Skip to main content

Affective Contagion on the Early Modern Stage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism ((PSATLC))

Abstract

Tribble examines the concept of “affective transmission” as it was understood both by early modern writers and by contemporary affect theorists. She argues that contemporary models that place more stress upon the interplay between affect and cognition hold promise for understanding the affective practices of the early modern stage, especially the negotiations between the skilled player and the canny playgoer. These points are supported by an analysis of the playgoing environment of both the early modern stage and reconstructed stages such as Shakespeare’s Globe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Arab, Ronda, Michelle M. Dowd, and Adam Zucker. Historical Affects and the Early Modern Theatre. New York: Routledge, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsade, S. G. “The Ripple Effect: Emotional Contagion and Its Influence on Group Behavior.” Administrative Science Quarterly 47, no. 4 (2002): 644–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, Lisa. “Feeling F.I.N.E.: Social Psychology, Suggestion and the Problem of Social Influence.” International Journal of Critical Psychology 27 (2007): 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Teresa. The Transmission of Affect. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Andy. “Embodied, Extended, and Embedded Cognition.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Science, edited by Keith Frankish and William Ramsey, 275–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombetti, Giovanna. The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, Thomas. The Gull’s Hornbook. London, 1609, sig. E3v.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Thomas. “ ‘Emotion’: The History of a Keyword in Crisis.” Emotion Review 4, no. 4 (2012): 338–344. doi:10.1177/1754073912445814.

  • Froese, Tom. “Enactive Neuroscience, the Direct Perception Hypothesis, and the Socially Extended Mind: Response to Precis on The Cognitive Emotional Brain.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Shaun. How the Body Shapes the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosson, Stephen. Playes Confuted in Five Actions. London, 1582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, Melissa and Gregory J. Seigworth, eds. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonson, Ben. Bartholomew Faire. In The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson, edited by David Bevington, Martin Butler and Ian Donaldson. Vol 4, 253–428. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, Donald. “Distracting Othello: Tragedy and the Rise of Magic.” PMLA 129, no. 4 (2014): 649–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Arlie. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiverstein, Julian and Mark Miller. “The Cognitive-Emotional Brain Is an Embodied and Social Brain.” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 38 (2015): 26–28. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X14000922.

  • Leys, Ruth. “The Turn to Affect: A Critique.” Critical Inquiry 37 (2011): 434–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, Joseph. “Base Trade: Theatre as Prostitution.” ELH 60, no. 4 (1993): 833–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macknik, Stephen L., Susana Martinez-Conde, and Sandra Blakeslee, Sleights of Mind: What the Neuroscience of Magic Reveals About Our Everyday Deceptions. Macmillan, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, Brian. Parables for the Virtual: Movements, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The Autonomy of Affect.” In Deleuze: A Critical Reader, edited by P. Patton, 217–239. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, William. Keeping Together in Time: Dance and Drill in Human History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullaney, Steven. The Reformation of Emotions in the Age of Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paster, Gail Kern. Humoring the Body: Emotions and the Shakespearean Stage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, Luiz. “Precis on The Cognitive-Emotional Brain.” Behavioural and Brain Sciences 38 (2015): 1–66. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X14000922.

  • Phillips-Silver, Jessica C., Athena Aktipis, and Gregory A. Bryant, “The Ecology of Entrainment: Foundations of Coordinated Rhythmic Movement.” Music Perception 28, no. 1 (2010): 3–14. doi:10.1525/mp.2010.28.1.3.

  • Prescott, Paul. “Inheriting the Globe: The Reception of Shakespearean Space and Audience in Contemporary Reviewing.” In A Companion to Shakespeare and Performance, edited by Barbara Hodgdon and W. B. Worthen, 359–337. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, Joseph R. The Player’s Passion: Studies in the Science of Acting. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakespeare, William. Julius Caesar, edited by David Daniell. In The Arden Shakespeare Complete Works edited by Richard Proudfoot, Ann Thompson, and David Scott Kastan. London: Bloomsbury, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, Robert. “Connecting the Globe: Actors, Audiences, and Entrainment.” Shakespeare Survey 68 (2015): 295–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Bruce. Phenomenal Shakespeare. New York: Wiley, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. Tyson . “Passion Work: The Joint Production of Emotional Labor in Professional Wrestling.” Social Psychology Quarterly 71, no. 2 (2008): 157–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steggle, Matthew. Laughing and Weeping in Early Modern Theatres. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbes, Philip. Anatomie of Abuses. London, 1583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, Nigel. Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. New York: Routledge, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Still Life in Nearly Present Time: The Object of Nature.” Body and Society 6, no. 3/4 (2002): 34–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, Margaret. Affect and Emotion: A New Social Science Understanding. London: Sage, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. S. “ ‘False Friends’: Affective Semantics in Shakespeare.” Shakespeare 8, no. 3 (2012): 286–299. doi:10.1080/17450918.2012.696277.

  • Wickham, Glynne and Herbert Berry. English Professional Theatre, 1530–1660. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, Penelope. “Skilful Spectatorship? Doing (or Being) Audience at Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre.” Shakespeare Studies 43 (2015): 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerilli, Linda. “The Turn to Affect and the Problem of Judgment.” New Literary History 46, no. 2 (2015): 261–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evelyn Tribble .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tribble, E. (2017). Affective Contagion on the Early Modern Stage. In: Bailey, A., DiGangi, M. (eds) Affect Theory and Early Modern Texts. Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56126-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics