The Socio-symbolic Construction and Social Representation of Community

  • Kenneth C. Bessant
Chapter

Abstract

The expanding interest in social constructionist, symbolic, and representational approaches reflects a shift in emphasis away from narrowly framed pre-given, structural conceptions of community. In general constructionist terms, community can be viewed as a social product of meaning-making processes that endow it with obdurate social reality. Recent discussions of relational constructionism focus on the role of language and discursive practices in the continuous (trans)formation of relatively fluid and contingent local realities. Also, community can be thought of as a collectively built narrative or symbolically constructed representation “in the mind.” This chapter explores the idea that community is a discursively constituted socio-symbolic construction that is talked and acted into existence in and through everyday lived relation.

References

  1. Alkon, A. H., & Traugot, M. (2008). Place matters, but how? Rural identity, environmental decision making, and the social construction of place. City & Community, 7, 97–112.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2008.00248.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, R. L. (1999). The socio-spatial making and marking of “us”: Toward a critical postmodern spatial theory of difference and community. Social Identities, 5, 249–277.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504639951482 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Rev. ed.). London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Ed. and Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1963).Google Scholar
  5. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds. and V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1979).Google Scholar
  6. Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (V. Liapunov & M. Holquist, Eds. and V. Liapunov, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. (Original work published 1986).Google Scholar
  7. Berger, P. L. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York, NY: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bessant, K. C. (2014). The relational genesis of community: Self-other dialogue. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24, 467–478.  https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2185 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Borch, C. (2002). Interview with Edward W. Soja: Thirdspace, postmetropolis, and social theory. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 3, 113–120.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2002.9672816 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bouchard, M. (2004). A critical reappraisal of the concept of the “Imagined Community” and the presumed sacred languages of the medieval period. National Identities, 6, 3–24.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1460894042000216481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buber, M. (1965). The knowledge of man: A philosophy of the interhuman (M. Friedman, Ed. and M. Friedman & R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Chia, R. (1995). From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 16, 579–604.  https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chia, R. (1999). A “rhizomic” model of organizational change and transformation: Perspective from a metaphysics of change. British Journal of Management, 10, 209–227.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, A. P. (1985). The symbolic construction of community. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, A. P. (2002). Epilogue. In V. Amit (Ed.), Realizing community: Concepts, social relationships and sentiments (pp. 165–170). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Colombo, M., & Senatore, A. (2005). The discursive construction of community identity. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 15, 48–62.  https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.809 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cronick, K. (2002). Community, subjectivity, and intersubjectivity. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 529–546.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015860002096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daanen, P. (2009). Conscious and non-conscious representation in social representations theory: Social representations from the phenomenological point of view. Culture & Psychology, 15, 372–385.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X09343704 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Day, G. (1998). A community of communities? Similarity and difference in Welsh rural community studies. The Economic and Social Review, 29, 233–257. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2262/64150 Google Scholar
  22. Day, G. (2006). Community and everyday life. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Delanty, G. (2003). Community. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Dicken, P., Kelly, P. F., Olds, K., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2001). Chains and networks, territories and scales: Towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy. Global Networks, 1, 89–112.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0374.00007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Durkheim, É. (1938). The rules of sociological method (G. E. G. Catlin, Ed. and S. A. Solovay & J. M. Mueller, Trans.). New York, NY: The Free Press. (Original work published 1895).Google Scholar
  26. Farr, R. M. (1998). From collective to social representations: Aller et retour. Culture & Psychology, 4, 275–296.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9800400301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flick, U. (1994). Social representations and the social construction of everyday knowledge: Theoretical and methodological queries. Social Science Information, 33, 179–197.  https://doi.org/10.1177/053901894033002003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces (J. Miskowiec, Trans.) Diacritics, 16, 22–27. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/464648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  30. Gleicher, D. (2011). Social action, dialogism and the imaginary community: Toward a dialogical critique of political economy. Social Semiotics, 21, 381–398.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2011.564387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gray, J. (2002). Community as place-making: Ram auctions in the Scottish borderland. In V. Amit (Ed.), Realizing community: Concepts, social relationships and sentiments (pp. 38–59). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Gusfield, J. R. (1975). Community: A critical response. New York, NY: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
  33. Halfacree, K. H. (1993). Locality and social representation: Space, discourse and alternative definitions of the rural. Journal of Rural Studies, 9, 23–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(93)90003-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harvey, D. L. (2002). Agency and community: A critical realist paradigm. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32, 163–194.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. (Original work published 1927).Google Scholar
  36. Höijor, B. (2011). Social representations theory: A new theory for media research. Nordic Review, 32, 3–16. Retrieved from http://www.nordicom.gu.se/sites/default/files/kapitel-pdf/345_hoijer.pdf Google Scholar
  37. Hosking, D. M. (2005). Bounded entities, constructivist revisions, and radical re-constructions. Cognitie, Creier, Comportament/Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 9, 609–622. Retrieved from https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/19337 Google Scholar
  38. Hosking, D. M. (2006). Discourses of relations and relational processes. In O. Kyriakidou & M. F. Özbilgin (Eds.), Relational perspectives in organizational studies: A research companion (pp. 265–277). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  39. Hosking, D. M. (2011). Telling tales of relations: Appreciating relational constructionism. Organization Studies, 32, 47–65.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610394296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hosking, D. M., & Bouwen, R. (2000). Organizational learning: Relational-constructionist approaches: An overview. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9, 129–132.  https://doi.org/10.1080/135943200397897 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hosking, D. M., & Morley, I. E. (2004). Social constructionism in community and applied social psychology. Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 318–331.  https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.801 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hosking, D. M., & Pluut, B. (2010). (Re)constructing reflexivity: A relational constructionist approach. The Qualitative Report, 15, 59–75. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1140&context=tqr Google Scholar
  43. Hosteller, J. A. (1964). The Amish use of symbols and their function in bounding the community. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 94, 11–22. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2844443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Howarth, C. S. (2001). Towards a social psychology of community: A social representations perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 31, 223–238.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Howarth, C. (2006). A social representation is not a quiet thing: Exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 65–86.  https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X43777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Howarth, C., Cornish, F., & Gillespie, A. (2015). Making community: Diversity, movement and interdependence. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 179–190). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. (Original work published 1954).Google Scholar
  48. Jessop, B., Brenner, N., & Jones, M. (2008). Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 389–401.  https://doi.org/10.1068/d9107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jovchelovitch, S. (1995). Social representations in and of the public sphere: Towards a theoretical articulation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 25, 81–102.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1995.tb00267.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jovchelovitch, S. (2002). Re-thinking the diversity of knowledge: Cognitive polyphasia, belief and representation [online]. London, UK: LSE Research Online. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/2628/1/Rethinkingthediversity.pdf
  51. Lahlou, S. (2015). Social representations and social construction: The evolutionary perspective of installation theory. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations (pp. 193–209). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing (Original work published 1974).Google Scholar
  54. Maciver, R. M. (1970). Community: A sociological study (4th ed.). London, UK: Frank Cass & Company Ltd.Google Scholar
  55. Marková, I. (2000). Amédéé or how to get rid of it: Social representations from a dialogical perspective. Culture & Psychology, 6, 419–460.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0064002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Massey, D. (1994). Space, place, and gender. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  58. McNamee, S. (2004a). Imagine Chicago: A methodology for cultivating community social construction in practice. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 406–409.  https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McNamee, S. (2004b). Relational bridges between constructionism and constructivism. In J. D. Raskin & S. K. Bridges (Eds.), Studies in meaning 2: Bridging the personal and social in constructivist psychology (pp. 37–50). New York, NY: Pace University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Mead, G. H. (1910). What social objects must psychology presuppose? The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 7, 174–180. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mead, G. H. (1912). The mechanism of social consciousness. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 9, 401–406. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2012643 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist (C. W. Morris, Ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  63. Miller, B. (1992). Collective action and rational choice: Place, community, and the limits to individual self-interest. Economic Geography, 68, 22–42. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/144039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Moscovici, S. (1963). Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 14, 231–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Moscovici, S. (1990). The generalized self and mass society. In H. T. Himmelweit & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Societal psychology (pp. 66–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  67. Moscovici, S. (2001). Why a theory of social representations? In K. Deaux & G. Philogène (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions (pp. 8–35). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  68. Moscovici, S., & Marková, I. (1998). Presenting social representations: A conversation. Culture & Psychology, 4, 371–410.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9800400305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nancy, J.-L. (1991). The inoperative community (P. Connor, Ed. and P. Connor, L. Garbus, M. Holland, & S. Sawhney, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  70. Nancy, J.-L. (2000). Being singular plural (R. D. Richardson & A. E. O’Byrne, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1996).Google Scholar
  71. Némedi, D. (1995). Collective consciousness, morphology, and collective representations: Durkheim’s sociology of knowledge. Sociological Perspectives, 38, 41–56.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1389261 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Pahl, R. (2005). Are all communities communities in the mind? The Sociological Review, 53, 621–640.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00587.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pearce, W. B. (1992). A “camper’s guide” to constructionisms. Human Systems: The Journal of Systemic Consultation & Management, 3, 139–161. Retrieved from http://www.humansystemsjournal.eu/library/volume-3-1992/3-3-4 Google Scholar
  74. Pratt, A. C. (1996). Discourses of rurality: Loose talk or social struggle? Journal of Rural Studies, 12, 69–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0743-0167(95)00046-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Raudsepp, M. (2005). Why is it so difficult to understand the theory of social representations? Culture & Psychology, 11, 455–468.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X05058587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schutz, A. (1971). Collected papers. Volume I. The problem of social reality (3rd ed.) (M. Natanson, Ed.). The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  77. Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shotter, J. (1998). The dialogical nature of our inner lives. Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action, 1, 185–200.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10001998098538699 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Soja, E. W. (1980). The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70, 207–225.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1980.tb01308.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Soja, E. W. (1985). The spatiality of social life: Towards a transformative retheorisation. In D. Gregory & J. Urry (Eds.), Social relations and spatial structures (pp. 90–127). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  82. Stephens, C. (2007). Community as practice: Social representations of community and their implications for health promotion. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17, 103–114.  https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.884 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tateo, L., & Iannaccone, A. (2012). Social representations, individual and collective mind: A study of Wundt, Cattaneo and Moscovici. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 46, 57–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9162-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  85. Tönnies, F. (1957). Community and society: Gemeinschaft und gesellschaft (C. P. Loomis, Ed. and Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers. (Original work published 1887).Google Scholar
  86. Voelklein, C., & Howarth, C. (2005). A review of controversies about social representations theory: A British debate. Culture & Psychology, 11, 431–454.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X05058586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wagner, W. (1996). Queries about social representation and construction. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26, 95–120.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1996.tb00524.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wagner, W., Duveen, G., Farr, R., Jovchelovitch, S., Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Marková, I., et al. (1999). Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 95–125.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Warren, R. L. (1978). The community in America (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  90. Wellman, B. (1999). Preface. In Networks in the global village: Life in contemporary communities (pp. xi–xxii). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  91. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  92. Wilkinson, K. P. (1991). The community in rural America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  93. Wundt, W. (1916). Elements of folk psychology: Outlines of psychological history of the development of mankind (E. L. Schaub, Trans.). New York, NY: The Macmillan Company. (Original work published 1912).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth C. Bessant
    • 1
  1. 1.Brandon UniversityBrandonCanada

Personalised recommendations