Abstract
Focusing on the two recent de facto moratorium periods, the author examines the public and governmental discourse on the death penalty during these eras. The chapter investigates the newly introduced saiban-in seido (quasi-jury system) and critically assesses the validity of ‘wide support’ of this system by the general public and lay assessors. Identifying the emerging issue of lay assessors’ feelings of guilt in lending a hand to state killing, the author reassesses the legitimacy of governmental use of the death penalty in Japan. The chapter investigates the extent to which the newly introduced saiban-in seido was strategically used to underscore the government’s position on capital punishment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Obara-Minnitt, M. (2016). Democracy Inaction: Governmental Justification for Capital Punishment During the De Facto Moratorium Periods (2009–2010 and 2010–2012). In: Japanese Moratorium on the Death Penalty. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55822-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55822-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-56530-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55822-0
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)