable to take care of him or herself, or unable to protect him or herself against significant harm or exploitation’ (Her Majesty’s Stationery Office 1997).

  8. 8.

    http://www.scie.org.uk

  9. 9.

    http://www.aafda.org.uk

  10. 10.

    These convictions were obtained under ‘joint enterprise’ legislation, which is normally used to prosecute perpetrators of gang-related violence.

  11. 11.

    www.ikwro.org.uk

  12. 12.

    Available to view on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VepuyvhHYdM

  13. 13.

    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/conducting-a-domestic-homicide-review-online-learning

References

  • Adams, F. (2005) ‘The Family No One Could Save’, The Guardian (7 June 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bent-Goodley, T. B. (2013) ‘Domestic Violence Fatality Reviews and the African American Community’. Homicide Studies, Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, M., Belderson, P., & Bailey, S. (2014) Improving the Quality of Serious Case Reviews Through Support and Training: Independent Evaluation (Norwich: Centre for Research on Children & Families, University of East Anglia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookman, F. (2005) Understanding Homicide (London; Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookman, F. (2010) ‘Homicide’. In F. Brookman, M. Maguire, & H. Pierpoint (eds) Handbook on Crime (Cullompton, UK; Portland, OR: Willan). 217–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookman, F. (2015) ‘Killer Decisions: The Role of Cognition, Affect and “Expertise” in Homicide’. Aggression and Violent Behavior, Vol. 20, pp. 42–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookman, F., & Innes, M. (2013) ‘The Problem of Success: What Is a “Good” Homicide Investigation?’. Policing and Society, Vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 292–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookman, F., Jones, H., & Pike, S. (in press) ‘Homicide in Britain’. In F. Brookman, E. Maguire, & M. Maguire (eds) Handbook on Homicide (London: Wiley Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, D. (2013) Investigation into the Actions of Gwent Police in Dealing with a Report of Criminal Damage by Ms Kim Buckley on 29 August 2012 (London: IPCC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugeja, L., Dawson, M., McIntyre, S.-J., & Walsh, C. (2015) ‘Domestic/Family Violence Death Reviews: An International Comparison’. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, Vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, M. (2008) Legal Responses to Domestic Violence (Abingdon, OX; New York: Routledge-Cavendish).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, M. (2009) ‘Failing to Protect: Victims’ Rights and Police Liability’. The Modern Law Review, Vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, C. (2014) Domestic Homicide Review Report: Mr F N (Leicester: Leicestershire Safer Communities Strategy Board).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D., Burton, M., Robinson, A. L., & Vallely, C. (2004) Evaluation of Specialist Domestic Violence Courts/Fast Track Systems. (London: Crown Prosecution Service). Available at https://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/docs/specialistdvcourts.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, S. (2013) Maria Stubbings (Deceased) Investigation Concerning the Actions of Essex Police in 2008 (London: IPCC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Devries, K., Watts, C., Yoshihama, M., Kiss, L., Schraiber, L. B., Deyessa, N., Heise, L., Durand, J., Mbwambo, J., Jansen, H., Berhane, Y., Ellsberg, M., & Garcia-Moreno, C. WHO Multi-Country Study Team (2011) ‘Violence against Women Is Strongly Associated with Suicide Attempts: Evidence from the WHO Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence against Women’. Social Science & Medicine (1982), Vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (2015) When Men Murder Women (Oxford; New York: OUP USA).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (2016) ‘Contacts with the Police and Other Agencies Across the Life-Course of Men Who Murder an Intimate Woman Partner’. Policing, Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 408–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfield, R. (2003) ‘Exposure Reduction or Retaliation? The Effects of Domestic Violence Resources on Intimate-Partner Homicide’. Law & Society Review, Vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J., Newburn, T., & Souhami, A. (2005) Assessing the Impact of the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry (London: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. K. (2008) ‘MPS “Could Have Done More” to Prevent the Murder of Banaz Mahmod’. Safe – The Domestic Abuse Quarterly, Vol. Summer, pp. 24–25. Available at https://theprg.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/ipcc-inquiry-comments_safe-journal_summer-20082.pdf.

  • Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. (1997) No Secrets: Guidance on Developing and Implementing Multi-Agency Politics and Procedures to Protect Vulnerable Adults from Abuse (London: Lord Chancellor’s Department).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester, M. (2013) ‘Who Does What to Whom? Gender and Domestic Violence Perpetrators in English Police Records’. European Journal of Criminology, Vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 623–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, M. H.-R., & Bhugra, D. (2003) ‘Perceived Causes of Suicide Attempts by U.K. South Asian Women’. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 455–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HMIC. (2014) Everyone’s Business: Improving the Police Response to Domestic Abuse (London: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of the Constabulary).

    Google Scholar 

  • HMIC. (2015) The Depths of Dishonour: Hidden Voices and Shameful Crimes (London: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of the Constabulary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Affairs Committee. (2013) Eleventh Report: Independent Police Complaints Commission (London: Houses of Parliament).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2011) Criteria for Considering Domestic Homicide Review Reports (London: Home Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2013a) Circular: New Government Domestic Violence and Abuse Definition – Publications – GOV.UK. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/new-government-domestic-violence-and-abuse-definition.

  • Home Office. (2013b) Multi-Agency Statutory Guidance for the Conduct of Domestic Homicide Reviews – Revised (London: Home Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2013c) Domestic Homicide Reviews: Common Themes Identified as Lessons to Be Learned (London: Home Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, P. G., Dawson, M., & Campbell, M. (2013) ‘Developing a National Collaborative Approach to Prevent Domestic Homicides: Domestic Homicide Review Committees’. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (2011) ‘Miscarriages of Justice: The Role of Homicide Review’. Medicine, Science, and the Law, Vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 63–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laming, W. H. (2003) The Victoria Climbié Inquiry (London: The Stationery Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd-Evans, M. (2014) ‘Domestic Homicide Reviews’. The Journal of Homicide and Major Incident Investigation, Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 55–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matczak, A., Hatidimitriadou, E., & Lindsay, J. (2011) Review of Domestic Violence Policies in England and Wales (London: Kingston University and St George’s, University of London).

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, M., & Ni Aoláin, F. (2014) Advancing Gender Equality in Northern Ireland: Addressing Domestic Violence and Human Rights Protections for Women (Belfast: Northern Ireland Assembly).

    Google Scholar 

  • Monckton-Smith, J., Williams, A., & Mullane, F. (2014) Domestic Abuse, Homicide and Gender: Strategies for Policy and Practice (Basingstoke: AIAA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2011) Munro Review of Child Protection: A Child-Centred System. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/munro-review-of-child-protection-final-report-a-child-centred-system.

  • NICE. (2014) Domestic Violence and Abuse: Multi-Agency Working |Guidance and Guidelines |NICE. Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph50.

  • Nicholson, J., & Kidd, C. (2015) Review of the Independent Investigation into Derbyshire Constabulary Contact with Rachael and Auden Slack, and Andrew Cairns, prior to Their Deaths (London: IPCC).

    Google Scholar 

  • ONS. (2015a) Crime Statistics: Focus on Violent Crime and Sexual Offences 2013/2014 (London: Office for National Statistics).

    Google Scholar 

  • ONS. (2015b) Crime in England and Wales – Office for National Statistics. Available at http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingdecember2015.

  • ONS. (2016) Crime Statistics: Focus on Violent Crime and Sexual Offences: Year ending March 2015 (London: Office for National Statistics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Payton, J. L. (2014) ‘“Honor,” Collectivity, and Agnation: Emerging Risk Factors in “Honor”-Based Violence’. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 29, no. 16, pp. 2863–2883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peelo, M., Francis, B., Soothill, K., Pearson, J., & Ackerley, E. (2004) ‘Newspaper Reporting and the Public Construction of Homicide’. British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 256–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickles, J. (2014) Executive Summary: Domestic Homicide Review into the Death of Mrs Sharon B (Pontypool: Torfaen County Borough Council).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pobutsky, A., Brown, M., Nakao, L., & Reyes-Salvail, F. (2014) ‘Results from the Hawaii Domestic Violence Fatality Review, 2000–2009’. Journal of Injury & Violence Research, Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raleigh, V. S. (2009) ‘Suicide Rates in People of South Asian Origin in England and Wales’. The British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 194, no. 6, pp. 567–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid Meloy, J., Hoffmann, J., Guldimann, A., & James, D. (2012) ‘The Role of Warning Behaviors in Threat Assessment: An Exploration and Suggested Typology’. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, Vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 256–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1996) ‘Predicting the Recidivism of Mentally Disordered Firesetters’. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 364–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A., & Payton, J. (2016) ‘Independent Advocacy and Multiagency Responses to Domestic Violence’. In S. Hilder & V. Bettinson (eds) Domestic Violence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Protection, Prevention and Intervention (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. L. (2006) ‘Reducing Repeat Victimization Among High-Risk Victims of Domestic Violence The Benefits of a Coordinated Community Response in Cardiff, Wales’. Violence Against Women, Vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 761–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. L. (2010) ‘Risk and Intimate Partner Violence’. In H. Kemshall & B. Wilkinson (eds.) Good Practice in Risk Assessment and Risk Management (3rd Ed.) (London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers). 119–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. L., Myhill, A., Wire, J., Tilley, N., & Roberts, J. (2016) Police Training Reference: Risk-Led Policing of Domestic Abuse and the DASH Tool (London: College of Policing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, M. (2014) ‘Multi-Perpetrator Domestic Violence’. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, Vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scranton, P. (2015) ‘Policed by Consent: The Myth and the Betrayal’. In D. Whyte (ed) How Corrupt is Britain? (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, B. E., Murphy, S. B., Moynihan, M. M., Dudley-Fennessey, E., & Stapleton, J. G. (2015) ‘Intimate Partner Homicide New Insights for Understanding Lethality and Risks’. Violence Against Women, Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., Osborne, S., Lau, I., & Britton, A. (2012) Homicides, Firearm Offences and Intimate Violence 2010/11: Supplementary Volume 2 to Crime in England and Wales 2010/11 (London: Home Office).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, D. (2015) Serious Case Review: Executive Summary of the Overview Report of the Circumstances Concerning Chelsey (Dob 13.12.1994) and Mary (Dob 10.03.2012) Who Both Died in a House Fire on 18.09.2012 (South East Wales: South East Wales Safeguarding Children Board).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns, J., & Jenkins, L. (2012) All In This Together?: Interrogating U.K. ‘Austerity’ through Gender Lenses (University of Birmingham: Symposium on the Gender Impacts of U.K. Austerity Measures).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöckl, H., Devries, K., Rotstein, A., Abrahams, N., Campbell, J., Watts, C., & Moreno, C. G. (2013) ‘The Global Prevalence of Intimate Partner Homicide: A Systematic Review’. Lancet (London, England), Vol. 382, no. 9895, pp. 859–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storer, H. L., Lindhorst, T., & Starr, K. (2013) ‘The Domestic Violence Fatality Review Can It Mobilize Community-Level Change?’. Homicide Studies, Vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 418–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Scottish Government. (2015) Homicide in Scotland 2014–2015 (Edinburgh: The Scottish Government).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiara, R. K., & Gill, A. K. (eds) (2009) Violence Against Women in South Asian Communities: Issues for Policy and Practice (London; Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. (2012) Mr Michael Atherton: IPCC Investigation into the Granting, Management and Review of His Shotgun Certificate and Firearm Licence by Durham Constabulary (London: IPCC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, S. (2014) ‘Child Death Review Processes: A Six-Country Comparison’. Child Abuse Review, Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 116–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (2004) The Cost of Domestic Violence (London: Women & Equality Unit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C., & Starmer, K. (1999) Miscarriages of Justice: A Review of Justice in Error (London: Blackstone Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M., McGlade, M., & Gamble, J. (2008) A Domestic Homicide Review into the Deaths of Julia and William Pemberton (Newbury: West Berkshire Safer Communities Partnership).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S. (2008) ‘What Is to Be Done About Violence Against Women? Gender, Violence, Cosmopolitanism and the Law’. British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. (2015) Executive Summary of the Overview Report into the Death of Pritam (Gloucester: Gloucestershire Safer & Stronger Communities Strategic Partnership).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westmarland, N. (2015) Violence against Women: Criminological Perspectives on Men’s Violences (London; New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. S., & Websdale, N. (2006) ‘Domestic Violence Fatality Review Teams: An Interprofessional Model to Reduce Deaths’. Journal of Interprofessional Care, Vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 535–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanne Payton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Payton, J., Robinson, A., Brookman, F. (2017). United Kingdom. In: Dawson, M. (eds) Domestic Homicides and Death Reviews. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56276-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56276-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56275-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-56276-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics